On Art and Lying
It's been noted before, by the likes of Marlon Brando and others, that art might be a socially sanctioned form of lying -- or confabulating, as neuroscientists might call it. Could this be true?
It’s been noted before, by the likes of Marlon Brando and others, that art might be a socially sanctioned form of lying — or confabulating, as neuroscientists might call it. Could this be true? –KA
AS CHAOS UNFOLDS, FIND SOLID GROUND…Intelligent Life:
Perhaps this is why we felt it necessary to invent art in the first place: as a safe space into which our lies can be corralled, and channelled into something socially useful. Given the universal compulsion to tell stories, art is the best way to refine and enjoy the particularly outlandish or insightful ones. But that is not the whole story. The key way in which artistic “lies” differ from normal lies, and from the “honest lying” of chronic confabulators, is that they have a meaning and resonance beyond their creator. The liar lies on behalf of himself; the artist tell lies on behalf of everyone.
In this time of unprecedented challenges, independent journalism is more vital than ever. At Truthdig, we expose what power wants hidden and give you the clarity to make sense of it all.
Your donation helps ensure that truth telling continues.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.