Subscribe

Bush Inventing Reasons to Oppose Stem Cell Research

Don’t both Bush with new facts; his mind’s made up.

Even though scientists have discovered a way to experiment on stem cells without killing viable embryos, Bush still opposes the research, for maddeningly opaque reasons. A spokesperson tried to say it’s because the research wasn’t peer-reviewed, but that’s just false.


ThinkProgress:

News stories today report that biologists have ?developed a technique for establishing colonies of human embryonic stem cells from an early human embryo without destroying it.?

The Bush administration has repeatedly stated that it opposes expanded embryonic stem cell research because it would involve destroying human embryos. On July 18, when asked why President Bush opposed a stem cell bill, White House Press Secretary Tony Snow replied, ?The simple answer is he thinks murder is wrong.? The next day, Bush vetoed HR 810:

… Emily Lawrimore, a White House spokeswoman, suggested that the new procedure would not satisfy the objections of Mr. Bush. ? Though Ms. Lawrimore called it encouraging that scientists were moving away from destroying embryos, she said: ?Any use of human embryos for research purposes raises serious ethical questions. This technique does not resolve those concerns.?

This new excuse is hopelessly vague. Lawrimore provided no elaboration on what those ?ethical questions? and ?concerns? exactly were. As Dr. Robert Lanza, who led the breakthrough project, stated, ?There is no rational reason left to oppose this research.?

Link

In this article:

Now you can personalize your Truthdig experience. To bookmark your favorite articles, please create a user profile.

Personalize your Truthdig experience. Choose authors to follow, bookmark your favorite articles and more.
Your Truthdig, your way. Access your favorite authors, articles and more.
or
or

A password will be e-mailed to you.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles and comments are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.