Are Think Tanks Selling Influence to Foreign Powers?
More than a dozen D.C. think tanks on which experts rely for independent research and policy analysis "have received tens of millions of dollars from foreign governments in recent years while pushing United States government officials to adopt policies that often reflect the donors' priorities," a New York Times investigation found.
More than a dozen prominent Washington, D.C., think tanks on which experts have long relied for independent research and policy analysis “have received tens of millions of dollars from foreign governments in recent years while pushing United States government officials to adopt policies that often reflect the donors’ priorities,” a New York Times investigation found.
The arrangements involve the capital’s most influential think tanks, including the Brookings Institution, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Atlantic Council and the Center for Global Development. The paper reports that “each is a major recipient of overseas funds, producing policy papers, hosting forums and organizing private briefings for senior United States government officials that typically align with the foreign governments’ agendas.”
Most of the money comes from countries in Europe, the Middle East and Asia, including the oil-producing nations of the UAE, Qatar and Norway.
The Times continues:
The money is increasingly transforming the once-staid think-tank world into a muscular arm of foreign governments’ lobbying in Washington. And it has set off troubling questions about intellectual freedom: Some scholars say they have been pressured to reach conclusions friendly to the government financing the research.
The think tanks do not disclose the terms of the agreements they have reached with foreign governments. And they have not registered with the United States government as representatives of the donor countries, an omission that appears, in some cases, to be a violation of federal law, according to several legal specialists who examined the agreements at the request of The Times.
Consequently, policymakers who rely on the groups are not necessarily informed that foreign governments are funding the research.
The Times quoted Joseph Sandler, a lawyer and expert on the rules that govern Americans lobbying for foreign governments, as saying the arrangements “opened a whole new window into an aspect of the influence-buying in Washington that has not previously been exposed.
“It is particularly egregious because with a law firm or lobbying firm, you expect them to be an advocate,” Sandler added. “Think tanks have this patina of academic neutrality and objectivity, and that is being compromised.”
Read more here.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
The foreign funding of think tanks is a vital part of the way other governments try to influence policy in this country.
The state’s stagnant funds could be put to good and much-needed work through a publicly owned bank—instead of being put at high risk through investment in public-private partnerships.
A fundamental battle for democracy is in progress—a conflict over superdelegates to the Democratic Party's national convention in 2020.
When will the senator acknowledge Saudi Arabia's abuses in the poorest country in the Arab world and act?
The interests of the working class were supposed to be the focus of the Trump administration, but the president has no coherent approach for lifting up blue-collar Americans.
An early draft of the closed-door talk the presidential candidate gave at a forum created by Haim Saban -- a pro-Israel billionaire -- included several paragraphs on Palestinian freedom Then it was editedAn early draft of the closed-door talk the presidential candidate gave at a forum created by Haim Saban—a pro-Israel billionaire—included several paragraphs on Palestinian freedom.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.