Google Fights for Transparency in FISA Court
The Internet giant's petition to the tribunal says its free speech rights have been violated because it is legally prohibited from discussing even the vaguest details of government surveillance requests.
The Internet giant says its free speech rights have been violated because it is legally prohibited from discussing even the vaguest details of government surveillance requests. In an effort to ease the rules on what information it can disclose about such requests, the company has petitioned the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
According to a report on Time.com, “Google points out that it can’t even confirm or deny that is has received FISA court orders.”
Google was identified as a cooperator along with other technology leaders in numerous reports about the government’s massive surveillance program called PRISM. Most if not all of the companies named have vehemently denied that they allow the government direct access to their servers.
Other companies that were named — Facebook, Yahoo, Apple and Microsoft — worked out a deal with the government to disclose information requests, but Google backed out of negotiations because it would have had to group the FISA requests with other lawful inquiries. “Lumping national security requests together with criminal requests — as some companies have been permitted to do — would be a backward step for our users,” read a Google statement on the matter.
When the PRISM story first broke, Google CEO Larry Page and Chief Legal Officer David Drummond penned a blog post called, “What the … ?” “First,” they wrote, “we have not joined any program that would give the U.S. government—or any other government—direct access to our servers. Indeed, the U.S. government does not have direct access or a ‘back door’ to the information stored in our data centers. We had not heard of a program called PRISM until yesterday.”
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a champion of Internet privacy, praised Google’s decision to fight for more transparency. The advocacy group currently gives the tech company four out of five stars in its “Who Has Your Back?” report on how Internet companies handle privacy and transparency with regard to government access to users’ information. Yahoo, by comparison, has only one star.
— Posted by Peter Z. Scheer.
Your support is crucial...As we navigate an uncertain 2025, with a new administration questioning press freedoms, the risks are clear: our ability to report freely is under threat.
Your tax-deductible donation enables us to dig deeper, delivering fearless investigative reporting and analysis that exposes the reality beneath the headlines — without compromise.
Now is the time to take action. Stand with our courageous journalists. Donate today to protect a free press, uphold democracy and uncover the stories that need to be told.
Robert Scheer talks with Nate Cardozo, the attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, on the struggle to protect free expression, privacy and innovation in a hyperconnected world.
The website-hosting company DreamHost is challenging the Justice Department's search warrant in court.
The Detroit News reports that FBI and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents used invasive surveillance equipment in their hunt for undocumented immigrants.
Last week, the Senate voted 50-48 to pass a measure that would repeal federal privacy requirements The House is scheduled to vote Tuesday Last week, the Senate voted 50-48 to pass a measure that would repeal federal privacy requirements.
Further erosions of privacy are likely as companies develop more and better methods for gathering information on internet users.
The intelligence agency is facing blowback from advocacy organizations in response to its proposal for long-term storage and use of personal information—including that of people who haven’t committed crimes.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.