Critics Call ‘King’s Speech’ Historically Incorrect
With "The King's Speech" sitting comfortably atop this year's heap of Oscar-nominated films, it's not surprising that there might be some grumbles from critical corners about the movie's actual merits But in this case, a couple prominent voices .
With “The King’s Speech” sitting comfortably atop this year’s heap of Oscar-nominated films, it’s not surprising that there might be some grumbles from critical corners about the movie’s actual merits. But in this case, a couple prominent voices are crying foul about the extent to which the historical drama claims cinematic license, particularly with regard to the character and allegiances of stammering King George VI. –KA
Your support is crucial...The Wrap:
It’s as predictable as the Oscars themselves. A new front-runner often means some fresh round of attacks, and the charge of historical distortion is a perennial one.
In this case, intellectual gadfly Christopher Hitchens and the New York Review of Books’ Martin Filler are charging that the monarch in question was no better than a Nazi appeaser and, in Filler’s words, “a nitwit.” They paint a portrait of the wartime king that is far different from the shy family man essayed by Oscar nominee (and favorite) Colin Firth.
“‘The King’s Speech’ …perpetrates a gross falsification of history,” Hitchens wrote on Slate on Monday, saying the king was not worthy of hagiography. Fillers says the king had an uncontrollable temper and even struck his wife.
As we navigate an uncertain 2025, with a new administration questioning press freedoms, the risks are clear: our ability to report freely is under threat.
Your tax-deductible donation enables us to dig deeper, delivering fearless investigative reporting and analysis that exposes the reality beneath the headlines — without compromise.
Now is the time to take action. Stand with our courageous journalists. Donate today to protect a free press, uphold democracy and uncover the stories that need to be told.
Audiences tend to view apocalyptic stories as fantasy. Bong Joon-ho's landmark film makes the case that we're already living in a dystopia.
This year's telecast showed signs of progress—now the Academy Awards producers need to get audiences to tune in again.
“It was too predictable, too white and too boring,” says founder of a website devoted to awards show news.
Another public debate has erupted on Twitter about the need for diversity in the entertainment industry—with the author as instigator.
Martin Scorsese's "The Irishman," Quentin Tarantino's "Once Upon a Time...in Hollywood" and Sam Mendes' "1917" each earn 10 nods apiece.
The interracial road trip drama, directed by Peter Farrelly, has been dismissed by some as an outdated inversion of "Driving Miss Daisy."
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.