Overdue Review of Spy Program Lacks Muscle
The Justice Department will, at long last, examine the NSA's domestic spying program, through which agents have eavesdropped on countless phone calls and e-mails. Unfortunately, the review will not explore the legality of the program and was described by one Democrat as an attempt at appeasement.
The Justice Department will, at long last, examine the NSA’s domestic spying program, through which agents have eavesdropped on countless phone calls and e-mails. Unfortunately, the review will not explore the legality of the program and was described by one Democrat as an attempt at appeasement.
WAIT BEFORE YOU GO...International Herald Tribune:
The inquiry by Glenn A. Fine, the department’s inspector general, will focus on the role of Justice prosecutors and agents in carrying out the warrantless surveillance program run by the National Security Agency.
Fine’s investigation is not expected to address whether the controversial program is an unconstitutional expansion of presidential power, as its critics and a federal judge in Detroit have charged.
“After conducting initial inquiries into the program, we have decided to open a program review that will examine the department’s controls and use of information related to the program,” Fine wrote in a letter dated Monday to House and Senate leaders on judiciary, intelligence and appropriations committees.
The review also will look at “the department’s compliance with legal requirements governing the program,” according to the four-paragraph letter obtained by the Associated Press.
Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said the agency welcomes the review: “We expect that this review will assist Justice Department personnel in ensuring that the department’s activities comply with the legal requirements that govern the operation of the program.”
In January, Fine’s office said it did not have jurisdiction to investigate, as requested by more than three dozen Democrats, the legality of the secret program that monitors phone calls and e-mails between people in the U.S. and abroad when a link to terrorism is suspected.
Fine’s letter outlining his review was welcomed by congressional Democrats. At the same time, they said it falls short of examining issues at the heart of the debate — how the spying program evolved and whether its creation violated any laws.
“A full investigation into the program as a whole, not just the DOJ’s involvement, will be necessary,” said Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat.
This year, the ground feels uncertain — facts are buried and those in power are working to keep them hidden. Now more than ever, independent journalism must go beneath the surface.
At Truthdig, we don’t just report what's happening — we investigate how and why. We follow the threads others leave behind and uncover the forces shaping our future.
Your tax-deductible donation fuels journalism that asks harder questions and digs where others won’t.
Don’t settle for surface-level coverage.
Unearth what matters. Help dig deeper.
Donate now.
Courts & Law
Meanwhile, the Justice Department refuses to provide details to a federal judge about deportation flights.
Courts & Law
The 440 buildings and assets listed for potential sale represent more than $8.3 billion in “recapitalization needs,” according to Trump’s General Services Administration.
Courts & Law
Five house democrats sign letter citing "blatant disregard for judicial ethics."
Opinion
The Special Counsel should return to the grand jury and seek a superseding indictment adding a count for insurrection.
Editorial Cartoons
Courts & Law
The probe is designed to determine whether the police department is guilty of systemic constitutional violations.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.