Cheney’s Twisted Logic
Vice President Dick Cheney has once again confused supporting the troops with supporting a surge of troops into Iraq "Anyone can say they support the troops But the proof will come when it's time to provide the money and the support," Cheney said, referring to a bill that would fund the escalation.
Vice President Dick Cheney has once again confused supporting the troops with supporting a surge of troops into Iraq. “Anyone can say they support the troops … . But the proof will come when it’s time to provide the money and the support,” Cheney said, referring to a bill that would fund the escalation.
If his administration’s record is any indication, keeping the troops far away from the maelstrom of Iraq is the best support they could possibly hope for.
Your support matters…AP:
While noting that the House already had passed a nonbinding resolution voicing opposition to Bush’s Iraq policy, Cheney said that “very soon both houses of Congress will have to vote on a piece of legislation that is binding.”
The legislation would, among other things, help pay for the additional 21,500 troops Bush is sending to Iraq.
“I sincerely hope the discussion this time will be about winning in Iraq, not about posturing on Capitol Hill. Anyone can say they support the troops, and we should take them at their word. But the proof will come when it’s time to provide the money and the support,” Cheney said. “We expect the House and the Senate to meet those needs on time and in full.”
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Trump has lifted restraints on field commanders and let the military send more personnel to the Middle East.
Key to Barack Obama's surge is his expansion of targeted assassinations taking place under the guise of unmanned aerial drones operating in the Af-Pak region. Obama's senseless Afghanistan strategy will expand the use of targeted assassinations by aerial drones.
Something just doesn't add up about the stated logic of sending 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan, says Jamal Dajani, who has a theory about the president's real reason for escalating the war.
Even if the surge works, why wouldn't al-Qaida -- or some like-minded group -- simply set up shop in Somalia? Or in Yemen, another failing state?
The other "peace candidate" in the 2008 Democratic primary isn't thrilled with the president's order to radically escalate the war in Afghanistan, no matter if there's an exit strategy: "What are we going to learn in 18 months that we haven't already learned in the last eight years?"Rep. Dennis Kucinich asks: "What are we going to learn in 18 months that we haven't already learned in the last eight years?"
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.