European Human Rights Group, U.S. Media Decry SCOTUS Ruling
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Thursday to loosen corporate restrictions on campaign finance didn't sit well with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, an international human rights coalition of 56 European nations, but somehow we doubt that the top court's conservative justices are going to lose sleep over that particular critique.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday to loosen corporate restrictions on campaign finance didn’t sit well with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, an international human rights coalition of 56 European nations, but somehow we doubt that the top court’s conservative justices are going to lose sleep over that particular critique. Oh, and certain members of the American media didn’t like SCOTUS’ ruling either.
Wait, before you go…The Washington Post:
The head of its office that monitors democratic practices says the ruling effectively lifting limits on election spending by corporations and unions “threatens to further marginalize candidates without strong financial backing or extensive personal resources.”
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
If the former mayor of New York City secures the Democratic nomination, it will be a major blow to American democracy.
A New York candidate successfully petitioned to allow campaign money to cover the costs, but only for those running for federal office.
Among them are a hedge fund manager, a charter school founder and a lawyer who represented Wall Street banks.
The former VP's campaign is so cash-poor that it has moved from disavowing an outside super PAC to throwing the door open to one.
The online retail giant has poured $1 million into getting more business-friendly candidates elected.
Major donors to both parties are trying desperately to get more fossil fuels to market.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.