Cruz Repeats Background Check Fib During GOP Debate
During CNN's Republican debate Tuesday evening, the Texas senator reiterated his false claim that legislation backed by Sen. Marco Rubio would have dramatically expanded President Obama’s authority to bring Syrian refugees into the U.S. without background checks.
Ted Cruz during Tuesday’s debate. (John Locher / AP)
Sen. Ted Cruz reiterated his false claim that legislation backed by Sen. Marco Rubio would have dramatically expanded President Obama’s authority to bring Syrian refugees into the U.S. without background checks.
FactCheck.org looked into this claim Friday. It ruled:
The bill, S. 744, would have made it easier for members of certain groups designated by the president to qualify as refugees, but they would still be subject to the required screening process of refugees before they could come to the U.S.
We first heard Cruz make this claim during an interview with Megyn Kelly of Fox News on Nov. 24. Cruz was defending himself against claims made in a TV ad from a super PAC supporting Rubio, a fellow candidate for the GOP nomination for president.
Cruz said that Rubio’s supporters were attacking him because they were worried about Rubio having supported the Senate immigration bill that would have paved the way for Syrian Muslims to come to the U.S.
Read more here.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Your support is crucial...As we navigate an uncertain 2025, with a new administration questioning press freedoms, the risks are clear: our ability to report freely is under threat.
Your tax-deductible donation enables us to dig deeper, delivering fearless investigative reporting and analysis that exposes the reality beneath the headlines — without compromise.
Now is the time to take action. Stand with our courageous journalists. Donate today to protect a free press, uphold democracy and uncover the stories that need to be told.
Editorial Cartoons
Editorial Cartoons
Its new “transparency features” that aim to give users more control over how many political ads they see are unlikely to appease critics.
The conservative site has published work by white supremacists.
What do you achieve when you let the conservative magazine operate as a fact-checker for one of the internet's most powerful platforms?
The way in which our mainstream media fact-checks Donald Trump is meant to deceive us.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.