Critics Question U.S. Role in Libya as Air Attacks Continue
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin wasn't thrilled with the UN Security Council's go-ahead to let US and European forces fire on Moammar Gadhafi's troops in Libya, and he said so Monday He wasn't alone in his criticism of what began as .Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin wasn’t thrilled with the U.N. Security Council’s go-ahead to let U.S. and European forces fire on Moammar Gadhafi’s troops in Libya, and he said so Monday. He wasn’t alone in his criticism of what began as a plan to enforce a no-fly zone but by the end of the weekend was looking more like a substantial air war, complete with Tomahawk missiles and B-2 bombers.
Gadhafi, true to form, remained defiant and pointed westward to accuse coalition forces of killing Libyan civilians, and on the domestic front Obama’s critics wondered where the campaign that started with the grandiosely named Operation Odyssey Dawn would end, and what exactly was the point. –KA
Your support is crucial…The Washington Post:
Air Force B-2 stealth bombers as well as Marine Harrier jets flying from a ship in the Mediterranean followed up on the dozens of Tomahawk cruise-missile strikes that opened the assault on Libya, called Operation Odyssey Dawn. U.S. fighter jets mounted attacks on Libyan soldiers advancing on the rebel-held city of Benghazi as part of a broader mission to protect the besieged opposition forces from being overrun, said a senior U.S. military official.
The strikes, which were carried out by 15 U.S. fighter jets as well as French and British planes, left a smoking graveyard of military vehicles outside Benghazi.
[…] The United States also mounted strikes with satellite-guided bombs on an airfield outside the coastal city of Misurata, where the Libyan air force maintained fighter jets in hardened shelters. Gaddafi continued to keep the Soviet-era fighters on the ground, and the United States detected no radar emissions from any of the air defense sites that it had targeted, military officials said.
With an uncertain future and a new administration casting doubt on press freedoms, the danger is clear: The truth is at risk.
Now is the time to give. Your tax-deductible support allows us to dig deeper, delivering fearless investigative reporting and analysis that exposes what’s really happening — without compromise.
Stand with our courageous journalists. Donate today to protect a free press, uphold democracy and unearth untold stories.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.