A lawyer for Aaron Swartz — the 26-year-old programmer and open-Internet activist who reportedly committed suicide Friday under pressure from threat of prosecution — says MIT refused to endorse a deal that would have granted Swartz probation or deferred prosecution.

JSTOR, the academic paper archive from which Swartz downloaded millions of articles in the act for which he was indicted, accepted the plea bargain, said attorney Marty Weinberg. MIT owned the computer closet from which Swartz downloaded the files.

An article published by The Boston Globe suggests the prosecution, led by Massachusetts’ U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz, would have accepted the deal had MIT signed off on it.

— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.

The Boston Globe:

Swartz and his lawyers were not looking for a free pass. They had offered to accept a deferred prosecution or probation, so that if Swartz pulled a stunt like that again, he would end up in prison.

Marty Weinberg, who took the case over from Good, said he nearly negotiated a plea bargain in which Swartz would not serve any time. He said JSTOR signed off on it, but MIT would not.

“There were subsets of the MIT community who were profoundly in support of Aaron,” Weinberg said. That support did not override institutional interests.

Read more

Your support matters…

Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.

You can help level the playing field. Become a member.

Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.

Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.

SUPPORT TRUTHDIG