Read This Now: Two Reasons Why Facebook Wants to Fix Obnoxious Headlines
Through the perverse economics of Internet journalism, Facebook has become essential to the revenue of virtually every publication, including this one. So the social network's promise to cut down on spammy, deceptive posts has many sites atwitter.
Shutterstock
Through the perverse economics of Internet journalism, Facebook has become essential to the revenue of virtually every publication, including this one. So the social network’s promise to cut down on spammy, deceptive posts has many sites atwitter:
“Click-baiting” is when a publisher posts a link with a headline that encourages people to click to see more, without telling them much information about what they will see. Posts like these tend to get a lot of clicks, which means that these posts get shown to more people, and get shown higher up in News Feed.
However, when we asked people in an initial survey what type of content they preferred to see in their News Feeds, 80% of the time people preferred headlines that helped them decide if they wanted to read the full article before they had to click through.
The company says it will monitor users’ behavior in order to evaluate the value of the content they click away to. So if you leave and come right back, Facebook will deduce that you were duped by a shifty headline, and populate fewer news feeds with that particular story.
A lot of news organizations, such as Mother Jones, have managed to leverage the awesome power of Facebook and social sharing to get greater exposure for important stories. And then there are more opportunistic and perhaps manipulative outlets.
Facebook is probably right to try to weed out deceptive headlines that don’t inform readers so much as lure them. But the company has an ulterior motive.
The chances of a particular news story showing up in your feed are a lot higher if the media company or advertiser involved pays Facebook to “boost” the post. The fewer spammy, ad-oriented headlines that clutter up users’ news feeds, the better for Facebook’s actual spammy, ad-oriented content.
— Posted by Peter Z. Scheer
WAIT, BEFORE YOU GO…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
News
Trade group allies paid billions for ads and lobbying to keep fossil fuels flowing.
Its 30 newsrooms will continue to operate as it reorganizes in a tumultuous industry; the publicly traded company is expected to go private.
"They've decided to let political figures lie to you," the presidential hopeful says.
The company has made millions off former 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick's message. That money should go right back to the cause that message supports.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.