Ex-Starbucks CEO Schultz Rules Out Independent 2020 Bid
Howard Schultz said there wasn't enough support for an independent candidate to run in the next presidential election.
Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz. (Richard Drew / AP)
WASHINGTON—Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz says he’s no longer considering an independent presidential bid.
Schultz said Friday in a letter posted on his website, “I have concluded that an independent campaign for the White House is not how I can best serve our country at this time.”
Schultz faced intense resistance from Democratic activists who feared an independent run would give President Donald Trump an easier path to reelection. Schultz says not enough people are willing to back an independent because they fear doing so “might lead to reelecting a uniquely dangerous incumbent president.”
Schultz announced in June he was taking a “detour” from a possible independent 2020 bid, citing health concerns. The billionaire businessman said at the time he’d revisit his presidential ambitions after Labor Day.
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
Credit where credit is due: The DNC’s latest “moderate” prospect for 2020 comes complete with a slate of blatantly nonprogressive stances.
Wednesday's prime-time event will be a stark departure from Bloomberg’s highly choreographed campaign.
The budget proposal offers a terrifying preview of what we can expect from Trump if he wins another four years in office.
As progressives gain momentum, media outlets are failing their readers with articles that uncritically amplify powerful interests.
The former U.S. Labor Secretary explains his case for why Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren have the best chance of defeating Trump.
He trades on his hometown’s “progressive” credentials but made NYC’s inequality issues worse—as he’d do on a national scale.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.