Classic Scheer Interviews From ‘Playing President’
In a 1980 interview between George HW Bush and then-LA Times reporter Robert Scheer, Bush revealed his belief in a winnable nuclear war--which many observers think lost him the Republican nomination to Ronald Reagan Check out this interview and many more in Scheer's new book "Playing President".
In the below exchange, excerpted from a 1980 interview between George H.W. Bush and then-L.A. Times reporter Robert Scheer, Bush revealed his belief in a winnable nuclear war–which many observers think lost him the Republican nomination to Ronald Reagan. Check out this interview and many more in Scheer’s new book “Playing President: My Close Encounters with Nixon, Carter, Bush I, Reagan, and Clinton–and How They Did Not Prepare Me for George W. Bush.”
“Bush Assails Carter Defense Strategy”
(Originally published on the front page of The Los Angeles Times on January 24, 1980.)
… Scheer: Don?t we reach a point with these strategic weapons where we can wipe each other out so many times and no one wants to use them or is willing to use them, that it really doesn?t matter whether we?re ten percent or two percent lower or higher?
Bush: Yes, if you believe there is no such thing as a winner in a nuclear exchange, that argument makes little sense. I don?t believe that.
Scheer: How do you win a nuclear exchange?
Bush: You have a survivability of command in control, survivability of industrial potential, protection of a percentage of your citizens, and you have a capability that inflicts more damage on the opposition than it can inflict upon you. That?s the way you can have a winner, and that Soviets? planning is based on the ugly concept of a winner in a nuclear exchange.
Scheer: Do you mean like five percent would survive? Two percent?
Bush: More than that?if everybody fired everything they had, you?d have more than that survive.
Want to read the whole thing? Pick up an autographed copy of “Playing President” in the Truthdig bazaar.
WAIT, BEFORE YOU GO…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
The move, coming as demonstrators mark the 40th anniversary of the U.S. Embassy siege, further weakens the pact Donald Trump withdrew from.
Mainstream outlets’ coverage of U.S.-Iran relations are augmenting the Trump administration’s provocations at a critical moment.
More than 30 years after it exploded, the nuclear disaster site still casts a baleful shadow over many.
As AI plays an increasing role in military affairs, human roles, even in nuclear decision-making, are likely to be progressively diminished.
Nobody knows what to do with a vast uranium and plutonium stockpile built up in the U.K. by reprocessing spent fuel.
Facing a world in which there are now two forms of potential humanly induced annihilation --- the fast and slow ones --- I don’t simply want to dump them on my son.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.