Court Orders Government to Release Secret Drone Assassination Memo
The government has claimed every legal right to kill American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki without a trial, but has so far refused to release the actual memo granting permission.
The government has claimed every legal right to kill American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki without a trial, but has so far refused to release the actual memo granting permission.
On Monday, a federal appeals court in New York ruled that a redacted version of the document, which has been sought by The New York Times and the American Civil Liberties Union, ought to come out. According to a report in the Times, the three-judge panel reasoned that the government had already outlined its legal reasoning in a white paper and numerous public statements:
The unanimous three-judge panel, reversing a lower court decision, said the government had waived its right to keep the analysis secret in light of numerous public statements by administration officials and the Justice Department’s release of a “white paper” offering a detailed analysis of why targeted killings were legal.
“Whatever protection the legal analysis might once have had,” Judge Jon O. Newman wrote for the panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, “has been lost by virtue of public statements of public officials at the highest levels and official disclosure of the D.O.J. White Paper.”
It is doubtful that the document’s release will alter the government’s drone assassination program in any significant way, or that we will learn dramatic new details about President Barack Obama’s kill list. However, the ruling is certainly a blow to the government’s abuse of secrecy, which began long before the Obama administration but has only grown more ubiquitous in recent years.
— Posted by Peter Z. Scheer
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
Ear to the Ground
A new bill would inscribe a “right to housing” in the Golden State’s constitution.
The decision conflicts with those by three other federal appeals courts.
The lawsuit centers on two trans sprinters who have frequently outperformed their cisgender competitors.
A ProPublica investigation reveals how Border Patrol's nearly unchecked powers over the fate of migrants is tearing families apart.
The U.S. war on the free press, free speech, and dissent more generally, are all rooted in the so-called "Good War."
Gov. J.B. Pritzker's newly signed legislation seeks to break the link between income level and access to mobility and valid identification.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.