Income Growth for 90 Percent of Americans Over Last 4 Decades Averaged $59
For the top 10 percent of American taxpayers though, it was--not surprisingly--a lot more.
If this viral video on wealth inequality in the U.S. wasn’t enough to convince you that something is very wrong with our economic system, then perhaps a new analysis of data that shows the disparity between income gains of the top 10 percent of taxpayers versus those of everyone else will.
According to Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Cay Johnston, who got his figures from an analysis of the latest IRS data by economists Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Piketty, income grew a jaw-dropping $59 on average for the bottom 90 percent of Americans between 1966 and 2011 (adjusting the income for inflation, of course). Income for the top 10 percent, on the other hand, rose from an average of $116,071 to $254,864.
To put that in perspective, Johnston says that if you were to plot the numbers on a chart, with $59 representing 1 inch, the line for the top 10 percent would go up more than 163 feet. If you compared the vast majority’s income growth with that of the top 1 percent, the line on the chart would extend 884 feet. And if you measured it against the top 1 percent of the top 1 percent, well … that would require a really, really big chart, as the line would be nearly 5 miles long.
David Cay Johnston at Tax Analysts:
Those at the top are pulling away from everyone else not because of hard work, but the shift of income from labor to capital and changes in federal income, gift, and estate tax rules.
The median wage has been stuck since 1999 at a bit more than $500 per week in real terms and job growth has lagged far beyond population growth. But capital gains and dividends have soared, a new Congressional Research Service study shows. And, of course, the rich get most of that income.
…The Saez-Piketty analysis shows the concentration of growth at the very top increasing. That is bad for tax revenue and bad for social stability. The drop in incomes among the vast majority holds back economic growth, because there is just not enough aggregate demand to support creating enough new jobs to keep up with population growth.
And who was hit hardest by the new federal taxes that took effect this year? The vast majority.
— Posted by Tracy Bloom.
WAIT, BEFORE YOU GO…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Confirmed cases rise to 63,851 in mainland China, an increase of 5,090 from a day earlier, according to the National Health Commission.
If you’ve got more money than you can spend, you can spend your extra wealth on guarding your extra wealth.
A new study proves all our worst tax fears.
The gap between the haves and have-nots in the U.S. is at its highest level in more than 50 years of tracking income inequality.
According to a new Forbes report, only fellow Democratic candidates Julián Castro, Tim Ryan and Bill de Blasio can make the same claim.
An honest analysis of the tax system calls out in stark detail the extreme injustice of the U.S. economy and highlights the need to transform it.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.