Arizona Legislators Vote Down Anti-Immigration Bills
Arizona lawmakers did a 180 on Thursday, voting to reject new anti-immigrant measures in a move ostensibly in response to the harsh economic realities of the state’s budget and unrelenting pressure by human rights groups.
Arizona lawmakers did a 180 on Thursday, voting to reject new anti-immigrant measures in a move ostensibly in response to the harsh economic realities of the state’s budget and unrelenting pressure by human rights groups. –JCL
Your support matters…The New York Times:
Arizona established itself over the past year as the most aggressive state in cracking down on illegal immigrants, gaining so much momentum with its efforts that several other states vowed to follow suit. But now the harsh realities of economics appear to have intruded, and Arizona may be looking to shed the image of hard-line anti-immigration pioneer.
In an abrupt change of course, Arizona lawmakers rejected new anti-immigration measures on Thursday, in what was widely seen as capitulation to pressure from business executives and an admission that the state’s tough stance had resulted in a chilling of the normally robust tourism and convention industry.
The State Senate voted down five bills that among other things sought to require hospitals to inform law enforcement officials when treating patients suspected of being in the country illegally and to prod the Supreme Court to rule against automatic citizenship for American-born children of illegal immigrants.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Editorial Cartoons
Editorial Cartoons
Women
The ruling by the Arizona Supreme Court claims the Civil War-era law, which prevents the termination of a pregnancy even in cases of rape or incest, must stand.
Will it be the corporate establishment or working people? How the Massachusetts senator chooses could determine the Democratic nomination.
A new investigation finds the former Trump adviser used a private jet owned by a wealthy Chinese businessman during the midterm elections.
This marks the first time waivers have applied to federal procurement rules. Previously ones waived environmental impact reviews.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.