Civilians ‘Terrorized’ in Pakistan Drone War
NYU law professor Sarah Knuckey, one of the authors of a new report on the social effects of America’s drone war in Pakistan, talks about the “broad mental health impacts” on people who live in fear of deadly attacks from the sky 24 hours a day.
New York University law professor Sarah Knuckey, one of the authors of a new report on the social effects of America’s drone war in Pakistan, talks about the “broad mental health impacts” on people who live in fear of deadly attacks from the sky 24 hours a day.
The U.S. drone campaign “terrorize[s] men, women, and children, giving rise to anxiety and psychological trauma among civilian communities,” says the report, co-written by James Cavallaro, director of the International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic at Stanford University. Researchers conducted interviews with roughly 70 individuals who have had direct and devastating encounters with America’s unmanned planes.
“Because the drones are very precise, in a certain sense, you never know whether it might hit your vehicle or your home or your child’s school,” Knuckey told “Democracy Now!” “Even the medical doctors and journalists felt, even though they knew they were safer than most civilians, that they felt unable to go about their daily lives without a constant sense of fear.
“Because of that fear, people change their daily practices in really important ways. Medical doctors will not go to a drone strike zone within six hours, because they fear being themselves struck in a secondary strike. Journalists and medical doctors, when they go to the market, when they drive their car, they feel this fear. Some parents admitted — and they were embarrassed to admit this, but they admitted that they wouldn’t send their children to school at certain times, because they were worried about strikes. The jurga, which is an extremely important community mechanism for resolving disputes—there was a significant strike on a jurga. Those people said they had the jurga in a public place because they felt safe, they knew they were civilian. But they were hit, and so now people are afraid to meet in public spaces to resolve disputes.”
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Democracy Now!
WAIT, BEFORE YOU GO…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Opinion
President Biden's rules on drone warfare mask continued violent Islamophobia.
Politics
Obama's only takeaway from the Syria episode was to never again seek Congressional approval for military action.
The president’s foreign policy seldom matches his anti-war rhetoric. In 2020, it’s incumbent on his opposition to offer a true alternative.
There’s a lot about our wars that we don’t know, but what we do know is enough to make a person cry.
The president's 2020 opponents would do well to watch his moves on the international front, as they could help his re-election cause.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.