Obama Administration: Judges Can’t Stop Us From Classifying Whatever We Want
U.S. Justice Department attorneys argued -- at a hearing on a lawsuit seeking to make public the videotapes of a prisoner being force-fed at Guantanamo Bay prison -- that courts cannot order the unsealing of evidence that has been classified by the government.
U.S. Navy medical personnel flank a chair with restraints used for force-feeding and a tray holding nutritional shakes, a tube for feeding through the nose and lubricants, including a jar of olive oil, during a 2013 tour of the detainee hospital at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba. (AP / Charles Dharapak)
U.S. Justice Department attorneys argued at a hearing on a lawsuit seeking to make public the videotapes of a prisoner being force-fed at the Guantanamo Bay prison that courts cannot order the unsealing of evidence that has been classified by the government.
“We don’t think there is a First Amendment right to classified documents,” stated Justice Department lawyer Catherine Dorsey.
Sam Sacks reports at The Intercept:
The judges at the D.C. Court of Appeals appeared skeptical. Chief Judge Merrick Garland characterized the government’s position as tantamount to claiming the court “has absolutely no authority” to unseal evidence even if it’s clear the government’s bid to keep it secret is based on “irrationality” or that it’s “hiding something.”
“That is our position,” Dorsey agreed. She added that a more appropriate tool to compel the release of the videos was through a Freedom of Information Act request.
Sixteen media organizations, including First Look Media, are seeking footage of Abu Wa’el Dhiab being repeatedly force-fed at Guantánamo. Dhiab was held by the U.S. for 12 years without charges or trial before being released to Uruguay last December.
“There is a public right at stake,” David Schultz told the panel of judges on behalf of the media outlets, adding that the videos depict “illegal conduct by government employees.”
Continue reading here.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
As we navigate an uncertain 2025, with a new administration questioning press freedoms, the risks are clear: our ability to report freely is under threat.
Your tax-deductible donation enables us to dig deeper, delivering fearless investigative reporting and analysis that exposes the reality beneath the headlines — without compromise.
Now is the time to take action. Stand with our courageous journalists. Donate today to protect a free press, uphold democracy and uncover the stories that need to be told.
Prison Reform
Terrence Richardson and Ferrone Claiborne have spent decades behind bars after a jury acquitted them of murder. Now, the Virginia Supreme Court is set to decide their fate.
The decision conflicts with those by three other federal appeals courts.
A federal appeals court has revoked a key approval of the Mountain Valley Pipeline. Now, state regulators are working to change the rules—again—so the project can proceed.
“The great tragedy now is not only that Reinhardt has passed away, but that Donald Trump will get to name his successor,” says Truthdig columnist Bill Blum.
Merrick Garland, President Obama's centrist nominee, seems destined for summary rejection by the GOP-controlled Senate, even as legal observers worry that at any moment yet another death on the bench could intensify the partisan fight over the future of our nation's highest court.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.