Judge Defangs Arizona Immigration Law
U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton decided Wednesday that SB 1070's most controversial bits, such as requiring immigrants to carry papers wherever they go, will have to wait until the courts can sort out the mess. As written, the law, which was set to take effect Thursday, would restrict the liberty of "lawfully-present aliens," the judge said.
U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton decided Wednesday that SB 1070’s most controversial bits, such as requiring immigrants to carry papers wherever they go, will have to wait until the courts can sort out the mess. As written, the law, which was set to take effect Thursday, would restrict the liberty of “lawfully-present aliens,” the judge said.
The judge agreed with the view that federal immigration law trumps SB 1070.
Your support matters…AP via Google:
But for now, opponents of the law have prevailed: The provisions that most angered opponents will not take effect, including sections that required officers to check a person’s immigration status while enforcing other laws.
The judge also delayed parts of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places — a move aimed at day laborers. In addition, the judge blocked officers from making warrantless arrests of suspected illegal immigrants.
“Requiring Arizona law enforcement officials and agencies to determine the immigration status of every person who is arrested burdens lawfully-present aliens because their liberty will be restricted while their status is checked,” Bolton, a Clinton appointee, said in her decision.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Editorial Cartoons
Women
The ruling by the Arizona Supreme Court claims the Civil War-era law, which prevents the termination of a pregnancy even in cases of rape or incest, must stand.
Will it be the corporate establishment or working people? How the Massachusetts senator chooses could determine the Democratic nomination.
A new investigation finds the former Trump adviser used a private jet owned by a wealthy Chinese businessman during the midterm elections.
This marks the first time waivers have applied to federal procurement rules. Previously ones waived environmental impact reviews.
Donald Trump's pet project is a humanitarian and environmental disaster in more ways than one.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.