Most of Syria’s Toxins May Be Easily Destroyed
After the announcement that the U.N. Security Council agreed to a resolution to rid Syria of its chemical weapons, The Washington Post reported that U.S. and Russian officials believe that the majority of the country's stockpile exists in an "unweaponized" form that can be destroyed quickly.
After the announcement that the U.N. Security Council agreed to a resolution to rid Syria of its chemical weapons, The Washington Post reported that U.S. and Russian officials believe that the majority of the country’s stockpile exists in an “unweaponized” form that can be destroyed quickly.
The Washington Post reports:
A confidential assessment by the two governments also concludes that Syria’s entire arsenal could be destroyed in about nine months, assuming that Syrian officials honor promises to surrender control of its chemical assets to international inspectors, according to two people briefed on the analysis.
The final version of the U.N. deal will be discussed by the full 15-member Security Council on Thursday night. The draft does not direct specific blame for the Aug. 21 attacks that killed hundreds of Syrians outside Damascus by asphyxiation. Russian officials led by President Vladimir Putin have repeatedly said they believe the Syrian rebels executed the attack.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Your support is crucial…With an uncertain future and a new administration casting doubt on press freedoms, the danger is clear: The truth is at risk.
Now is the time to give. Your tax-deductible support allows us to dig deeper, delivering fearless investigative reporting and analysis that exposes what’s really happening — without compromise.
Stand with our courageous journalists. Donate today to protect a free press, uphold democracy and unearth untold stories.
Photo Essay
Before the hippies were calling for “dropping acid, not bombs,” the United States government was hard at work developing hallucinogenic bombs.
The congresswoman has been labeled an "Assad apologist," but her skepticism about Syria's use of chemical weapons appears well warranted.
The confirmation hearing for the CIA director nominee offers a chance to show how the U.S. government manufactures consent through insidious means.
Truthdig writers Sonali Kolhatkar and Max Blumenthal disagree with each other regarding key elements in the recent reports that the Syrian government used chemical weapons in Douma. This is Blumenthal's take on the issue.
The U.S., the U.K. and France launched the attack even though they had no solid evidence that the Assad regime had used chemical warfare. The allies' action was little more than a propaganda exercise.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.