Airstrikes Alone Aren’t Enough in Eastern Libya
The fight in Libya is moving closer to the ground as NATO commanders admitted Tuesday that airstrikes alone cannot hold back Moammar Gadhafi’s powerful attacks on rebel-held Misrata. (more)
The fight in Libya is moving closer to the ground as NATO commanders admitted Tuesday that airstrikes alone cannot hold back Moammar Gadhafi’s powerful attacks on rebel-held Misrata, where hospitals are overwhelmed with casualties, while Britain said it will dispatch senior military officers to advise the opposition.
Misrata, Libya’s third-largest city, has been under siege for nearly two months, with rebels holding on to seaside positions in the port area. In recent days, Libyan troops have pounded the city with shells and rockets.
AP reported that NATO officials have acknowledged difficulty in trouble destroying Gadhafi’s mortars and rocket launchers from the air, for fear of harming civilians in such strikes.
“There is a limit to what can be achieved by airpower to stop fighting in a city,” said NATO Brig. Gen. Mark van Uhm.
Given NATO’s humanitarian mandate reflecting the U.N. Security Council resolution on Libya, which does not allow ground forces, “It’s very difficult” to stop the regime’s firepower on Misrata, he said.
Meanwhile, Britain has committed senior military officers to Benghazi, also in the rebel-held east. The Telegraph reports some British MPs are concerned about a Vietnam-style quagmire as the U.K. commits to an extended ground presence in Libya. — KDG
Wait, before you go…If you're reading this, you probably already know that non-profit, independent journalism is under threat worldwide. Independent news sites are overshadowed by larger heavily funded mainstream media that inundate us with hype and noise that barely scratch the surface. We believe that our readers deserve to know the full story. Truthdig writers bravely dig beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that tells you what’s really happening and who’s rolling up their sleeves to do something about it.
Like you, we believe a well-informed public that doesn’t have blind faith in the status quo can help change the world. Your contribution of as little as $5 monthly or $35 annually will make you a groundbreaking member and lays the foundation of our work.
Support Truthdig
Born to a sharecropper, the chair of the House Oversight and Reform Committee was a tireless advocate for the nation's most disadvantaged.
Under siege by a rapacious billionaire class, America finds itself at risk of sliding into autocracy like countless nations before it.
We need to rethink the asymmetry in the behavior of our two parties.
Do your own research, question everything and reach conclusions based on facts, not on what you read on Facebook.
Hillary Clinton has had ethical lapses, but when it comes to sleaze and cutting corners, the Republican candidate is No. 1.
The former secretary of state spoke haltingly but had clearly rehearsed her answers Meanwhile, Trump initially demonstrated that it's possible to swagger sitting down, but he came up short in his responses to crucial questions about his preparedness—and about Russian President Vladimir Putin UpdatedThe former secretary of state spoke haltingly but had clearly rehearsed her answers.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.