EU Rejects Aggressive Cut in Carbon Emissions
On Tuesday, conservative British representatives led the European Parliament to reject a 30 percent reduction in carbon emissions by 2020 in a preliminary vote stirred by claims that such a sharp decrease taken out of step with other nations would drive businesses out of EU countries. (more)
On Tuesday, conservative British representatives led the European Parliament to reject a 30 percent reduction in carbon emissions by 2020 in a preliminary vote stirred by claims that such a sharp decrease taken out of step with other nations would drive businesses out of EU countries.
The vote was not decisive. Representatives favoring aggressive carbon reductions based on climate science are expected to push for tougher targets in the future, but first will have to find a way to subvert or appease the powerful business interests rallied around Martin Callanan — the British Tory parliamentarian who led the vote — and his peers. –ARK
WAIT, BEFORE YOU GO…The Guardian:
A rebellion by the UK’s Tory MEPs helped to swing the vote against a tougher target on how much carbon emissions should be cut by 2020, but was not decisive, according to insiders.
The vote does not put an end to green campaigners’ hopes of a more ambitious emissions reduction target — a higher cut of 30% by 2020 on 1990 levels rather than 20% — as the issue will continue to be debated, but is a setback.
The political wrangling involved a series of amendments, proposed by Conservative groupings of MEPs, that would have weakened the resulting resolution to an extent that was not acceptable to the Green MEP grouping.
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Health & Wellness
More and more people are choosing a diet that is focused on reducing one's environmental footprint.
Dig
Absent from most public and policy conversations is any acknowledgement of the possibility that renewable energy cannot power a high-consumption civilization. This series will explore mounting evidence that a major downshift in consumption is looming — and explore the implications of this energy realism for human progress and flourishing.
Environment
Among the most notable countries with lacking ambition are China and the United States.
We can’t let another crisis go to waste.
The Amazon founder says he plans to give grants this summer to scientists, activists and nonprofits working to protect earth.
Emissions will climb further, the economy is in peril, and it's only January.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.