Health Website’s Cosmetic Makeover
WebMD, the popular medical and health advice site, was “nailed for servicing Big Pharma” after a 2010 online questionnaire was shown to diagnose depression and suggest “a river of pills” no matter how the quiz was answered. The site has since tried to give itself an "ethical makeover," but the industry ties remain.
WebMD, the popular medical and health advice site, was “nailed for servicing Big Pharma” after a 2010 online questionnaire was shown to diagnose depression and suggest “a river of pills” no matter how the quiz was answered. The site has since tried to give itself an “ethical makeover,” but the industry ties remain.
The website generates revenue “primarily through the sale of advertising and sponsorship programs to pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device companies, and [health, diet and fitness-related] consumer products, [as well as] licensing content to insurance companies and health plans,” CEO Wayne Gattinella admitted during an investigation of the questionnaire.
Ninety-five percent of American adults looking to diagnose themselves consult WebMD each year, and 72 percent of physicians recommend the site to their patients, says health reporter Terry Allen.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Dig, Root, GrowTerry Allen at In These Times:
It’s unlikely that WebMD’s new CEO, Cavan Redmond, appointed on May 31, will end the insalubrious industry hookups. Redmond, who has also worked at Wyeth and Sandoz, moved to WebMD from a senior executive position at Pfizer’s marketing arm. That gig, the trade website Medical Marketing and Media noted, will give him “a keen understanding of what [WebMD’s] advertisers want.”
What consumers want is sound, independent information. But they, along with experts and doctors, are bombarded with manipulative advertising and industry-funded drug and device studies that can incorporate shady or even illegal tactics to obscure bad science and conflicts of interest.
Industry-funded, ad-reliant medical websites such as WebMD reflect the same market pressures and biases. Some WebMD ads are annoying but obvious. Others, barely set off by the word “advertisement” in minuscule pale gray type, blend into edited news and features. More insidious is content wholly generated by advertisers, which, despite being labeled “sponsored,” is often set in the same font, colors and style as WebMD’s “independent” information.
This year, we’re all on shaky ground, and the need for independent journalism has never been greater. A new administration is openly attacking free press — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.
Your support is more than a donation. It helps us dig deeper into hidden truths, root out corruption and misinformation, and grow an informed, resilient community.
Independent journalism like Truthdig doesn't just report the news — it helps cultivate a better future.
Your tax-deductible gift powers fearless reporting and uncompromising analysis. Together, we can protect democracy and expose the stories that must be told.
This spring, stand with our journalists.
Dig. Root. Grow. Cultivate a better future.
Donate today.
Courts & Law
A little-noticed 9-0 decision points ominously toward a post-parody culture.
TD Original
Meet the scholars-for-hire who preach solidarity in service of a software company with a long and sordid record of collaboration.
Politics
ESG is called “woke capitalism” by the right and “greenwashing” by the left. But to most investors, it’s just common sense.
Economic Justice
The move would disrupt the influence of UNOS, the contractor whose control of organ sharing has been nearly all-encompassing for decades.
Technology
A flood of new satellites could lead to the destruction of the ozone layer.
Economic Justice
Twenty of the world’s biggest food corporations paid $53.5 billion to their shareholders over the past two years.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.