Bernie, Don't Endorse Hillary Before the Convention!

Bernie Sanders speaks at a rally at Town Hall in New York City. (Dennis Van Tine / STAR MAX / IPx)

This piece first appeared at LA Progressive.

If Senator Sanders endorses Mrs. Clinton, it should be expected that some percentage of delegates would not show up in Philly, and many of those who do will be harboring great resentment towards the campaign itself. Millions of voters will instantly retreat to the resignation and despair with party politics that they harbored before this campaign. The momentum of this revolution will largely come to an end. Base supporters will effectively be returned to the masses of disenchanted potential voters who justifiably feel that most politicians can’t be trusted, because they so frequently sell out when they’re most needed. Over the last 13 months, I’ve managed hundreds of volunteers. Dozens of them have individually expressed to me and others that they would “burn their Bernie shirts if he ever endorsed the epitome of everything we’re fighting against.” Nobody is immune to the backlash of endorsing the nation’s most corrupt politician, even the father of OUR political revolution. Most of the 13 million people who voted for Senator Sanders had not heard of him before he announced his candidacy. To these people, he represents more than just the social and environmental issues that resonate with them. He represents the very notion that there can still be integrity in the US Congress. If he endorses the very establishment candidate he railed against, he could lose those people to politics forever.

—Posted on the Confirmed California Bernie Delegates Facebook page by a delegate from Northern California.

As a longtime supporter and super volunteer, I would like to thank you for fighting on behalf of the 99% and for awakening millions of people, especially young people to the fact that establishment politics no longer works for the vast majority of the American people. I also want to thank you and your platform committee members for making the Democratic platform the most progressive platform in history. However, we all know that the platform is an aspirational document that the President and the party can ignore. As a pledged delegate from California, I want to go to the convention in Philadelphia in two weeks and fight for your nomination, as I was elected to do. As such, I am alarmed by what I have been reading about your possible endorsement of Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire tomorrow. I am asking that you hold off on an endorsement until after the vote, that you not place her name into nomination using a vote by acclamation and that you exercise your option afforded you by the minority report signed at the platform committee meeting to force a vote on the Hightower amendment opposing the TPP in Philadelphia. Bernie, we have met five times now. The first time in April of 2011, I asked you to challenge Obama in the 2012 primary. By October of that year, I had joined the Occupy movement, because I believed we needed a social movement to challenge corporate control of our government and our economy. While the Occupy movement did not get involved with electoral politics, it is widely credited with changing the national conversation and setting the stage for your candidacy in 2016. In October of 2014, I asked you to consider running as an Independent so you could lead a movement and not just an electoral campaign. You replied that you had heard that from many people and were considering it. Six months later, when you decided to run as a Democrat, I understood why. You know that third parties are marginalized in this country. You believed that you needed to be included in the debates and get covered by the media to get your message out. Ironically, the DNC stacked the deck against you by limiting the number of debates and scheduling them on holiday weekends or opposite football games. And the corporate media barely covered you. (A recent Harvard study showed that this lack of coverage hindered your chances of becoming the Democratic nominee; whereas constant coverage of Trump led to his becoming the GOP nominee.) Even so, through the sheer power of your authentic, consistent and compassionate message, you were able to lead a movement, and millions of people from all generations responded to your call for a political revolution and volunteered for your campaign. You won 13 million votes, 23 states and 45% of the delegates, unprecedented in the modern history of insurgent campaigns. When you ran as a Democrat, I and many others, defended you against naysayers on the left who said it is impossible to lead a revolution from inside one of the two corporate parties, citing the failures of Jesse Jackson and Dennis Kucinich. They went further and said you were sheep herding people into that corporate party only to eventually turn around and endorse Hillary Clinton if you were to fail to get the nomination. I said it was my goal to get people who only come out every four or eight years when they get excited about a candidate to become activists on the issues like fracking and the TPP. However I realized while many people parroted your slogan “Not Me, Us,” they were still looking to you for leadership. Few were joining the fights, at least here in Los Angeles. They were waiting for you to stop the TPP when you got elected. People worked very hard on your campaign. However, it was not enough to get you the nomination. Many of your supporters decried sabotage by the DNC, the unfairness of the super delegate system, insufficient and disparaging coverage by the mainstream media and election fraud in many states. In the end, they pinned their hopes on the FBI recommending a Clinton indictment, the California recount flipping the state to you or your taking up Jill Stein’s offer to top the ticket of the Green Party. Much wishful and even magical thinking ensued. Even now people refuse to believe that you could possibly endorse Clinton tomorrow, calling it “more media lies.” Wait, before you go…

If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.

Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.

Support Truthdig 1 2

In this Article: