Justice Torture Memos Say ‘Good Faith’ Is Legal Defense
Ah, good intentions, with which that famous path was paved: According to Justice Department documents obtained and released by the ACLU on Thursday -- albeit heavily redacted -- CIA interrogators were authorized to use waterboarding and other "enhanced interrogation techniques" that they believed "in good faith" would not "have the specific intent to inflict severe pain or suffering."
Ah, good intentions, with which that famous path was paved: According to Justice Department documents obtained and released by the ACLU on Thursday — albeit heavily redacted — CIA interrogators were authorized to use waterboarding and other “enhanced interrogation techniques” that they believed “in good faith” would not “have the specific intent to inflict severe pain or suffering.”
Your support matters…CNN:
The interrogator’s “good faith” and “honest belief” that the interrogation will not cause such suffering protects the interrogator, the memo adds.
“Because specific intent is an element of the offense, the absence of specific intent negates the charge of torture,” Jay Bybee, then the assistant attorney general, wrote in the memo.
The 18-page memo is heavily redacted, with 10 of its 18 pages completely blacked out and only a few paragraphs legible on the others.
Another memo released Thursday advises that “the waterboard,” or simulated drowning, does “not violate the Torture Statute.”
It also cites a number of warnings against torture, including statements by President Bush and a then-new Supreme Court ruling “which raises possible concerns about future U.S. judicial review of the [interrogation] Program.”
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Courts & Law
"Trump's legal theory defies common sense and would enable an almost limitless tyranny," warned Public Citizen's president.
Courts & Law
"This decision is a devastating blow to the civil rights of every American, and the integrity of our nation's electoral system."
Ear to the Ground
A new bill would inscribe a “right to housing” in the Golden State’s constitution.
The decision conflicts with those by three other federal appeals courts.
The lawsuit centers on two trans sprinters who have frequently outperformed their cisgender competitors.
A ProPublica investigation reveals how Border Patrol's nearly unchecked powers over the fate of migrants is tearing families apart.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.