Oil Prices Could Triple Upon a U.S. Invasion of Iran
That's according to Saudi Ambassador Prince Turki al Faisal. Not that that should be the reason that dissuades America from invading Iran, but it's at least worth noting.That’s according to Saudi Ambassador Prince Turki al Faisal. Not that that should be the reason that dissuades America from invading Iran, but it’s at least worth noting.
WAIT BEFORE YOU GO...U.S. News & World Report:
World oil prices could double or triple over the current painful $70-per-barrel level if diplomacy failed and military conflict broke out over Iran’s nuclear ambitions, Saudi Ambassador Prince Turki al-Faisal warned this morning.
“We don’t know” what will happen if the United States chooses a military option in Iran, al-Faisal said, but “if there is military conflict, if bombs are dropped, ships are blown up, oil facilities on our side of the gulf are targeted . . . just the idea of somebody firing a missile at an installation somewhere would shoot up the price of oil astronomically.” In such a scenario, he said, Saudi Arabia “hopefully would defend our oil installations as best as we can and seek an immediate resolution,” but the risks would be grave. “Not just our installations, but the whole gulf would become an inferno of exploding fuel tanks and shut-up facilities,” al-Faisal said.
This year, the ground feels uncertain — facts are buried and those in power are working to keep them hidden. Now more than ever, independent journalism must go beneath the surface.
At Truthdig, we don’t just report what's happening — we investigate how and why. We follow the threads others leave behind and uncover the forces shaping our future.
Your tax-deductible donation fuels journalism that asks harder questions and digs where others won’t.
Don’t settle for surface-level coverage.
Unearth what matters. Help dig deeper.
Donate now.
Wounds of War
In the throes of the Cold War, a tiny Caribbean island dared to wage a revolutionary experiment. As the Revo imploded, the United States invaded.
It’s not just that the Gray Lady is soft on Donald Trump. The paper and its editors view conservative whites as the only true Americans.
From the archives: In 2006, the social activist warned that an increasingly mainstream anti-war movement can be prone to loss of focus.
Arguing that no alternative exists to open-ended war represents not hard-nosed realism, but the abdication of statecraft. The real problem is war itself and the conviction that only through war can America remain America.
Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn speaks out about how U.S. foreign policy has helped create and foster the growth of global terrorism.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.