Friendly Fire May Have Killed Two GI’s
The Army is admitting the possibility that two U.S. soldiers were killed by friendly fire in the Iraqi city of Ramadi on Feb. 2. An investigation is still underway, but an Army official says it's possible that the "confusion that you frequently find on the battlefield" may have caused the soldiers to be shot by their own side.The Army is admitting the possibility that two U.S. soldiers, Pvt. Matthew Zeimer and Spc. Alan E. McPeek, were killed by friendly fire in the volatile Iraqi city of Ramadi on Feb. 2. An investigation is still underway, but an Army official says it’s possible that the “confusion that you frequently find on the battlefield” may have caused the soldiers to be shot by their own side.
Your support is crucial…Seattle Times:
According to published reports at the time of the incident, McPeek, Zeimer and other soldiers came under attack by insurgents at their outpost in central Ramadi.
A report in the Army Times newspaper said the two soldiers ran to a roof to fight back, but a shot was fired through a concrete wall near them and the impact killed them.
With an uncertain future and a new administration casting doubt on press freedoms, the danger is clear: The truth is at risk.
Now is the time to give. Your tax-deductible support allows us to dig deeper, delivering fearless investigative reporting and analysis that exposes what’s really happening — without compromise.
During this holiday season, stand with our courageous journalists. Donate today to protect a free press, uphold democracy and ensure the stories that matter are told.
For this retired U.S. Army officer, the president's Thanksgiving visit with the troops has been "triggering" in all the worst ways.
The ACLU blasts the clemency action for Mathew Golsteyn and Clint Lorance as an "utterly shameful use of presidential powers."
Defense leaders express dismay and a resolve to do more to increase resilience in the force.
The CNN pundit appears to be taking his talking points from prominent military sources.
There already exists a proven protocol for the proper use of firearms. Why can’t it be implemented for civilians?
Aggressive, highly trained and hypermasculine Navy SEALs should not be used as the go-to tool for waging global imperial war.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.