Krugman Slams GOP Senator on Social Security: ‘Your Facts Are Wrong’
Memo to congressional Republicans: You might want to stray from GOP talking points and stick to the facts when facing off against a Nobel Prize-winning economist unless you want to be called out for falsehoods.
Memo to congressional Republicans: You might want to stray from GOP talking points and stick to the facts when facing off against a Nobel Prize-winning economist unless you want to be called out for falsehoods.
Tea party-backed Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson learned that the hard way Sunday during a heated panel discussion on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” in which he was accused by New York Times columnist Paul Krugman of getting the facts wrong on Social Security.
The debate began when Johnson said Social Security was in danger of “going broke” unless action was taken. “When I hear people saying Social Security is solvent to the year 2035, it’s not,” Johnson said.
Krugman replied, “You said ‘let’s start with the facts,’ but we’ve just run aground right there. Your facts are false. The Social Security thing — Social Security, it has a dedicated revenue base, it has a trust fund based on that dedicated revenue base. You can’t change the rules midstream and say, ‘Oh well, suddenly the trust fund doesn’t count.’ ”
Johnson countered that “the trust fund is a fiction. It doesn’t … it has no value in the federal government.”
Krugman responded, “It is important to realize that the facts that are being brought out here are, in fact, non-facts.”
The New York Times columnist later took to his Conscience of a Liberal blog after the contentious exchange to again excoriate the Wisconsin senator and other conservatives in the GOP. “I’ve explained this one over and over again, for example here,” he wrote. “And I have to say, it’s extremely telling that conservative Republicans don’t seem able to make their case without resorting, right from the beginning, to obviously dumb fallacies.”
Think Progress also noted, “The Social Security trust fund is solvent through 2038, and the program would almost certainly have long-term solvency were it not for the Republican-backed cap on payroll taxes for income above a certain level.”
— Posted by Tracy Bloom.
WAIT BEFORE YOU GO...This year, the ground feels uncertain — facts are buried and those in power are working to keep them hidden. Now more than ever, independent journalism must go beneath the surface.
At Truthdig, we don’t just report what's happening — we investigate how and why. We follow the threads others leave behind and uncover the forces shaping our future.
Your tax-deductible donation fuels journalism that asks harder questions and digs where others won’t.
Don’t settle for surface-level coverage.
Unearth what matters. Help dig deeper.
Donate now.
Politics
We should actively pursue policies in the national interest, not intentionally inflame tensions at the expense of international cooperation.
Impeachment is an important historical moment — but we must look past it to create the possibility of real change.
A spate of recent op-eds have compared the Vermont senator to our authoritarian president. Their agenda couldn't be any more transparent.
The New York Times columnist insists that Donald Trump is an aberration. It’s an argument that ignores centuries of American history.
A new survey finds U.S. opinion journalists are in lockstep with the Trump administration when it comes to the Maduro government.
Universal health care has long been Democrats' holy grail. But even if legislation fails, there's still a way to fix our broken system.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.