FCC to Investigate BART for Cutting Cell Service
The Federal Communications Commission said Monday that it will investigate San Francisco's Bay Area Rapid Transit because of its decision to interrupt cellphone service on Aug. 11 before a protest planned for that day. The interruption lasted three hours.
The Federal Communications Commission said Monday that it will investigate San Francisco’s Bay Area Rapid Transit because of its decision to interrupt cellphone service on Aug. 11 before a protest planned for that day. The interruption lasted three hours.
BART officials stand by their decision, saying it was taken to “ensure the safety of everyone on the platform” in anticipation of an organized protest on BART trains and platforms against the shootings of two men by BART police.
That justification does not satisfy free-speech and civil rights groups, which remain angry. So angry, in fact, that on Monday night supporters of the hacking group Anonymous and earlier protesters against alleged BART police brutality came out in droves, forcing police to shut down several underground BART stations. –BF
Your support matters…PCMag.com:
BART insisted that cell phone service was not disrupted outside its stations, and pointed out that intercoms and courtesy phones were still operational in areas where service was blocked.
“Paid areas of BART stations are reserved for ticketed passengers who are boarding, exiting or waiting for BART cars and trains, or for authorized BART personnel,” BART said. “No person shall conduct or participate in assemblies or demonstrations or engage in other expressive activities in the paid areas of BART stations, including BART cars and trains and BART station platforms.”
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), however, said “BART is the first known government agency in the United States to block cell service in order to disrupt a political protest.”
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
"Both well-meaning and more illicit-minded intelligence professionals basically realize [exposures of the inner workings of power] can't go on," the publisher and journalist tells the "On Contact" host in a discussion about attacks on such organizations as WikiLeaks.
Further enraging state residents, Michele Reagan acknowledged that many voters were given provisional ballots because their party affiliation had been changed without their knowledge.
A look back at some of our favorites from the reading stack.
Washington long has had an unholy alliance with one of the world's worst abusers. We must cut those ties.
As the surveillance state has harnessed the very technologies that were supposed to liberate us, a new book explores the shadowy world of Anonymous, an online "community" that has targeted corporations and governments guilty of perceived offenses against digital liberty.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.