Holder Defends 9/11 Trial Plan
Attorney General Eric Holder's idea to hold a criminal trial in New York City for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others implicated in the 9/11 terrorist attack plot has been sharply criticized, primarily from the right side of the aisle, but Holder defended his decision before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.
Attorney General Eric Holder’s idea to hold a criminal trial in New York City for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others implicated in the 9/11 terrorist attack plot has been sharply criticized, primarily from the right side of the aisle, but Holder defended his decision before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. –KA
Your support matters…The Los Angeles Times:
In testimony today before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder said, “We need not cower in the face of this enemy. Our institutions are strong, our infrastructure is sturdy, our resolve is firm, and our people are ready.”
During the lengthy hearing, lawmakers sparred with the attorney general — and each other — over the administration’s decision last week to send Mohammed and four alleged co-conspirators from the Guantanamo Bay military detention center to a courthouse just blocks from Ground Zero.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
It falls short of first recommendation after extraordinary Justice Department actions in case involving lying to Congress in Russia probe.
Trailblazing California attorney general and senator failed to attract attention and cash with what was seen as an inconsistent message.
Attorneys general from several states are taking legal measures to stop the merger.
Congressional leaders could go directly to court to try to force compliance with subpoenas under a resolution approved earlier this week.
He says charging the president with a crime was not an option in his first public comments on the two-year Russian interference inquiry.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.