The fourth Tea Party Express of the apocalypse: Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin speaks to the crowd during the kickoff of the nationwide Tea Party Express bus tour in Reno, Nev., on Oct. 18.
Congress has become the front office of the ruling class, but the corporate-funded big media broadcast the official faction fights with all the frenzy of gladiatorial combat in the Colosseum. Those who truly fight and die do so in wars beyond our borders; but the American empire is justified as a horn of plenty, pouring forth democracy and all good things upon the world. If we happen to build our military bases near oil and mineral deposits, then any question raised about American morals and motives must be an outright slander against the soldiers who sacrifice limbs and lives. Career politicians do not just wrap themselves in the flag; they wrap themselves in the flags draped on the coffins of dead soldiers. For every John McCain or John Kerry who showed real courage in battle, however misguided the war, there are scores of politicians who never served in uniform and yet campaign for votes as professional militarists.
The bloody sacrifice of the young is enshrined in national rites and monuments, so the roots of the next war always extend far back into our immense military cemeteries; and the bloody fruits of empire seem always within reach. The partisan spectacle is a fact of public life, but just as surely a grand distraction. Once in a while the news breaks that criminals exist in executive offices; but the systematic criminality of the corporate state is a subject that never needs to be censored since it would never be raised in a bipartisan debate.
In the 1980s, the triumph of reaction was blamed not only on the Republican Party but also on feminists, gay people and anti-racist activists—namely, on people who were often fighting for our lives and for basic democracy. A whole crew of straight white men cranked out columns deriding “wedge issues” and “identity politics.” Their common complaint was spelled out at greater length in books such as “The Twilight of Common Dreams” by Todd Gitlin and Michael Tomasky’s “Left for Dead: The Life, Death and Possible Resurrection of Progressive Politics in America.” Even Christopher Hitchens (who had not yet become a fellow traveler of the imperial right) was quoted in the February 1997 issue of The Progressive as saying, “I remember the first time I heard the slogan ‘the personal is political.’ I felt a deep, immediate sense of impending doom.”
In “The Queer Question: Essays on Desire and Democracy” (South End Press, 1997) I suggested those writers were defending their own brand of identity politics. The danger of playing any identity as a trump card in a political poker game is real, but any claim to represent “the universal left” must also remain open to question. For the sake of brevity, I will summarize the case for a social democracy founded on social pluralism with a quote from Sartre’s “Anti-Semite and Jew,” written just after World War II:
Advertisement
“What we propose is a concrete liberalism. By that we mean that all persons who through their work collaborate toward the greatness of a country have the full rights of citizens of that country. What gives them this right is not the possession of a problematical and abstract ‘human nature,’ but their active participation in the life of the society. This means, then, that the Jews—and likewise the Arabs and the Negroes—from the moment that they are participants in the national enterprise, have a right to that enterprise; they are citizens. But they have these rights as Jews, Negroes, or Arabs—that is, as concrete persons.”
If we are serious about the human dignity of “concrete persons,” we must defend fair wages and all due legal protection for immigrant workers in our country today. There is an abysmal contradiction between exploiting the labor of immigrant workers and putting targets on their backs as alien invaders. But this contradiction also serves the interests of many employers, since a work force that must pass through barbed wire fences and police dogs will have a tougher time forming a labor union. In this way bosses can have their cake and take bread from workers, too.
True, a police raid on a restaurant kitchen or a tomato farm may be a problem for an employer on that very day. But this kind of random social terrorism is also money in the bank, since the long-term suppression of wages and labor organizing is not an accidental side effect. The lords of agribusiness have a working coalition with the local police chiefs. Otherwise we must explain why fruit and vegetables keep appearing so magically in supermarkets and on dinner plates. Or why so many front lawns and golf courses remain so well tended by landscape workers from Mexico or Guatemala. Or why so many hotels, hospitals and office buildings are cleaned by people who do not earn a living wage.
Here in the southwest region of the United States, this contradiction is a Grand Canyon between liberal ideals and actual ruling-class power. In reality, the number of undocumented workers crossing over our southern border has gone down. That is not surprising, given the deep recession and the recent political campaign to give police in Arizona the power to demand identity papers at will. Even so, the fantasy of a bunker state with an Iron Wall is a convenient exit from reality, since capitalism is an essentially porous and diffuse system of profit. Corporations (and politicians of both corporate parties) placed the mobility of capital above all other considerations.
If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.
By Nelly, April 27, 2011 at 5:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
DJC: American elections don’t serve any good purpose because near every person participating in them votes defensively within the corporate party.
Those who feel this way should come live in a multi-party system with its merry-go-round elections.
It’s got so bad that some countries institute a double-barrel electoral process. The first to separate the wheat from the chaff and the second to select one of the remaining two.
Which is, some say, tantamount to our Primary System in the US. But, I tend to disagree. In a large plurality, there are more voices to be heard in the debate. But that is just the problem—too many voices lead to cacophony and thus confusion.
Perhaps the Brits are ahead of us, but, then they always had the plurality of a three-party system. The Liberal-Democrats always came in third and sometimes second, but never first. And yet, they played king-maker in the last British election.
We could as well, perhaps, establish a Social Democrat party, truly Left-of-Center, but not extreme. One that championed, for instance, a Public Health Option (as all the countries of the EU enjoy today) and nearly-free education up to and beyond post-secondary schooling. And, lest we forget, Income Fairness.
Unlike Britain, however, this would leave the traditional Democrat Party in the Center - since a Social Democrat Party would be even further to the Left.
And the beauty of this political setup is the following: Were Social Dems voted into Congress by their constituencies, then, in order to govern in Congress, the Center would have to deal with the Center-Left. And that could make all the difference. Why?
Here’s why: The Americans, in this last mid-term election, did no vote “For the Republicans” as much as they voted “Against the Democrats”. What would have been the outcome had the body-politic a third choice, the Social Democrats? Would that have brought those who stayed on the sidelines into the voting booths? Methinks, yes.
If the outcome followed the same pattern as in Europe, in stead of fleeing to the Right in disgust—many Dems would have voted further to the Left.
And the Democratic Center and Left would be in power in Congress today—With BO as PotUS.
QUOTE: mdgr wrote, “I certainly won’t be voting for [Greens] this election, partly because they don’t have it together enough to have anyone to vote for.”
___________________
The 2010 Green candidate for Governor of New York, Howie Hawkins, definitely has “it” together.
If voters had their shit together (instead of piled between their ears), Andrew Cuomo, the real retrograde (D) that the corporate party pre-installed would be in court today seeking to overturn the popular vote landslide that had truly “historically” seated Hawkins.
American elections don’t serve any good purpose because near every person participating in them votes defensively within the corporate party. The (R)s get defensive votes from the corporate party faction that fears being contaminated by depraved liberals, and the (D)s get defensive votes from the corporate party faction that fears everything that might not always be nice and very pleasant to them — and them alone — in their special backyards. The (R) and (D) voters routinely choose the dictatorship they each hope will be more benevolent to their (entitled to special privilege) corporate state supporting faction… while it’s being all the medieval malevolent it can be to everyone and everything upon the planet (including those who vote for it).
The result is regular 99% corporate (R) & (D) party popular vote mandates for a diseased global corporate culture continuum that exploits everything natural, with the same concern that cancer has for its host… a continuum that, if continued, will surely eventually result in the extermination of all of the corporate culture’s hosts. Cancer kills until it kills itself.
For elections to be useful, for some possible good, a large majority of voters need to purposefully defend natural persons and Nature (whom we all existentially depend upon), by always very aggressively voting as offensively as possible against the corporate (R) & (D) party.
There’s not much time left for natural persons to keep wasting elections.
you all can bloviate all you want about the dorky spineless dems.
TRY AS YOU LIKE, YOU CANNOT, MR AUTHOR INCLUDED, DENY THE PLAIN FACT
THAT THE REPUGS OBSTRUCTED EVERY SINGLE ISSUE THAT WAS PRESENTED. WHY
CANT PEOPLE SEE THIS GLARING TRUTH??
By Bia, November 3, 2010 at 10:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This article and this ELECTION are perfect examples of why we NEED IRV (Instant Runoff Voting) or some other system of ranked voting to re-establish our Democracy!
If everyone could have a back-up vote for their second-choice candidate, they would be free to vote their conscience as their FIRST choice without having to constantly leverage against the Spoiler Effect.
Counting would be only a little more complicated than the existing system ( First Choice gets TWO points, Second Choice gets ONE…add em up!) but well worth it for the health and RESPONSIVENESS and health of our Representative Democracy!
As it is, this Binary system of “GoodCop/BadCop only serves the power elite, especially now after the horrid SCROTUS “Citizens United” ruling allowing Corporations to rape the system with their obscenely huge and secret tonguebaths of cash!
This election has been a perfect example everything that’s WRONG with our system.
The Governments we elect are the real problem and, as it stands and without any real, radical change to this electoral system, we are just as well to pick the winning candidates, who would form a Government, out of a (un?)lucky bag.
Heaven or hell, it’s a free country and it’s your choice.
Pray tell, do explain:
* What is the purpose of “freedom” when one is incarcerated in poverty?
* What is the benefit of “choice”, when the two sole options are pathetically incompetent?
It’s time for a third-way, called Centrist. Which, summed up, means leaving the Capitalist Cash-Cow as it is, but learning how to milk it such that its produce leads to a better distribution for everyone. Communist propaganda, you think?
Not really. The above premise wont happen until Americans learn the facts about their economic predicament, which boils down to this: If you are a member of the middle and lower class of America (meaning that you earn less than $350K per year), then you a part of the 80% of Americans that are sharing 7% of the country’s financial wealth. Yep, all the rest – all 93% of it – goes to the upper-class 20% of the population. (Don’t believe that sad fact of exceptionally warped distribution of America’s Financial Wealth? Then go here.)
Now, knowing that, do explain why anyone should work themselves to exhaustion for the benefit of just 20% of the population that live off their rents? Answer: Because one does not have much choice in a highly competitive America, where the Law of the Jungle prevails far too often.
More foolish, yet, America is one of the very few countries that has such a meager number of vacation days – and yet 17% of the working population give at least 10% of their vacation time back to their employers?
That’s dumber than dumb. So, please, enough of the “Liberty Bell” BS. All that mellifluous pap for the masses is just folklore, long since past.
Our founding fathers would not recognize today the United States they worked so hard to create.
This was a nice declaration of principles and may even be a declaration of war on the elites. I’m certain in for the long haul on this struggle. We need to start at the local level and build a new way of doing business in this country.
I’ve been pondering the current rightward drift all over the world of late and have concluded that it is really a drift toward the Chinese way of doing government. I know for a fact that several governments here in Eastern Europe are seeking to emulate the Chinese model, with a single political entity closely tied to the wealthy elite of the country. Russia is almost completely there while Ukraine is making a strong move in that direction with the elections on Sunday. I also can see European politicians salivating at the idea of eliminating all this dirty, uncomfortable political wrangling and replacing it with something cleaner and easier (for them). One need not look too far to see the same ideas being pushed in America and elsewhere. And why not ... China is blowing the world apart with their state capitalist model. It’s like the wild west with the sheriff on the crook’s side.
The revolution we need to make is not one of violence although conscious civil disobedience is certainly needed. The rule of law no longer applies when the laws have been distorted and stacked against us. So we need to form small groups, like the nurses did, and then grow the organizations through affiliation and common goals. We need to make governing impossible for the elites, to throw their stupid laws and bones back in their faces. We can refuse to participate and can, eventually, win. Think about your town when most of the people refuse to go along with decisions made by your local mayor or city council. How do you think they will prevail? They can’t. If we say no, they have no choice but to go along with us. That is our revolution ... not deciding between worthless Republicans or worthless Democrats.
The republicans/most democrats can be lumped together as corporatist serial killer right wing scum. We need real democracy, which will mean the end of corporate funding, career politicians, the murdochs and coch’s and clintons, and the time when we can really rule instead of the plutocracy.
Morpheus, some of the stuff on the Revolution site is true. We could do a lot better if we used our technology to reduce work hours and supplied people fairly with the things they need instead of creating economic crises with it by reducing our workforce and lining the pockets of big business. What he’s talking about would be true democratic socialism. The problem is how you institute such a thing in a country so highly controlled as ours. I’ve been preaching this stuff for decades, but changing people’s minds is harder than finding a tea-bagger with a PH.D.
Things are only going to get worse because of you. You refuse to take any action while you wait for Democrats and Republicans to save the day. I have news for you. This is not another financial downturn or downcycle. Democrats, Republicans and economist don’t know squat.
I can relate to the deep feelings of disillusionment with our government that the author certainly felt.It seems that we are constantly going from bad to worse,and taking our government back from the wealthy elite seems to be near impossible as they control the media and suppress our rights to protest as they turn us into another third world country. We watch helplessly as our jobs are shipped overseas, our trade deficits increase and our middle class disappears. Labor unions are becoming a thing of the past as the jobs they protected vanish. In the last few decades we have watched as our government became a hollow shell, most of the functions it used to perform for the public good being privatized to corporations interested only in making as much profit as possible. We are now 47th in life expectancy in this country, and still they try to tell us we are ‘the greatest nation on earth’! I keep trying to figure out how so many of our people can be so gullible. Have we just become intellectually lazy? Has life just become too complicated, have we lost faith in ourselves? I am amazed constantly when I talk to people just how uninformed they seem to be, and just how much misinformation they seem to have absorbed. Maybe when things get bad enough, we will see a change. Maybe then a third party with the average person’s welfare in mind will become viable. I am starting to wonder just how bad things will have to get first, though!
The recent visual vividly illustrating the Obama administration’s failure, shows
Obama in a ‘backyard session’, ‘listening’ to the American people.
If President Obama had been listening for the last two years, he’d have heard
American people wanted change in three areas:
1 The American people wanted a government administered plan like Medicare -
for everyone. (72% - CBS/New York Times poll June 2009)
1A. Democrats gave private sector insurers a windfall: mandated customers, with
a taxpayer-paid overhead rate of 20% for ‘mandated customers’ (20% of our
premium spent on administration, CEO salaries, bonuses, Boards to set rates and
decide who’s covered and ‘profits’).
2 64% of the American people opposed expanding the war in Afghanistan and
wanted to disentangle from Bush-era ‘War on Terror’ and ‘preventive war’
policies.
2B. Democrats gave us an expansion of the war in Afghanistan.
3 The vast majority of Americans opposed the transfer of taxpayer wealth to
cover private company debt – the bailout.
3B. Democrats kept the 6 too-big-to-fail banks – now bigger than ever; kept
deposits at risk by maintaining huge grey areas between commercial and
investment banking; didn’t ‘punish’ the financial industry - now even more
profitable, with bonuses among the biggest ever.
None are so blind as those who will not see, nor deaf as those who will not hear.
What a choice; two corporatist parties to choose from. There doesn’t seem to be anyway to punish the sleazy Democrats without rewarding the sleazier Republicans. We deserve much better than Clinton or Obama but do deserve President Palin?
This article reflects all that is good and not so good about the Green Party.
First of all, let it be said that Scott Tucker can write. On the other hand, he is even wordier than Scott Ritter, and unlike the former, after just a little while he begins to lose the forest through the trees.
We’re talking about a serious need for an editor, and this is true for the Green Party in general. I mean, in the state of Washington, the Green’s didn’t even have a Senate candidate, and their site looked like it had been constructed by culturally deprived four year old.
They are strong on idealism, yes, but in matters of execution, they typically get lost in their own patter and become excessively cerebral. While they may be able to play three-dimensional chess in their heads, they typically are unable to put forward succinctly compelling points without inadvertently “screwing the pooch” in the presentation.
And they continue to nominate totally unelectable candidates, while patting themselves on the back and feeling very martyr-like. Still, I generally agree with the thrust of Mr. Ticker’s argument even if the Green’s are unable to maintain much of a state presence, much less a national presence. I certainly won’t be voting for them this election, partly because they don’t have it together enough to have anyone to vote for.
Excellent article and personally I came to the same conclusion for this election. I refused to be fear mongered into voting for the “lesser evil” again.
I like Nader’s suggestion also: vote your conscience.
By ralph, November 2, 2010 at 4:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Mills wrote in detail about the power elite and the masses. Written in 1956 but as fresh and pertinent as then. ” The Power Elite” says it all. Truly remarkable.
Benghazi: Dissecting Congressional Follies, Media Coverage and ‘Cover-Up’ Charges
Email 
Print
Share
Email to a friend
Newsletter 
Like Us
Follow Us
Get Our Feed
By Nelly, April 27, 2011 at 5:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s spooky how clever some ppl are. Thakns!
Report thisBy basho, November 4, 2010 at 1:03 pm Link to this comment
great article scott.
should be required reading for anyone with an attention span of more than 2 minutes.
Report thisBy Lafayette, November 4, 2010 at 8:18 am Link to this comment
A THREE PARTY SYSTEM?
Those who feel this way should come live in a multi-party system with its merry-go-round elections.
It’s got so bad that some countries institute a double-barrel electoral process. The first to separate the wheat from the chaff and the second to select one of the remaining two.
Which is, some say, tantamount to our Primary System in the US. But, I tend to disagree. In a large plurality, there are more voices to be heard in the debate. But that is just the problem—too many voices lead to cacophony and thus confusion.
Perhaps the Brits are ahead of us, but, then they always had the plurality of a three-party system. The Liberal-Democrats always came in third and sometimes second, but never first. And yet, they played king-maker in the last British election.
We could as well, perhaps, establish a Social Democrat party, truly Left-of-Center, but not extreme. One that championed, for instance, a Public Health Option (as all the countries of the EU enjoy today) and nearly-free education up to and beyond post-secondary schooling. And, lest we forget, Income Fairness.
Unlike Britain, however, this would leave the traditional Democrat Party in the Center - since a Social Democrat Party would be even further to the Left.
And the beauty of this political setup is the following: Were Social Dems voted into Congress by their constituencies, then, in order to govern in Congress, the Center would have to deal with the Center-Left. And that could make all the difference. Why?
Here’s why: The Americans, in this last mid-term election, did no vote “For the Republicans” as much as they voted “Against the Democrats”. What would have been the outcome had the body-politic a third choice, the Social Democrats? Would that have brought those who stayed on the sidelines into the voting booths? Methinks, yes.
If the outcome followed the same pattern as in Europe, in stead of fleeing to the Right in disgust—many Dems would have voted further to the Left.
And the Democratic Center and Left would be in power in Congress today—With BO as PotUS.
Report thisBy David J. Cyr, November 3, 2010 at 11:31 am Link to this comment
QUOTE: mdgr wrote, “I certainly won’t be voting for [Greens] this election, partly because they don’t have it together enough to have anyone to vote for.”
___________________
The 2010 Green candidate for Governor of New York, Howie Hawkins, definitely has “it” together.
If voters had their shit together (instead of piled between their ears), Andrew Cuomo, the real retrograde (D) that the corporate party pre-installed would be in court today seeking to overturn the popular vote landslide that had truly “historically” seated Hawkins.
American elections don’t serve any good purpose because near every person participating in them votes defensively within the corporate party. The (R)s get defensive votes from the corporate party faction that fears being contaminated by depraved liberals, and the (D)s get defensive votes from the corporate party faction that fears everything that might not always be nice and very pleasant to them — and them alone — in their special backyards. The (R) and (D) voters routinely choose the dictatorship they each hope will be more benevolent to their (entitled to special privilege) corporate state supporting faction… while it’s being all the medieval malevolent it can be to everyone and everything upon the planet (including those who vote for it).
The result is regular 99% corporate (R) & (D) party popular vote mandates for a diseased global corporate culture continuum that exploits everything natural, with the same concern that cancer has for its host… a continuum that, if continued, will surely eventually result in the extermination of all of the corporate culture’s hosts. Cancer kills until it kills itself.
For elections to be useful, for some possible good, a large majority of voters need to purposefully defend natural persons and Nature (whom we all existentially depend upon), by always very aggressively voting as offensively as possible against the corporate (R) & (D) party.
There’s not much time left for natural persons to keep wasting elections.
Report thisBy Jimnp72, November 3, 2010 at 10:29 am Link to this comment
you all can bloviate all you want about the dorky spineless dems.
Report thisTRY AS YOU LIKE, YOU CANNOT, MR AUTHOR INCLUDED, DENY THE PLAIN FACT
THAT THE REPUGS OBSTRUCTED EVERY SINGLE ISSUE THAT WAS PRESENTED. WHY
CANT PEOPLE SEE THIS GLARING TRUTH??
By Bia, November 3, 2010 at 10:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This article and this ELECTION are perfect examples of why we NEED IRV (Instant Runoff Voting) or some other system of ranked voting to re-establish our Democracy!
If everyone could have a back-up vote for their second-choice candidate, they would be free to vote their conscience as their FIRST choice without having to constantly leverage against the Spoiler Effect.
Counting would be only a little more complicated than the existing system ( First Choice gets TWO points, Second Choice gets ONE…add em up!) but well worth it for the health and RESPONSIVENESS and health of our Representative Democracy!
As it is, this Binary system of “GoodCop/BadCop only serves the power elite, especially now after the horrid SCROTUS “Citizens United” ruling allowing Corporations to rape the system with their obscenely huge and secret tonguebaths of cash!
Report thisThis election has been a perfect example everything that’s WRONG with our system.
By tedmurphy41, November 3, 2010 at 9:58 am Link to this comment
The Governments we elect are the real problem and, as it stands and without any real, radical change to this electoral system, we are just as well to pick the winning candidates, who would form a Government, out of a (un?)lucky bag.
Report thisBy Lafayette, November 3, 2010 at 5:25 am Link to this comment
VOX POPULI
Pray tell, do explain:
* What is the purpose of “freedom” when one is incarcerated in poverty?
* What is the benefit of “choice”, when the two sole options are pathetically incompetent?
It’s time for a third-way, called Centrist. Which, summed up, means leaving the Capitalist Cash-Cow as it is, but learning how to milk it such that its produce leads to a better distribution for everyone. Communist propaganda, you think?
Not really. The above premise wont happen until Americans learn the facts about their economic predicament, which boils down to this: If you are a member of the middle and lower class of America (meaning that you earn less than $350K per year), then you a part of the 80% of Americans that are sharing 7% of the country’s financial wealth. Yep, all the rest – all 93% of it – goes to the upper-class 20% of the population. (Don’t believe that sad fact of exceptionally warped distribution of America’s Financial Wealth? Then go here.)
Now, knowing that, do explain why anyone should work themselves to exhaustion for the benefit of just 20% of the population that live off their rents? Answer: Because one does not have much choice in a highly competitive America, where the Law of the Jungle prevails far too often.
More foolish, yet, America is one of the very few countries that has such a meager number of vacation days – and yet 17% of the working population give at least 10% of their vacation time back to their employers?
That’s dumber than dumb. So, please, enough of the “Liberty Bell” BS. All that mellifluous pap for the masses is just folklore, long since past.
Our founding fathers would not recognize today the United States they worked so hard to create.
Report thisBy C.Curtis.Dillon, November 3, 2010 at 3:47 am Link to this comment
This was a nice declaration of principles and may even be a declaration of war on the elites. I’m certain in for the long haul on this struggle. We need to start at the local level and build a new way of doing business in this country.
I’ve been pondering the current rightward drift all over the world of late and have concluded that it is really a drift toward the Chinese way of doing government. I know for a fact that several governments here in Eastern Europe are seeking to emulate the Chinese model, with a single political entity closely tied to the wealthy elite of the country. Russia is almost completely there while Ukraine is making a strong move in that direction with the elections on Sunday. I also can see European politicians salivating at the idea of eliminating all this dirty, uncomfortable political wrangling and replacing it with something cleaner and easier (for them). One need not look too far to see the same ideas being pushed in America and elsewhere. And why not ... China is blowing the world apart with their state capitalist model. It’s like the wild west with the sheriff on the crook’s side.
The revolution we need to make is not one of violence although conscious civil disobedience is certainly needed. The rule of law no longer applies when the laws have been distorted and stacked against us. So we need to form small groups, like the nurses did, and then grow the organizations through affiliation and common goals. We need to make governing impossible for the elites, to throw their stupid laws and bones back in their faces. We can refuse to participate and can, eventually, win. Think about your town when most of the people refuse to go along with decisions made by your local mayor or city council. How do you think they will prevail? They can’t. If we say no, they have no choice but to go along with us. That is our revolution ... not deciding between worthless Republicans or worthless Democrats.
Report thisBy lichen, November 3, 2010 at 1:08 am Link to this comment
The republicans/most democrats can be lumped together as corporatist serial killer right wing scum. We need real democracy, which will mean the end of corporate funding, career politicians, the murdochs and coch’s and clintons, and the time when we can really rule instead of the plutocracy.
Report thisBy bodhidharma, November 3, 2010 at 12:23 am Link to this comment
Morpheus, some of the stuff on the Revolution site is true. We could do a lot better if we used our technology to reduce work hours and supplied people fairly with the things they need instead of creating economic crises with it by reducing our workforce and lining the pockets of big business. What he’s talking about would be true democratic socialism. The problem is how you institute such a thing in a country so highly controlled as ours. I’ve been preaching this stuff for decades, but changing people’s minds is harder than finding a tea-bagger with a PH.D.
Report thisBy Morpheus, November 2, 2010 at 11:40 pm Link to this comment
Wake the Hell up America! - Join the Revolution!
Read “Common Sense 3.1” at ( http://www.revolution2.osixs.org )
We don’t have to live like this anymore.
Things are only going to get worse because of you. You refuse to take any action while you wait for Democrats and Republicans to save the day. I have news for you. This is not another financial downturn or downcycle. Democrats, Republicans and economist don’t know squat.
Report thisBy bodhidharma, November 2, 2010 at 10:50 pm Link to this comment
I can relate to the deep feelings of disillusionment with our government that the author certainly felt.It seems that we are constantly going from bad to worse,and taking our government back from the wealthy elite seems to be near impossible as they control the media and suppress our rights to protest as they turn us into another third world country. We watch helplessly as our jobs are shipped overseas, our trade deficits increase and our middle class disappears. Labor unions are becoming a thing of the past as the jobs they protected vanish. In the last few decades we have watched as our government became a hollow shell, most of the functions it used to perform for the public good being privatized to corporations interested only in making as much profit as possible. We are now 47th in life expectancy in this country, and still they try to tell us we are ‘the greatest nation on earth’! I keep trying to figure out how so many of our people can be so gullible. Have we just become intellectually lazy? Has life just become too complicated, have we lost faith in ourselves? I am amazed constantly when I talk to people just how uninformed they seem to be, and just how much misinformation they seem to have absorbed. Maybe when things get bad enough, we will see a change. Maybe then a third party with the average person’s welfare in mind will become viable. I am starting to wonder just how bad things will have to get first, though!
Report thisBy the worm, November 2, 2010 at 8:43 pm Link to this comment
The recent visual vividly illustrating the Obama administration’s failure, shows
Obama in a ‘backyard session’, ‘listening’ to the American people.
If President Obama had been listening for the last two years, he’d have heard
American people wanted change in three areas:
1 The American people wanted a government administered plan like Medicare -
for everyone. (72% - CBS/New York Times poll June 2009)
1A. Democrats gave private sector insurers a windfall: mandated customers, with
a taxpayer-paid overhead rate of 20% for ‘mandated customers’ (20% of our
premium spent on administration, CEO salaries, bonuses, Boards to set rates and
decide who’s covered and ‘profits’).
2 64% of the American people opposed expanding the war in Afghanistan and
wanted to disentangle from Bush-era ‘War on Terror’ and ‘preventive war’
policies.
2B. Democrats gave us an expansion of the war in Afghanistan.
3 The vast majority of Americans opposed the transfer of taxpayer wealth to
cover private company debt – the bailout.
3B. Democrats kept the 6 too-big-to-fail banks – now bigger than ever; kept
deposits at risk by maintaining huge grey areas between commercial and
investment banking; didn’t ‘punish’ the financial industry - now even more
profitable, with bonuses among the biggest ever.
None are so blind as those who will not see, nor deaf as those who will not hear.
Report thisBy lasmog, November 2, 2010 at 7:14 pm Link to this comment
What a choice; two corporatist parties to choose from. There doesn’t seem to be anyway to punish the sleazy Democrats without rewarding the sleazier Republicans. We deserve much better than Clinton or Obama but do deserve President Palin?
Report thisBy mdgr, November 2, 2010 at 6:01 pm Link to this comment
This article reflects all that is good and not so good about the Green Party.
First of all, let it be said that Scott Tucker can write. On the other hand, he is even wordier than Scott Ritter, and unlike the former, after just a little while he begins to lose the forest through the trees.
We’re talking about a serious need for an editor, and this is true for the Green Party in general. I mean, in the state of Washington, the Green’s didn’t even have a Senate candidate, and their site looked like it had been constructed by culturally deprived four year old.
They are strong on idealism, yes, but in matters of execution, they typically get lost in their own patter and become excessively cerebral. While they may be able to play three-dimensional chess in their heads, they typically are unable to put forward succinctly compelling points without inadvertently “screwing the pooch” in the presentation.
And they continue to nominate totally unelectable candidates, while patting themselves on the back and feeling very martyr-like. Still, I generally agree with the thrust of Mr. Ticker’s argument even if the Green’s are unable to maintain much of a state presence, much less a national presence. I certainly won’t be voting for them this election, partly because they don’t have it together enough to have anyone to vote for.
Report thisBy grumps, November 2, 2010 at 5:09 pm Link to this comment
Excellent article and personally I came to the same conclusion for this election. I refused to be fear mongered into voting for the “lesser evil” again.
Report thisI like Nader’s suggestion also: vote your conscience.
By Matzpen, November 2, 2010 at 4:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
That’s the terrible thing about American politics. The two parties already have too much in common but then they add bipartisanship into the mix. Why bother even voting at this point
Report thishttp://sherrytalksback.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/why-im-not-voting/
By Smoove, November 2, 2010 at 4:40 pm Link to this comment
“Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Roots of an Individualist Ideology”
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1665934
Report thisBy ralph, November 2, 2010 at 4:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Mills wrote in detail about the power elite and the masses. Written in 1956 but as fresh and pertinent as then. ” The Power Elite” says it all. Truly remarkable.
Report this