|
|||
|
The Last Days of DemocracyPosted on Aug 2, 2007
(Page 4) Harris: ... [H]ere’s a question, and Josh speaks to this as well. Elliot, you were talking about PNAC, the Project for the New American Century, and you’re also talking about media and how it’s been manipulated severely in the last seven years. We’ve seen the government exposed; we’ve see the government abuse, that power can be misused. Does this reveal a problem perhaps, a more insoluble one that our government is flawed? That the system that we abide by, the Republic, is flawed? And if so, what do we do about that fact? Cohen: I think that after they’ve ransacked the Constitution and the balance of powers and the like as they’ve done, it really is flawed. They’ve set some dangerous precedents. Was the system intact when they came in? I think it was. But any system, any system has vulnerabilities. There’s no system of government and no system of any activity or operation that’s entirely invulnerable. I think we have a good system and if we can only get it back and start recognizing the rule of law in implementing it. I think what’s happening is that they are getting away with so many things. I mean, they refused to recognize subpoenas, they evoke executive privilege even with the Tillman case; I mean, this is absurd. They’ve gone to such absurd lengths of just disregarding the rule of law that anybody, no matter how perfect your system was, if they weren’t going to follow the rules then the system wouldn’t work. So I think what Congress needs to realize is just that. They have to take the powers that they do have, they have some powers that they can exercise, but they’re not doing it. I think this is human error. I think it’s with people who are in power right now and the people are trying to do something about it. There’s where the wimpishness comes in. They’re being ... the Congress is being wimpish. They need to impeach Bush. They can do that. But they’re not. And it’s not the system’s fault; it’s their fault. Harris: And isn’t that a sad fact, though? You see [House Speaker Nancy] Pelosi there; you see Sen. [Harry] Reid there. They all seem to be talking the talk but nobody is actually getting anything done. And I think that’s the most upsetting part, as Dr. Cohen just said. Scheer: Well, I just think that no one is—. As Dr. Cohen said, and previous with people writing letters to Congress, I think that as a citizenry, and I need to do more. I’m sure everyone could do a little more ... to let them know that we’re pissed off. And I think that’s why the election [outcome of 2006] happened. The Democrats should learn from that and, you know, any time you get a system that large obviously things are going to fall through the cracks, but they can certainly, they should be responsible with the election and how much the Democrats have raised more than the Republicans. They should learn that the citizenry is upset. ... Advertisement New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By John Borowski, August 3, 2007 at 11:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Once we had a government with two parties that had a chance to win an election. All other parties had as much chance as a snowball in mythical hell. One was the totally, which was totally for capitalism. The other party was the completely, which was completely for capitalism. If you didnt like the totally you could always pick the completely. The totally didnt like this arrangement, so they eliminated the completely by castrating them. As a result, the completely (The Democratic Party) walked around giving the American people the illusion that we still had a two party system. Unfortunately, with little or no power in Congress even with a majority. The totally could do this because they had an OK from our masters in Britain. The voting booths reflected greater probity when the public saw two levers to pull. In the old days, there were some good totallys (The Republicans). Unfortunately, using fear, intimidation, and black listing they expunged most of these people from the party. Back in the good old days the middle class voted for the totally because the totally attacked the blue collars unions and help for the poor. The middle class felt if the unions were emasculated, the stuff they produce would be cheaper for them to buy. In addition, if the poor didn’t get help, their taxes would be less. After the purge of the decent Republicans the totally was not only after the blue collars butt, they were after the white collars butt too. They have the quality of life and living standard of most Americans in a vise; and are slowly cranking the handle. After 9/11, the right used it to go to war in Iraq. The coming attack will probably kill ten thousand Americans or more. The right will use this horror to declare a dictatorship. Sherlock Holmes always said in a conspiracy look at who profits. It amazes me how many Benedict Arnolds come out of the woodwork when the climate is right.PS I cant understand why the right wing lackeys frequent this web page. If I were a member of their boiler room, I would find right wing fascist web pages more to my liking.
Report thisBy Verne Arnold, August 3, 2007 at 10:47 am Link to this comment
#91962 by Leefeller on 8/03 at 9:03 am
(260 comments total)
Good words, and you haven’t posted a lot lately yourself. Like me, maybe your tired. This work must be picked up and carried by the young or we’re cooked, yes?
Report thisBy Dale Headley, August 3, 2007 at 10:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
There are no two ways about it: the Bush Administration is fascist to the core. Those who deny it don’t really know what fascism is. Look it up, then consider this: “if it quacks like a duck…” Unless we face up to this threat and meet it head-on, we are very likely to become the next Nazi Germany. In fact, most of the world is convinced we are already. They see the secret prisons; the torture; the invasion, occupation, and destruction of an innocent, helpless, country; the terrorizing of women and children with white phosphorous bombs; the incremental destruction of American values, institutions, and constitutional protections; and they ask themselves, “What is different about these things and what Hitler did prior to WWII?” The inescapable answer is, “Nothing!”
Report thisBy GW=MCHammered, August 3, 2007 at 9:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“It’s called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.”
~George Carlin
Report thisWho Owns You?
(the truth in 3 minutes)
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18100.htm
By NewsSophisticate, August 3, 2007 at 9:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
We are in the last days of our Demcrazy. For the last 28 years Yale has been in the Oval Office. What are the probabilities of that? Highly unlikely. As far as the election is looking it appears they are up to it again. Hillary and Joe Biden are both from Yale…Is Biden going to be Hill’s VP?
http://newssophisticate.blogspot.com/2007/07/4th-branch-membership-requirment-yale.html
With the continuation of this war of terror the United States has been supporting through the use of sub ‘machine gun’ contractors. These ‘contractors’ are working for private corporate armies. These are extremely dangerous to Democrazy itself. In fact, currently the Green Zone is guarded by a company named Triple Canopy Inc. Hows that…not British, not American…‘contractors’ guard the highest value target in Iraq. Worse yet, Triple Canopy hires Latin Americans who don’t speak English well…leaving a language barrier at critical stages in our overall security of the Green Zone. Perhaps that is why we have been having problems in the Green Zone.
Here is my article on the Green Zone
http://newssophisticate.blogspot.com/2007/07/whose-guarding-green-zone-privatizing.html
Has Blackwater gone to Darfur? Are they part of the ‘new hybrid force’ of the UN
Report thishttp://newssophisticate.blogspot.com/2007/08/has-blackwater-usa-entered-darfur.html
By Leefeller, August 3, 2007 at 9:03 am Link to this comment
The democratic republic sponsored by our founding fathers, has been diminished and continues to be destroyed by special interests, big money and a mass media, all of whom have one goal in mind, money, power and control.
Constant chipping and hammering by lobbyist’s sponsored by special interest selling personal agendas, have bought and sold most of our representatives in congress and the White House is a given. Congress represents itself to the highest bidder, the people be damned.
The new order, governments without borders or in the works, we have seen this being developed for big business, using the WTO and Nafta. What is happening to the little people without power or wealth, as it has always been, they are cannon fodder for the wars of the elite.
Our founding fathers fought for what they believed in, they put their lives, the lives of their families on the line for what they believed to be a new idea of government. We have regressed back to a lopsided government, the balance of power has diminished, where corporations have more rights than individuals, the robber barrons are back.
Ignorance and apathy is key in our loss of liberty. People are expendable to uncompassionate governments and leaders, it goes on.
Only if we elect real people, people who care about people, people with fresh ideas not status quo, maybe a change could take place. Otherwise we are doomed to continue with the undermining our founding fathers new ideas for government.
Report thisBy 127001, August 3, 2007 at 5:58 am Link to this comment
Yup. However, we are not necessarily in the “last days of Democracy.” It may be already gone, which will show in about the next 10 years. I don’t hold hope. The damage of the current administration, corporate society, and branches of government is pervasive.
Re: #91910 by ardee… “I believe that the vast majority of Americans are well intentioned and decent folks.”
IMHO the current forefront of Americans are complacent and ambivalent, self-serving and ignorant of social issues. This primarily reflects the age groups of the 80’s and 90’s.
Then we have the age groups of the 60’s and 70’s, the ones of the days of activism in this country. Those who did sell out because they became disillusioned and overwhelmed probably won’t want to return to “rocking the boat” and the others that are still trying to hold on to the fight are up against time moving forward.
We have another new generation moving into power. Look at high school and college student ages. They are influenced by technology and the push toward math and science, not philosophy, sociology, or any of the other social educational subjects that move a society forward.
Will we be run by a nation of corporate geeks???
And those young people moving into the voting age won’t know how to take care of themselves, how to think for themselves, and will be more than willing to sacrifice “freedom” for status quo with respect to a safe and comfortable daily life. What concerns me about that is that human life itself becomes minimized to yield to the illusional “good of the whole” (which is really an abstract and illusion). They simply won’t know any better.
How better to defeat any nation or society than to make them unable to think independently, generate their own food and goods, or the many other facets of an independent and self supporting society.
And I can think of several nations right now that have the means and are moving toward the ability to defeat this country ... probably without a shot fired.
Let’s wait and see.
Report thisBy cyrena, August 3, 2007 at 5:01 am Link to this comment
#91870 by B Keith on 8/02 at 10:13 pm
B Keith,
This is obviously a rush transcript, and people don’t generally speak in interviews, as they would in an essay or other scholastic analysis.
So, you may have been able to understand it better if you’d listened and read, or even just listened.
Just a thought.
Report thisBy ardee, August 3, 2007 at 4:54 am Link to this comment
I have been active ,politically, for over forty years, since becoming politicized in Viet Nam. During that time my smallish group has engaged in many political actions, the most successful of which were always locally focussed. We found, through trial and error, that building bridges to the community through such devices as assisting in the building and maintenance of child care centers, senior centers, enrolling the elderly in programs, and voter registration drives was the way to gain support for our programs.
I prefaced my following remarks to give background to my views. I believe that Democracy is far stronger than many others seem to feel. I believe that the vast majority of Americans are well intentioned and decent folks. I also believe that politics is secondary in their lives, unlike so many here. The failures of our system can be laid solely at the door of the influence of money in politics.
The Democratic Party , in using the DLC as a hound dog actively seeking corporate campaign fundings from precisely those who have stolen our processes, has abrogated its responsibility and negated its track record.
The reason so many despair is precisely because Democrats focus on boardrooms and not classrooms and communities. I have little doubt that this will change, albeit rather slowly. It may not be the Demcorats who lead us from this wilderness but we will find the end eventually.
Report thisBy Outraged, August 3, 2007 at 2:59 am Link to this comment
I’m in total agreement cyrena. Really makes you wonder just what Murdoch has got up his sleeve. We have to retain control of the internet. Right now the internet IS democracy and our most reasonable source for truth and inquiry. And boy do they want it.
Report thisBy cyrena, August 3, 2007 at 1:19 am Link to this comment
Excellent. Excellent. This is what we need to know. Or, there are still many of us that need to know this stuff, specfically about what WE can do, as ordinary citizens.
Report thisBy B Keith, August 2, 2007 at 10:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Would you PLEASE speak English! This reads like gibberish!
Report thisPage 2 of 2 pages < 1 2