Court Rules Against FCC Censorship
In a landmark ruling, a federal appeals court has sided with broadcasters against the Federal Communications Commission on the issue of indecency, saying the regulatory body has not adequately explained how the Constitution could permit the censorship of "indecent" language.
In a landmark ruling, a federal appeals court has sided with broadcasters against the Federal Communications Commission on the issue of indecency, saying the regulatory body has not adequately explained how the Constitution could permit the censorship of “indecent” language.
WAIT, BEFORE YOU GO…Washington Post:
A federal appeals court tossed out an indecency ruling against Rupert Murdoch’s Fox television network [Monday] and broadly questioned whether the Federal Communications Commission has the right to police the airwaves for offensive language.
In a 2 to 1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in New York ruled that the FCC went too far in issuing a 2006 decision against Fox Broadcasting for separate incidents in 2002 and 2003 after singer Cher and celebrity Nicole Richie each uttered an expletive on live television.
The ruling is a rebuke to the FCC and a victory for television networks, which in recent years have pushed back against the FCC’s crackdown on indecency. In 2004, the agency reversed years of policy and effectively branded even “fleeting,” or one-time, use of an expletive off-limits on broadcast television and radio, angering Hollywood, which warned of a chilling effect on programming.
If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Ear to the Ground
As the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens, a pattern of suppression is evident toward journalists and employees who advocate for Palestinian rights.
Film Review
The urgent Indian documentary “While We Watched” captures journalism under fire.
Opinion
Extreme, pro-censorship authoritarians are ringing in July 4 by calling for book bans.
Ear to the Ground
The Governor of the Sunshine state is pandering to the most extreme elements in his party.
Book Excerpt
How the FBI relied on an Icelandic criminal and diagnosed sociopath to indict Julian Assange, and met unusual resistance from the Icelandic government.
TD Original
This weekend, as the town of Chardon braced itself for more violence, photojournalist Michael Nigro was on the scene to get the story.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.