Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 20, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

Sen. Elizabeth Warren's Supreme Court Warning

Warren Opposes Obama Nominee, Lawmaker Urges Gender-Role Class for Kids, and More

Quelle Surprise! Haiti on the Mend

How American University Got Involved in Israel's Public Interest

Most Comments
Most Emailed




The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Uncovered

The Alito Nomination

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr., currently serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, has been nicknamed “Scalito,” or “little Scalia,” by some lawyers.  Bush’s second pick for the Supreme Court seat to be vacated by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor is meant to please his right-wing base in the GOP, but how would Alito tip the scales?  We’ve compiled some of his rulings and articles that may indicate how he would interpret the law from the high court bench.  If you spot something you think we should add, let us know at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

HEARINGS

Schedule | The schedule for Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito’s confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee:

  • Tuesday: 9:30 a.m. Questioning begins with each of the committee’s 18 senators getting a 30-minute round. It will continue into night, with a dinner break from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m.
  • Wednesday: 9:30 a.m. Twenty-minute rounds of questioning begin. At 7 p.m., questioning resumes after a dinner break. If questioning is completed, the committee will go into closed session to review Alito’s FBI background check.
  • Thursday: 9:30 a.m. More questioning of Alito or closed session if necessary. Questioning of outside witnesses.
  • Friday: The confirmation hearing continues, if necessary.
  • Monday, Jan. 16: Martin Luther King Jr. holiday; no committee meeting.
  • Tuesday, Jan. 17: The committee meets, possible vote.
  • Where to watch or listen to Alito hearings:
    C-SPAN
    KCET.com
    KCRW
    NPR

     

    BIOGRAPHICAL INFO

    Official White House Bio

    DOCUMENTS

    National Archives: Records Pertaining to Judge Samuel Alito Jr.

    Response to a Senate Judiciary Committee Questionnaire
    Nov. 30 2005 | Document (PDF), (Appendix1, Appendix2, Appendix3, Appendix4)

    Personal Statement on Abortion
    Nov. 15, 1985 | From FindLaw: “Pres. Bush’s U.S. Supreme Court nominee, Judge Samuel Alito, Jr., wrote in his ‘Personal Qualifications Statement’ when applying to be an Assistant Attorney General under Pres. Ronald Reagan that “I am and always have been a conservative” and that he was “particularly proud of my contributions in recent cases in which the government has argued in the Supreme Court that racial and ethnic quotas should not be allowed, and that the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion.” more

    Memos: Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 1985
    May 30, 1985 | Released on Nov. 30, 2005:Memorandum concerning Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, No. 84-495 and Diamond v. Charles, No. 84-1379 from Samuel A. Alito to the Solicitor General

    June 3, 1985| Released on Nov. 30, 2005: Memorandum to Samuel A. Alito, Charles J. Cooper, Kenneth Cribb, Stephen Galebach, Carolyn Kuhl, William B. Reynolds and Richard Willard from Charles Fried regarding Samuel Alito’s recommendation in the abortion cases.

    Memos: Marsh v. Flint Board of Education, 1985
    Aug. 1, 1985 |Buck-slips and hand-written note by Alito. Also includes a printed copy of Supreme Court Petition of Writ of Certiorari concerning Marsh v. Board of Education of the City of Flint

    Memos: Memphis Police v. Garner, 1984
    May 24, 1984 | Memorandum concerning Tennessee & Memphis Police Department v. Garner from Brian K. Landsberg to William Bradford Reynolds.

    May 18, 1984 |Memorandum concerning Memphis Department v. Garner, Nos. 83-1035, 83-1070 from Samuel A. Alito to the Solicitor General

    COURT DECISIONS

    Shore Regional High School Board of Education v. P.S., on Behalf of P.S.
    Aug. 20, 2004 | Alito rules in favor of a complaint brought under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act by a boy seeking legal relief from bullying by classmates.

    The Pitt News v. Pappert
    Jan. 22, 2004 | A First Amendment case dealing with a law banning alcoholic beverage ads in media affiliated with educational institutions.

    Ronald A. Williams v. Price, Fisher
    Sept. 9, 2003 | Majority opinion granting federal court review to an African American who could not get state courts to hear his claim of racial bias on the part of a juror in his trial.

    Saxe v. State College Area School District
    Feb. 14, 2001 | A First Amendment and anti-harassment case.

    ACLU v. Schundler
    Aug. 6, 1998 | Holds that holiday display in Jersey City, N.J. that included a creche and menorah and secular symbols did not violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment.

    Sheridan v. Dupont
    May 4, 1995 | Dissents, argues that the Third Circuit had made it too easy for discrimination complaints to reach a jury trial.

    Planned Parenthood v. Casey
    1991 | Dissenting opinion concerning “spousal notification” and abortion.
    June 29, 1992 | Dissenting opinion referenced in U.S. Supreme Court ruling

    RELATED SITES

    Alito: FindLaw
    Profile as well as in-depth case analysis and linked opinions.

    KEY TOPICS

     

    PRESIDENTIAL POWER

    Focus of Hearings Quickly Turns to Limits of Presidential Power
    Jan. 10, 2006 |  “The opinion is more than 50 years old, and it is not even binding precedent. But just minutes into the Supreme Court confirmation hearings of Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr., it took center stage and seemed to lay the groundwork for the questions he will face concerning his views on the limits of presidential power.” more

    Alito Once Made Case For Presidential Power
    By Christopher Lee for the Washington Post: “As a young Justice Department lawyer, Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr. tried to help tip the balance of power between Congress and the White House a little more in favor of the executive branch.” more

    George W. Bush, Edgar Allan Poe, and the Use and Abuse of Presidential Signing
    By Phillip J. Cooper for Presidential Studies Quarterly. This article by Cooper is frequently cited by journalists writing about the impact of Alito’s 1986 memo and his interperetation of presidential power. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Volume 35 Page 515 - September 2005 more

    ABORTION

    Alito Urged Government to Challenge Roe v. Wade
    Nov. 30, 1985 | Fred Barbash of The Washington Post reported: “Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr. was an architect of the Reagan administration’s failed 1985 attempt to have the high court consider overruling Roe v. Wade, according to a memo from the period released today.” more

    Alito Distances Himself From Views on Abortion in ‘85 Letter
    Nov.16, 2005 | Charles Babington and Charles Russakof of The Washington Post reported: “Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr. sought to distance himself yesterday from staunchly conservative views he expressed 20 years ago, but some liberals and conservatives said they see the comments as the best indication yet of judicial philosophies he would bring to the bench. One liberal group said it will use the remarks in ads opposing Alito’s confirmation.” more

    CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

    Judge Alito and the Death Penalty (pdf)
    By Goodwin Liu,  law professor at UC Berkeley’s Boalt Hall,  and Lynsay Skiba.  (Short version avaiable: “Life and Death and Samuel Alito,” L.A. TIMES, Nov. 27, 2005, at M5)

    FIRST AMENDMENT

    How Judge Alito Applied the First Amendment on Campus: His Important Decision On a Public School’s Anti-Harassment Policy
    By Julie Hilden for FindLaw: “President Bush’s current Supreme Court nominee,  Judge Samuel Alito, has so far faced intense scrutiny regarding what his views on Roe v. Wade may be. But what are his views in other types of constitutional law cases? A decision Judge Alito authored in 2001, for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, is telling both as to his temperament, and his take on the First Amendment. ” more

    RELIGION

    For Alito: The More Religion, The Better
    Nov. 17, 2005| Audio - NPR: All Things Considered by Barbara Bradley Hagerty
    “As Judge Samuel Alito preps for his Senate confirmation hearing, every word that the Supreme Court nominee has ever written has come under a microscope, including his judicial opinions about the relationship between church and state. One theme does emerge from Alito’s writings: the more religion, the better.” listen

    ___

    MORE ARTICLES ON THE WEB

    Alito Defended Wiretap Protections in ‘85 Memo
    Dec. 23, 2005 | The Associated Press reported for The New York Times: “Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito defended the right of government officials to order domestic wiretaps when he worked for the Reagan Justice Department, documents released Friday show.” more

    Alito’s Policy on Recusals is Questioned
    Dec. 6, 2005 | Michael Kranish of The Boston Globe reported: “In 1987, Samuel A. Alito Jr., then the US attorney for the district of New Jersey, signed a bank fraud indictment of a New Jersey man named Larry Kopp. Later, when Alito became a federal appeals judge, he put the Kopp case on his ‘‘standing recusal” list, seeking to uphold his promise that he would disqualify himself from any case that he had supervised as US attorney.”

    Alito’s Record Shows Long History of Conservatism
    Dec. 1, 2005 | Stephen Henderson and Howard Mintz of Knight Ridder Newspapers report: “During his 15 years on the federal bench, Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito has worked quietly but resolutely to weave a conservative legal agenda into the fabric of the nation’s laws.” more


    Alito Urged Government to Challenge Roe v. Wade
    Nov. 30, 1985 | Fred Barbash of The Washington Post reported: “Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr. was an architect of the Reagan administration’s failed 1985 attempt to have the high court consider overruling Roe v. Wade, according to a memo from the period released today.” more

    Alito Distances Himself From Views on Abortion in ‘85 Letter
    Nov.16, 2005 | Charles Babington and Charles Russakof of The Washington Post reported: “Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr. sought to distance himself yesterday from staunchly conservative views he expressed 20 years ago, but some liberals and conservatives said they see the comments as the best indication yet of judicial philosophies he would bring to the bench. One liberal group said it will use the remarks in ads opposing Alito’s confirmation.” more

    Decisions Reveal Alito’s Views on Hot-Button Issues
    Nov. 2, 2005 | Adam Liptak of The New York Times writes: “One distinct theme emerges from an examination of 15 cases decided by Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. involving abortion: his thinking is shaped by a traditional concept of marriage….” more

    Nomination to Please GOP, but Not the Dems
    Oct. 31, 2005 | Christine Hauser and David D. Kirkpatrick of The New York Times report: “President Bush nominated Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr., who currently serves on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, to the Supreme Court today, four days after his previous choice withdrew her nomination.” more

    Created on Jan. 10, 2006, last updated on Jun. 23, 2008

    More Below the Ad

    Advertisement


    New and Improved Comments

    If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

    By Save Us., February 1, 2006 at 2:58 pm Link to this comment
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Requiem of a Pseudo Democracy.

    Report this

    By J.W. Miller, January 25, 2006 at 7:02 am Link to this comment
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Filibuster Alito!!!

    Report this

    By Steven Domingos, January 18, 2006 at 3:55 pm Link to this comment
    (Unregistered commenter)

    It’s a little late of me, but here is The Yale Report on Alito:

    http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=1309257

    Report this

    By johnny hempseed luddite@smokesignal.talkingdrum, January 18, 2006 at 10:19 am Link to this comment
    (Unregistered commenter)

    The vote on Alito has been postponed a week.Time to stop grinding our teeth and call our senators.Tell Joe Lieberman what you think!
    Toll free senate phone numbers below save for future use. 800-426-8073,888-818-6641,888-355-3588,877-851-6437 The Democrats have the 41 votes they need to filibuster,all they need now is some courage!

    Report this

    By ONo, January 15, 2006 at 6:50 am Link to this comment
    (Unregistered commenter)

    Post #1 Errata: Line 2, ‘Yale’ should read ‘Princeton’.

    Report this

    By ONo, January 14, 2006 at 2:18 pm Link to this comment
    (Unregistered commenter)

    The matter of Alito was never about job-applications, conflicts of interest, Yale club membership, or even abortion. Alito is the last move to complete the check-mate, and democracy is now Dead-Man-Walking. The Gang of 14 compact, with Republicrat Lieberman in the lead, was conceived specifically to forstall filibuster, the only obstacle to Alito’s confirmation. The new Court was designed to sustain Bush vs Constitution, to provide stay-out-of-jail-free cards for the Bushies, to continue the NSA no-warrant wiretaps on politicians and journalists, and to complete the coup.

    God helps us all.

    Report this
    Newsletter

    sign up to get updates


     
     
     
     
    Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
    © 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.