European Human Rights Group, U.S. Media Decry SCOTUS Ruling
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Thursday to loosen corporate restrictions on campaign finance didn't sit well with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, an international human rights coalition of 56 European nations, but somehow we doubt that the top court's conservative justices are going to lose sleep over that particular critique.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday to loosen corporate restrictions on campaign finance didn’t sit well with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, an international human rights coalition of 56 European nations, but somehow we doubt that the top court’s conservative justices are going to lose sleep over that particular critique. Oh, and certain members of the American media didn’t like SCOTUS’ ruling either.
Your support matters…The Washington Post:
The head of its office that monitors democratic practices says the ruling effectively lifting limits on election spending by corporations and unions “threatens to further marginalize candidates without strong financial backing or extensive personal resources.”
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Media
The Texas senator’s iHeartMedia deal, which sent over $600,000 to an aligned super PAC, may be illegal—or it exploits a new loophole.
If the former mayor of New York City secures the Democratic nomination, it will be a major blow to American democracy.
A New York candidate successfully petitioned to allow campaign money to cover the costs, but only for those running for federal office.
Among them are a hedge fund manager, a charter school founder and a lawyer who represented Wall Street banks.
The former VP's campaign is so cash-poor that it has moved from disavowing an outside super PAC to throwing the door open to one.
The online retail giant has poured $1 million into getting more business-friendly candidates elected.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.