Government Moves to Block ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Injunction
As expected, the Justice Department asked an appeals court Wednesday to put a hold on U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips' recent injunction to stop the military from enforcing its "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Why would the government do this?
As expected, the Justice Department asked an appeals court Wednesday to put a hold on U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips’ recent injunction to stop the military from enforcing its “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. Why would the government do this? According to the DoJ, the ruling was too quick and all-encompassing, and it bypassed crucial judicial steps that shouldn’t be skipped. This one could go all the way to the Supreme Court. –KA
Wait, before you go…Los Angeles Times:
The Justice Department said it has a duty to defend the laws enacted by Congress, even though President Obama is urging Congress to repeal the law and to allow openly gay men and women to serve in the military.
The government said the “sweeping injunction against a duly enacted Act of Congress” was wrong as a matter of law. It is “at odds with basic principles of judicial restraint requiring courts to limit injunctive relief to the parties before the court, and is contrary to decisions of other courts, which have sustained the constitutionality of the statute.”
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
Courts & Law
Will Merrick Garland and Jack Smith succeed where Bill Barr and Robert Mueller failed?
A revealing new study finds the Justice Department charged just 359 such criminals in January—a decline of 25% from five years ago.
Since his acquittal, the president has only doubled down on his impeachable offenses, subverting both the republic and its Constitution.
The Trump administration seeks a ruling it could potentially use to deport millions of people, even those arrested far from the border.
The decision conflicts with those by three other federal appeals courts.
The president's hand-picked attorney general has put the Justice Department at the disposal of the White House, shredding the rule of law.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.