Gates Defends U.S. Soldiers’ Actions in Infamous Video
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has defended the U.S. soldiers who were made infamous in a video released by the website Wikileaks last week, saying the critiques of those who fired upon and killed a group of reporters and civilians lack context.
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has defended the U.S. soldiers who were made infamous in a video released by the website Wikileaks last week, saying the critiques of those who fired upon and killed a group of reporters and civilians lack context.
The video, available below, shows American soldiers mistaking reporters for insurgents and firing at them from a helicopter. One journalist with a camera on his shoulder is believed to have an RPG, while a family that arrives in a van to help the wounded is impatiently fired upon after being thought to be a group of insurgent sympathizers. –JCL
TRUTHDIG’S JOURNALISM REMAINS CLEARFox News:
Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Sunday defended the soldiers shown firing on a group of people near Baghdad in a classified military video released last week, saying the troops were caught in a “split-second” situation and the video doesn’t show the “broader picture.”
Gates acknowledged that the grainy, black-and-white video showing men on the streets running from gunfire while U.S. troops appear to make playful remarks, is a “hard thing to see,” but said he doesn’t anticipate the footage will hurt the U.S. image abroad.
“It’s unfortunate. It’s clearly not helpful, but by the same token I think it should not have any lasting consequences,” Gates told ABC’s “This Week.”
The storytellers of chaos tried to manipulate the political and media narrative in 2025, but independent journalism exposed what they tried to hide. When you read Truthdig, you see through the illusion.
Support Independent Journalism.
Journalists and rivals called Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz on his inane and ruthless suggestion that the United States begin carpet-bombing Islamic State forces in Syria. But his poll numbers still crept up.
In the twenty-first-century world of drone warfare, one question with two aspects reigns supreme: Who counts? In Washington, the answers are the same.
I have no doubt that Obama's regret over the unintended deaths of two men in a drone strike on a suspected al-Qaida compound is sincere. But history tells us that good-faith effort is not enough to guarantee that sound moral choices are made.
David Rothkopf at Foreign Policy magazine points to the civilian deaths on a beach in Gaza and airspace over Ukraine to argue that using "the chaos of combat" to achieve complex political ends is futile.
The whistle-blower website just dropped 91,000 secret documents, which were simultaneously published by The New York Times, The Guardian and Der Spiegel There are many revelations and more to come, but we already know that NATO forces appear to be responsible for hundreds of unclaimed civilian deaths and injuries continued.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.