Clarence Thomas, You Have the Right to Remain Silent
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas hasn't asked a question during oral arguments in five years. Why the silent treatment? To paraphrase Thomas, why beat up on the visiting lawyers when you already have your mind made up? (more)
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas hasn’t asked a question during oral arguments in five years. Why the silent treatment? To paraphrase Thomas, why beat up on the visiting lawyers when you already have your mind made up?
Thomas is not required to ask questions, but it does strike some of the people who keep track of these things as a bit weird. According to a professor of political science quoted by ABC News: “No single justice has gone even one full term without asking a question in the last 40 years.”
Your support matters…ABC News:
Thomas has said that he goes into the oral argument sessions knowing how he will decide a case, so he doesn’t ask questions.
“So why do you beat up on people if you already know … [the outcome of the case]? I don’t know because I don’t beat up on them. I refuse to participate. I don’t like it, so I don’t do it,” he said in 2009, according to The Associated Press.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Courts & Law
If re-elected, he could nominate James Ho, perhaps the country’s most reactionary federal appellate judge.
Courts & Law
Interviews and newly unearthed documents reveal that Thomas threatened to leave the court over financial woes.
Editorial Cartoons
Courts & Law
Experts say it is unclear if the new rules would address the issues raised by the recent revelations without clarity on enforcement.
Courts & Law
"It's time for Senate leaders to step in and do something," said one campaigner. "If the court cannot act in an ethical manner, then Congress must act now."
Courts & Law
The inside story of how one man built a machine that remade the American legal system — and what he plans to do next.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.