AP Writer Razzed, Praised for Obama Speech Analysis
Was he tone-deaf or spot-on? Or, worse, did AP writer Charles Babington prepare his reaction to Barack Obama's nomination acceptance speech not by listening to the address but by reading the transcript before Obama actually delivered it? And just who is this Charles Babington anyway?
Was he tone-deaf or spot-on? Or, worse, did AP writer Charles Babington prepare his reaction to Barack Obama’s nomination acceptance speech not by listening to the address but by reading the transcript before Obama actually delivered it? And just who is this Charles Babington anyway? These questions and more were bandied about on various outlets and blogs over the ensuing hours after Babington’s review hit the news wires to be picked up by newspapers around the country.
First, here’s Babington’s story:
AP via Google News:
Barack Obama, whose campaign theme is “change we can believe in,” promised Thursday to “spell out exactly what that change would mean.”
But instead of dwelling on specifics, he laced the crowning speech of his long campaign with the type of rhetorical flourishes that Republicans mock and the attacks on John McCain that Democrats cheer. The country saw a candidate confident in his existing campaign formula: tie McCain tightly to President Bush, and remind voters why they are unhappy with the incumbent.
Now, let’s take a look at the Babington Effect on the blogosphere and the, uh … newsosphere:
1) As Indecision 2008 writer Dylan Ris notes, Babington wasn’t exactly preaching to the choir when it came to some of Obama’s potential critics: conservatives. After all, even right-wing papa bear Pat Buchanan was a fan of the Obama speech!
2) CBS’ Steve Benen has some tough love for the AP.
3) Gawker offers one possible explanation: Babington didn’t see the same speech the rest of the country did.
4) A roundup in USNews.com on Friday makes the case that praise of Obama’s speech was bipartisan.
5) Editor & Publisher published reader reactions to their own story about Keith Olbermann’s thunderous on-air “smackdown” of Babington Thursday night.
6) Meanwhile, Fox News managed to make a pop culture reference from within the last 30 years in an article supporting Babington’s report.
Your support matters…Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
The U.S. cannot violate its international agreements, only withdraw from them. That's our political press' story, and it's sticking to it.
No matter how egregious the remarks or transparent the speaker's motivations, the press cannot bring itself to call out racism by its name.
The wire service conveniently omits that Trump's pick for attorney general pardoned six officials for their role in the Iran-Contra affair.
An exclusive new report finds the multinational is storing your location data—even when you explicitly tell it not to.
Police block off streets and mobilize hundreds of officers one year after white supremacist violence roiled the Virginia city. Some activists fear the heavy police presence could be counterproductive.
Just because Donald Trump is using the recent chemical attack as an excuse to bomb Syria does not mean the attack didn't happen. We need to acknowledge the reality of Syrian suffering at the hands of Assad, Putin and the U.S.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.