U.S. District Judge William Pauley ruled Friday that the National Security Agency’s dragnet collection of telephone data is legal, dismissing a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union.

The Guardian reports:

US district judge William Pauley said the dragnet program “represents the government’s counter-punch” to al-Qaida in the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks. The decision conflicts with a ruling in another case, increasing the likelihood that the US supreme court will take up the issue.

In the latest case, Pauley noted that the program was controversial, but lawful. “While robust discussions are under way across the nation, in Congress, and at the White House, the question for this court is whether the government’s bulk telephony metadata program is lawful. The court finds it is.

“But the question of whether that program should be conducted is for the other two coordinate branches of government to decide.”

Pauley’s ruling stated the phone data-collection program could have helped investigators detect plans for the 9/11 attacks. That claim seems to ignore the fact that traditional intelligence work and notices from U.S. allies had turned up abundant evidence that an attack was imminent.

— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.

 TRUTHDIG’S JOURNALISM REMAINS CLEAR

The storytellers of chaos tried to manipulate the political and media narrative in 2025, but independent journalism exposed what they tried to hide.

When you read Truthdig, you see through the illusion.

Support Independent Journalism.

SUPPORT TRUTHDIG
In this Article:
#metadata#national security agency#nsa