Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
Top Banner, Site wide
Apr 17, 2014

 Choose a size
Text Size

Top Leaderboard, Site wide

Star-Spangled Baggage
Science Finds New Routes to Energy




Paul Robeson: A Life


Truthdig Bazaar
Hitch-22: A Memoir

Hitch-22: A Memoir

By Christopher Hitchens
$16.19

more items

 
Report

Truthdigger of the Week: Robert Reich

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Nov 11, 2011
Wikimedia Commons / Mike Edrington (CC-BY-SA)

(Page 3)

Yes, sir … the question is, what could we do with all the dollars that we are spending now on the military? $700 billion a year. Well, if we had $700 billion a year, or even if we halve the military budget to $350 billion a year, we could educate all of our children, provide early childhood education; we could provide health care to all of our people; we could have a first-class infrastructure in this country; and we could provide jobs to people rebuilding America. [applause]

Yes … [question: the proposed constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United, can you address that, please?] … You know, the problem we’re talking about is not only a problem of Congress and Washington; or at least, it’s not only a problem of elected officials directly. It’s also a problem—and let’s be candid about this—it’s a problem of our Supreme Court. [applause] And I’m going to name names. They start with Roberts, and Scalia and Alito, and Clarence Thomas, and too often, Justice Kennedy. And what they have decided—among other things that are heinous, that are ridiculous, that are grotesque—they’ve decided, under the First Amendment, that money is speech and corporations are people. [booing from crowd] I will believe that corporations are people when Georgia and Texas start executing corporations. [applause] Now, look: In order to get a majority of the Supreme Court back for America, reflecting the values of America—and most Americans don’t believe corporations are people. In fact, the Supreme Court, in the way it’s viewing the First Amendment, is basically saying to the rest of us, ‘You don’t have freedom of speech.’ Because we cannot get our message through with all of the money coming from big corporations and from rich people. Now, listen: There is one justice, one justice standing between us and having a majority on the Supreme Court. And we’ve got to make sure that whoever is the next Supreme Court justice pledges to overrule Citizens United against the Federal Election Commission. [applause]

You know, just as a sign of how far you have led this country—can I just say, just an example of how far you’ve led this country—I go around this country, I talk about Citizens United, and people all over this country are apoplectic; they are enraged. I talk about Glass-Steagall and everybody applauds. Six months ago, do you think people would have applauded for Glass-Steagall? [laughter] Do you see the education, the understanding that is being created in this country? Here’s something else. People on the other side say, ‘Oh, corporations—corporations need more money in order to hire people; their taxes have to be reduced; they have to have less regulations.’ Well, the reality is, American corporations are now sitting on $2 trillion of cash they don’t even know what to do with, and the ratio of corporate profits to wages is higher than it’s been since before the Great Depression. Corporations [aren’t] hiring, not because they don’t have the money; they have plenty of money, they’re awash in money. They don’t need tax breaks; they don’t need regulatory so-called relief, which actually means fewer regulations, health, safety, the environment, Wall Street—no. What they need are customers; they need demand, and that means they need people who have money in their pockets, average working people and poor people.

Time for one more question. … How do we rebuild the safety net? Right now, at a time in American history when we have the worst economy since the Great Depression, our social safety nets are in tatters. Only 40 percent of people who are unemployed qualify for unemployment insurance. Only 40 percent. And it’s not even clear, after the end of this year, that unemployment insurance is going to be extended for all of the people who desperately need it. Single mothers—what are we doing for single mothers who need to work? Well, we don’t even have work out there, let alone any safety net for them, any longer. What about young people with loans, college loans hanging around their necks? Unemployment among young people, even with college degrees, is about 9 percent right now. And they have an average of $25,000 that they owe. And what about a safety net for people who have huge mortgage debt, that are underwater? We bailed out the banks, folks; why don’t we bail out average working people, average people, with regard to huge debts they have? [applause]

Advertisement

Square, Site wide
In closing, let me just say this. Everything is going to … [pause, laughter]… it’s going to work out. This country, if you look at American history, every time it looks like … [yelling from crowd]… wait a minute. Before we get to revolution, let me just say something. [laughter] Every time, in the history of this country, when things have got totally out of whack—and I’m talking about the 1880s and 1890s, and 1920s and 1950s—every time in this country when things have got out of whack, you know what happens? People rise up. The people rise! Americans can do it. And we can do it if we are patient, if we are nonviolent, if we understand the importance of people organized and mobilized, and if we educate those who disagree with us, and listen to those who disagree with us. Thank you very much.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By heterochromatic, November 16, 2011 at 10:52 am Link to this comment

a perfect society ain’t the likely outcome of an aggregation of quite imperfect
individuals

Report this

By truedigger3, November 16, 2011 at 1:55 am Link to this comment

Re: By gerard, November 15 at 5:02 pm

gerard wrote:

“Have you ever considered that one reason why the “current (low) level of evolution of homosappiens” might be due to the fact that they need to be encouraged more often to step up to the plate, take a crack at the ball, and then run to the next “stage” of evolution?  Otherwise, I don’t see how they are to get there. “
——————————————————————————-
gerard,
They will get there, if they survive that long, the same way some apes evolved to become the current homosapiens.
I am not against education, reforms or striving for something better, however, we have to be mindful of the human nature and construct something that is very idealistic and against human nature. History is very good proof of that.

Report this

By truedigger3, November 16, 2011 at 1:50 am Link to this comment

Re: By gerard, November 15 at 5:02 pm

gerard wrote:

“Have you ever considered that one reason why the “current (low) level of evolution of homosappiens” might be due to the fact that they need to be encouraged more often to step up to the plate, take a crack at the ball, and then run to the next “stage” of evolution?  Otherwise, I don’t see how they are to get there. “
——————————————————————————-
gerard,
They will get there, if they survive that long, the same way some apes evolved to become the current homosapiens.
I am not against education, reforms or striving for something better, however, we have to be mindful of the human nature and construct something that human nature will not

Report this

By gerard, November 15, 2011 at 5:02 pm Link to this comment

Truedigger 6:20—“What I meant is that working with the current level of evolution of homosapiens and not base solutions on better evolved homosapiens who are still far away in the future.”

Have you ever considered that one reason why the “current (low) level of evolution of homosappiens” might be due to the fact that they need to be encouraged more often to step up to the plate, take a crack at the ball, and then run to the next “stage” of evolution?  Otherwise, I don’t see how they are to get there.

Report this

By terry p, November 14, 2011 at 6:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have high regards for Robert Reich and, as I said earlier,  really like him. But, he speaks from within our corrupt system and, even though he has the tone of the movement his goal is calming the beast within the occupations and getting in front of it. Calming the beast is a good thing but what we need is more truth from those who are experiencing the wrath of the power of our true enemy.

This > http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/49439 < is a link to comments made by Christine Assange. She is on the receiving end of that wrath. Her son, who is probably the most significant contributor to the truth of which the 99%ers are upset, and is now in grave danger of that wrath.

The powerful banksters control the wrath. They are like vampires. They don’t like the light of truth, so stay hide under their mountains of money created fraudulently behind the walls of Wall Street. 

Mr Reich is right about the nature of this movement. It is similar to what some of our founders experienced. But the same shyster crook types want to take over the movement and guide it back into the prisons of austerity. They want to shackle as many 99%ers with debt as possible while they bend all the rules to fit their agenda.

What Mr Reich left out is the most significant and the obvious answers we all look for. That is that the people of this country don’t own their own banking system. The Federal Reserve Banks(Feds) were stolen through an act of congress almost a century ago. Our future is in the hands of the Feds. The American dream is hiding inside and only the .01%ers have it in their possession.

Find out about the Feds(a private counterfeiting corporation consisting of 12 banks) and how we all became their debt slaves in 1913. After signing the bill into law President Woodrow Wilson later mourned that he gave our country away.

Follow the yellow brick road to the banksters emerald city. Read “The Web of Debt” by Ellen Brown. link > http://webofdebt.wordpress.com/.

tp:?)

Report this

By do over, November 13, 2011 at 11:19 pm Link to this comment

We don’t need no stinkin’ economists !

Report this

By truedigger3, November 13, 2011 at 9:37 pm Link to this comment

Re: By gerard, November 13 at 6:20 pm

gerard,

What I meant is that working with the current level of evolution of homosapiens and not base solutions on better evolved homosapiens who are still far away in the future.! That does not mean and I did not call for working with any group or any organization specifically!.

Report this

By heterochromatic, November 13, 2011 at 8:47 pm Link to this comment

a far deeper problem is to worry about how we can profit by positing changing the
nature of human beings as a reasonable way forward.

Report this

By John Poole, November 13, 2011 at 8:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Reich carrying a pitchfork? He’s too well off financially to even own one. That also
applies to someone like John Stewart who makes a living poking (with a very dull
pitchfork) the ruling elite by exposing their laughable foibles.  Both Reich and
Stewart work for the king. They have jumped the moat. Fools would consider them
on the side of those who are on the other side of the drawbridge.

Report this

By gerard, November 13, 2011 at 6:20 pm Link to this comment

trutdigger3:  “,,, require different more evolved homosapiens and that will not happen for a long time, so let us work with current homosapiens and try educate them and smooth their rough edges.” (preslumably to help them forego their greedy impulses). Then just a bit later you say there is no time for (this and that) and let us “work with” what we have. 

  I would like to know your specific proposals for “working with” Wall Street, whose main interest in life is “working against” the 99%, for that is precisely our problem.

Report this

By castorp, November 13, 2011 at 4:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“Yes, ma’am … here’s the question: In my opinion, will Obama ever fulfill the promises he made to us in 2008? The answer is this: President Obama, if he is faced with a strong and articulate and powerful progressive movement, President Obama will go along.”

Clearly, either Reich has drunk the Kook-Aid, or he wants the rest of us to drink it.

Report this

By truedigger3, November 13, 2011 at 4:29 pm Link to this comment

Re:By sistertongue, November 13 at 10:23 am
(Unregistered commenter)

sistertongue wrote:
“I think we need to look at the fact that a much deeper core problem with humanity is its reverence for profit. ....”
—————————————————————————
sistertongue,
There is nothing wrong with profits as long it is reasonable and were obtained honestly with all due respect and considerations for the employees, environment and society as a whole.
Part of the proftits, through taxation, should help finance an egalitarian society with adequate safety net.
The privately owned Federal Reserve bank, oil, gas, coal, electricity generation and and distribution logging in natural forests should be owned by the Federal government
What you are alluding to will require different more evolved homosapiens and that will not happen for a long time, so let us work with current homosapiens and try educate them and smooth their rough edges.
There is no time at hand for grand theoritical ideas,  philosophies and pies in the sky.
The United States is immensely rich, so I am puzzled that you are dumbfounded when some one says that??!!
Please do some reading about the US economy and its natural, technical and scientific and human resources!.

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, November 13, 2011 at 4:00 pm Link to this comment

Re: sistertongue

Your comment: “And, uh, I am dumbfounded that Mr.
Reich would actually say America is very
rich.  It is not.”

Really…. you’re “dumbfounded” ...huh…..ahem….mmmm…
Wow, that would be news to the rest of the world, would it not..? And us too..! LOL.

“Dumbfounded”, you said. So what are you saying….that we’re a poor country….? Or what….? Wow…..I’m dumbfounded as to what to say to an assertion that is completely true and well documented, easily fact checked and common knowledge…... yet, someone is “dumbfounded” by it.

http://www.aneki.com/richest.html

Report this

By Foucauldian, November 13, 2011 at 3:09 pm Link to this comment

sistertongue, November 13 at 10:23 am

You got it exactly right, both in spirit and in detail. 
In fact, Reich contradicted himself more than once on
this score.

Report this

By Foucauldian, November 13, 2011 at 3:04 pm Link to this comment

“Financial capitalism has taken over from real
capitalism.”      Robert Reich

So now capitalism is a good thing, so say the editors
of Truthdig.

It’s rather ironic that they seem to support OWS. 
And it’s myopic, too, to suppose that OWS is only
against the bankers.

But since the editors of Truthdig say so, it must be
true.

Report this

By terry p, November 13, 2011 at 1:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

By prisnersdilema, November 13 at 12:09 am

“...try a speech that starts like this…

“Our government is in the hands of a group of wealthy but criminally insane sociopaths,
who will stop at nothing, in their drive to destroy this country and turn it into a totalitarian
Empire…they will lie cheat, steal and murder anyone who gets in there way, hiding the
details from the public, by using bribery and violent coercion to prevent the people from
regaining control of their government…”

————————————-

My sentiments exactly ...but, I don’t think Mr Reich would then be able to attain any position in the empire, of which he is a high level part, that would enable him to pass down what little help he might manage to grapple if your statement was his thesis and an example of his diplomacy:?)

I think his speech was good cheer leading for the Democratic party but far from a realistic change maker. He made a few very good points but left out the real target. That’s what to do about the ‘private’ 12 Federal Reserve Banks. We should be the owners but we are the slaves as of 1913’s Federal Reserve Act.

tp:?)

PS:read “Web of Debt” by Ellen Brown

Report this

By terry p, November 13, 2011 at 12:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’ve always liked Robert Reich. But I think he might be getting out in front of the movement to calm the beast within for the system. And we know who is in charge of the system. It’s Wall-Street & the banksters.

He’s also promoting the Democratic Party which has failed us by joining the Republican Party in compromise. The Democratic party has been bought and paid for. He did mention that but seems to think we can trust it to make adjustments. I don’t think so. Fool me once shame on you. I lost count of the betrayals of this administration. Shame on us if we buy into that sales pitch again.

Not once did he mention The Federal Reserve, which is exactly where the problem is. It keeps bailing out the banks instead of the 99%ers.

Not one time did he mention Public Banking or nationalizing banks too big to fail. He did touch on regulation and accountability. That carrys a little weight. But again who do we trust to do that?

He didn’t remind the people of the Federal Reserve Act when our banking system was hijacked in 1913.

Although, he did raise single payer health insurance. That was significant. But, he wants to trust the Democrats to fix that? We already went down that road and got Obamacare.

And, he did mention a couple of those too big to jailsters - the Koch brothers.

I wished someone had asked him what the benefits of a Public Banking system would be. It makes me think the questioners were picked. The # 1 demand by OWS is to nationalize the Federal Reserve.

It was a good speech. It could have been better.

tp

PS: Read “Web of Debt” by Ellen Brown.

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, November 13, 2011 at 12:26 pm Link to this comment

Re: ITW

Your comment: “Thanks for fighting the good fight
against ignorance and dogma, whether from the right
or the left.”

Did you notice how some of those on “the left” are
the Bachmann type of “leftie” (and the nastiness is
unmistakable).

Michelle Bachmann:
”“If you look at China, they don’t have food
stamps,” she said. “They don’t have the modern
welfare state, and China’s growing,” she exclaimed,
adding: “And so what I would do is look at the
programs that LBJ gave us with the Great Society and
they’d be gone.”

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2011/11/does_michele_bachmann_want_the_u_s_to_be_more_like_china_.html

Apparently Bachmann wants to be like Communist
China….........LOL!

Report this

By sistertongue, November 13, 2011 at 10:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think we need to look at the fact that a much deeper core problem with
humanity is its reverence for profit.  It is, in fact, quite a pathetic reason to give
for living.  I highly recommend a book by a man named Lewis Hyde, called “The
Gift.”  He is an academic from Harvard and the book discusses at length and
through many different perspectives, what happens to the sacred when we
choose to commodify all aspects of our lives. 

This is a more meta - level approach to an analysis and critique of the utter
debauchery of this country (which, is, of course, based upon the equally
debauched philosophies and practices of the Romans and Greeks).  I think it is
the only discussion we should be having, as the continued juvenile games of
throwing sticks and stones at the rich, or cheering for the reds or the blues like
we are still in Junior High School, is NOT going to change, nor even reveal, the
true reasons we are in this mess.

And, uh, I am dumbfounded that Mr. Reich would actually say America is very
rich.  It is not.  We are the biggest debtors on the planet and all those dollar
bills they are pumping out of the treasury are worthless.  Something is very,
very wrong with that man’s “facts.”

Report this
mrfreeze's avatar

By mrfreeze, November 13, 2011 at 9:54 am Link to this comment

prisnersdilema - I think you’re absolutely right about the “he/we don’t have any political power.” In spite of this, I’d much rather people listen to Robert Reich’s perspective than that of the Nordquists, Limbaughs, Roves, etc..

I also must say, in today’s bought-and-paid-for news Media, Mr. Reich (or any other honest thinker) would never be able to use your “beginning paragraph.” It simply states the truth, something the powerful don’t want the populace to hear.

Report this
Alan Lunn's avatar

By Alan Lunn, November 13, 2011 at 7:15 am Link to this comment

The core problem has to be identified; and it is
beyond ideology, or should be: The reason we have no
voice—no representation—is that the voice of
the “corporate person” is louder in Washington. We
have a bought government and the people we send there
are slaves of the bribery system.

This means that there has to be an amendment to the
Constitution that effectively and finally stops the
auction of politicians. Every politician has to raise
$1500/day, minimum, to remain on the Hill. They spend
more time raising money than they do on legislation
or listening to people. We need a completely public
system of raising campaign dollars.

The GOP deception is that the people are not up to
governing. It’s an old and even ancient theory. That
means that government always belongs to the rich who
can buy it. You will never have a true voice of the
people until you own your own government. This means
there has to be massive pressure from beneath. We
can’t do that unless Americans across the political
spectrum unite on the issue of money in government.

Obama, in 2009, told 13 of the nation’s biggest
banksters, “My administration is the only thing
between you and the pitchforks.”

We are those pitchforks and it’s time to start
poking. And thank you, Robert Reich, for always
carrying a pitchfork.

Report this
prisnersdilema's avatar

By prisnersdilema, November 13, 2011 at 12:09 am Link to this comment

It doesn’t matter what he says because he doesn’t have any political power…

Do you really think that the one per centers are going to do anything? They own us, and
they can dispose of their property anyway the see fit.

Speeches are fun, but they offer little more than a circle jerk for anger….Reich is living in
the past, when there was a political system that responded, to somewhat normal political
times…But what we have now is far, far from that…it just doesn’t work anymore….

So what’s it going to take before you realize were on then way to the oven….Forty, fifty
percent unemployment?

Each day the economic news more closely resembles Zeno’s pararadox…we make up
half of our losses from the previous day but never seem to get there all the way?

And why is this Mr Reich? It’s time to switch from poetic sounding adjectives, to
unmodified verbs.

Instead try a speech that starts like this…

Our government is in the hands of a group of wealthy but criminally insane sociopaths,
who will stop at nothing, in their drive to destroy this country and turn it into a totalitarian
Empire…they will lie cheat, steal and murder anyone who gets in there way, hiding the
details from fhe public, by using bribery and violent coercion to prevent the people from
regaining control of their government…

Are you up for it Mr. Reich?

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, November 12, 2011 at 9:48 pm Link to this comment

Outraged, MrFreeze, and Leefeller.  Thanks for fighting the good fight against ignorance and dogma, whether from the right or the left. I have always admired Reich.

Report this

By John Poole, November 12, 2011 at 8:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I agree with David J. Cyr. A guy like Reich is slick but inauthentic. Another double
agent working mainly for himself.  Unfortunately, Reich’s type is very prevalent-
someone who can feign genuine compassion for the exploited.

Report this

By gerard, November 12, 2011 at 3:28 pm Link to this comment

It hadn’t occurred to me that “purity” had anything to do with the subject at hand.

Report this

By heterochromatic, November 12, 2011 at 2:45 pm Link to this comment

——My uneasiness with Scheer and Reich as “teachers” giving a “teach-in” at
Occupy LA is based on their (and my) “history.”  That sad history of our failure to
prevent the murderous inequality and injustice everywhere evident today is
adequate proof of our acquiescence to its domination. I therefore surmise that we
have little to nothing to “teach” the Occupiers. ——-


nothing can be learned from the insufficiently pure, no matter how much
knowledge they possess.

it’s a brave new world out there…...

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, November 12, 2011 at 2:23 pm Link to this comment

Teaching does not need be indoctrinations, there may be a handicap in using the word teach in the typical sense, but learning can can come from being taught as well as other ways. Solving problems can come from learning things, one way of learning could be by teaching.  Of course there are other ways to learn things, learning from experience is always a good one, well only for those capable of learning.

Teaching can be a sharing of knowledge and ideas, and used to solve problems,  but again only for people inclined to learn.

Report this

By gerard, November 12, 2011 at 1:55 pm Link to this comment

My uneasiness with Scheer and Reich as “teachers” giving a “teach-in” at Occupy LA is based on their (and my) “history.”  That sad history of our failure to prevent the murderous inequality and injustice everywhere evident today is adequate proof of our acquiescence to its domination. I therefore surmise that we have little to nothing to “teach” the Occupiers. 
  We should support them in trying to find new answers to the problems we failed to solve.  We should provide for their safety. We should try to understand “where they are coming from”—which is not the same as previous history dictated.  We should, therefore, listen and learn from their struggle to create new structures, and help them bring their conclusions to life, help them make enormous changes as carefully and peacefully as possible. 
  I consider it gross conceit to imagine that our “lectures” help them much. Sad, but probably true. I post this as a partial answer to MrFreeze’s question ... “who exactly do you think should take up the shield and sword etc.?”  Support, yes. Guidance, no—unless we have some creative laser beams to shine toward the future. The past is effectively killing everybody on earth!

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, November 12, 2011 at 11:34 am Link to this comment

Robert Scheer is spot on, quote:
” “I think we just witnessed a historic moment ...
a Jeffersonian moment. It was what, really, the
Founders—for all of their imperfections, and I’m
aware of them—had in mind when they thought of this
whole idea of a constitutional democracy based on the
individual.”

Thank you Robert Reich, an excellent speech. More and
more, not less and less the people are mobilizing.
They are from all walks of life.

“In New York on Wednesday, police circled the
veterans as they stood in formation in front of the
New York Stock Exchange, chanting, “We are veterans!
We are the 99 percent!” and “Corporate profits on the
rise, soldiers have to bleed and die!”

By the stock exchange, Josh Shepherd, a former Navy
petty officer 2nd class who was next to Olsen when he
was injured, read the oath members of the armed
forces take to defend the U.S. Constitution.

“We are here to support the Occupy Wall Street
movement,” he then declared.”

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/11/03/thousands-of-veterans-join-occupy-wall-street

Of course there are those who feel that veterans shouldn’t be honored in any way. Like Sen. DeMint:

“The Senate, which has blocked Obama’s jobs plan as a whole and in several pieces, voted 94-1 to approve the veterans provision. Only Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) opposed the bill, saying the government should not “privilege one American over another when it comes to work.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/68199.html#ixzz1dW7J0P3I

What a scumbag, sadly scum like DeMint have other traitorous alliances.  They’re traitors outrightly. They ABSOLUTELY do not defend the Constitution of the US, they have their heads so far up someone’s ass they can’t see straight.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, November 12, 2011 at 11:13 am Link to this comment

The simple fact I have never found any person whom I agree with 100 percent, except myself, which seems to elude others when they show their closed minded ignorance about themselves.  Seems many people love to throw out the baby with the bah water!

I have not read Reich’s books, but I have heard him speak and he appears to speak for the common good, the populous which I feel apart of.  The fact I may not agree with all of everything he may happen to say, is not a problem for me because I believe absolutist agreement is not potentiality possible. 

Good choice for TDer of the week, I expect to see Elizabeth Warren here in the future, another person I may not be a 100 percent in agreement on about everything.

After reading some of the posters comments below, some of whom I do not agree with for their usual short sighted and myopic vision of the world as Truth turns a blind eye or sensibility turns into nonsense.  I find the petty reasons for ragging on this weeks Digger of the week absolutely nothing new!

Report this

By heterochromatic, November 12, 2011 at 9:16 am Link to this comment

truedigger, thank you for your opinion.  I’m enclosing some flowers so you may
stay sweet.

http://pigroll.com/img/hide_and_seek_world_champion.jpg

Report this
mrfreeze's avatar

By mrfreeze, November 12, 2011 at 9:07 am Link to this comment

Since many of you on this thread have a “thing” about Reich (that thing being you criticize without having read his works or listened to his seminars).....who exactly do you think should take up the shield and sword for all of your “causes?” I’m sincerely curious…...where’s the beef?

Report this
IMax's avatar

By IMax, November 12, 2011 at 8:31 am Link to this comment

It would be tremendously useful if Mr. Reich and Mr. Scheer would speak out against the rampant violence and open destruction we’ve been seeing emanating from the ‘Occupy’ crowds.

The means are not justified by the end. Not speaking out amounts to tacit approval.

Report this

By do over, November 12, 2011 at 8:24 am Link to this comment

heterochromatic wrote: “do over-you’re speaking from the 19th century. “

It shames Reich to be valued below his own estimate of his worth, yet, that is where he unknowingly sits as he pontificates about how to keep the past alive.

Report this

By the worm, November 12, 2011 at 7:47 am Link to this comment

Dr Reich has been shafted by two Democratic Presidents - first, his long-time
friend Bill Clinton, then, Barak Obama who he consulted with prior to election and
who then shunned him in favor of Wall Street.

Dr Reich’s values and insights certainly ‘justify’ his nomination as ‘Truth Digger’ of
the week.

But, in light of Dr Reich’s experiences with Clinton and Reich,

Dr Reich’s rejection by both Clinton and Obama and Clinton and Obama’s
subsequent embrace of Wall Street and the wealthy belie Dr Reich’s statement
about the “whole idea of a constitutional democracy based on the individual”.

Unless, of course, you believe as the Supreme Court and Mitt Romney propose:
“Corporations are persons”.

Report this

By the worm, November 12, 2011 at 7:35 am Link to this comment

Dr Reich has hinted at the electoral “problem” facing all of us - Dr Reich predicts a
“passionless election”.

The ‘race’ will be passionless, because the two parties will have ‘nominated’ two
people who represent no one and who no one wants to be represented by.

The two party system was long ago recognized to be a ‘locked job’ - by the
corporate structure and existing power base.

What did the two parties do to “protect” the two party system ?

The two parties cooperated in passing legislation in most States that makes it very
very difficult to establish a viable third party. Because such legislation was in both
their interests, it was easily done; and, it was easily done, too, because it served
the needs of the powerful and the corporations, who owned both parties, but who
might not own a third party.

So, now, we all suddenly recognize the need for a third party, but are faced with a
fait accompli - the great State-by-State legislative barriers to establishing a third
party.

Yes, legal barriers to a third party.

“It’s the law.” So, a two party system is going to be sold as a question of “Law &
Order”.

A core value of any Democracy is respect for “Law & Order’.

It is at he heart of the national decline we’ve been witnessing.

Unfortunately, more and more (now, probably most) Americans realize the law has
been rigged by those who make it.

And those who make the law have turned the laws against the middle class and for
the wealthy and the rich – yes, effectively re-distributing wealth, but also
diminishing respect for the “Law and Order” and the very government that is
supposed to represent us.

Report this

By Argy F, November 12, 2011 at 7:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have always liked Robert Reich in the way I like Paul Krugman & Elizabeth Warren.

Reich isn’t at the level of Chris Hedges or Noam Chomsky or Naomi Klein - but
hey - everyone can’t be SPECTACULAR and giving Kudos to the GOOD is a right
and proper thing, imo.

Report this

By Pete, November 12, 2011 at 6:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Thank you Robert Reich.

Report this

By truedigger3, November 12, 2011 at 6:45 am Link to this comment

Re:By mrfreeze, November 11 at 11:13 pm

mrfreeze wrote addressing me and “do over”:
“truedigger3, do over, you’re both talking out your a**es about Reich. Do a little homework and review your economic history…..”
————————————————————-
mrfreeze,

Since you are mentioning history, then history is very clear about Robert Reich. He is a bullshitter and all talking no walking and as a matter of fact, many times, walking in the opposite direction,  just like the rest of them, aka Bill Clinton and Obama etc…..
I guess you had to much koolaid and it is affecting you brain and judgement.

Report this
David J. Cyr's avatar

By David J. Cyr, November 12, 2011 at 6:07 am Link to this comment

Reich has the same soft-sell seduction job in the corporate party that Kucinich has. Devious dissembling Democrats, who keep hope alive for those who — though lacking any evidence — still faith-based believe they can transform the corporate party from within… to get all good things from (D) evils done.

Well intentioned people do not change the corporate party. The corporate party changes the intentions of the well intentioned who enter it… turning their good intentions into stalwart activist service to the corporate-state.

The corporate party’s progressives have been murdering movements since the days of the Populists’ non-corporate People’s Party (over 120 years). The corporate party’s Democrat machine has a perfect record of accomplishments. Whenever Democrats infest a movement the movement ends up incorporated into the corporate-state’s population control.

If Democrats had done good when they could have there’d be no Occupy Movement now. Democrats didn’t do the good they could have when they could have because they had no intention to. If they didn’t have their scary hairy knuckle dragging Republican partners performing within the corporate party’s theater, the Democrat’s “progressive” performers wouldn’t be able to fool half the sheeple all the time.

The progressive liberals could possibly become good people, if they weren’t Democrats. Democrats are dedicated to herding populist (people’s) grassroots movements into the corporate party’s slaughter house pen.

Voter Consent Wastes Dissent:

http://chenangogreens.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=498&Itemid=1

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, November 12, 2011 at 12:03 am Link to this comment

I saw this guy on one the the early episodes of “Need To Know” (Moyers is coming back, yeahhh!!)

He was trying to give young people good advice about dealing with the jobs market (if I remember correctly). It was pretty much the same old stuff they were pumping out during the Clinton years about being adaptable and such. He didn’t really formulate any strong criticisms of anything particularly the lack of manufacturing jobs or seem to acknowledge that not everyone is going to be suited for high tech highly specialized type careers.

I formulated a pretty negatative opinion of Mr. Reich based on this. I had not paid particularly close attention to Washington during the Clinton years, so I was unfamiliar with his role (or lack of one) in formulating policy.

Since I watched that program, I have noticed that he wrote a book and was voicing some criticisms/suggestions that were more to my liking.

I liked very much what he had to say at occupy L.A.

It wasn’t quite infused with the bitter rage that I so love (and I believe is both necessary and appropriate), but that’s OK I suppose since Mr. Scheer gave a good dose immediately afterwards.

P.S. I am not saying that I think Mr. Reich needs to change his tone.

P.P.S. Congratulations Mr. Reich!!!

Report this
mrfreeze's avatar

By mrfreeze, November 11, 2011 at 11:13 pm Link to this comment

truedigger3, do over, you’re both talking out your a**es about Reich. Do a little homework and review your economic history….........and please do tell us all who you think are the “great” economic/public policy thinkers of this “age of American exceptionalism.”

Report this

By heterochromatic, November 11, 2011 at 11:05 pm Link to this comment

do over-you’re speaking from the 19th century.

Report this

By heterochromatic, November 11, 2011 at 10:30 pm Link to this comment

remember everybody we don’t know but think we don’t like is unethical except
when we learn something that surprises us.

Report this

By do over, November 11, 2011 at 10:28 pm Link to this comment

Reich is stuck in the 20th Century.  He is speaking nonsense when he says, “It is not class warfare. What it is is a recognition that the system has gotten out of balance.”

Reich still believes that the current system is salvageable, Occupiers believe the current system is too corrupt to save, that it must be transcended, and a new system established for life in the 21st Century. Reich is outdated.

Report this

By Michael Cavlan RN, November 11, 2011 at 10:23 pm Link to this comment

Robert Reich will support hopey changey for president. With calls of “feeling disappointed” but….... bullshit line. Mark my words.

He knows it, I know it, you all know it. You just hate having the truth put in front of you all.

He is a Democratic Party operative. You do not get to that place without being OKed by those corporate powers that own the Democrats.

Now there is some truthdigging that will never earn a Truthdigger Of The Week Award.

Report this
mackTN's avatar

By mackTN, November 11, 2011 at 7:49 pm Link to this comment

Agree with enthusiasm.  And I appreciate Robert Reich speaking out on behalf of
the 99% and for sharing his wisdom with us.

Report this

By Glendon Wayne, November 11, 2011 at 7:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Flail The Banana       empirePie           November 11th, 2011

We lament poor ‘others’ as they decline to banana status
not wishing to confront the Euro sleaze that brought them to their knees
We bought with the tune of the FOX - y sleaze,
the sneeze of economies on their knees

Is this the empire? .... kneed by the right bend
printing the popular lucre that we love
trusted and loved world wide?
from “ski in the desert Dubai’
to Mongolian Mountains
where piles of our cash are coming in faster
than any Trump could stash

We lament their decline to banana status
not wishing to confront our quantitive easing bubbles
the bubbles of play at play
as fast cash algorithms feed on the play of the market
and bankers continue to brea
so Middle America and all the awakening 99% can be left adrift

Say do you think we’ve been sold short shrift?

Report this

By Rixar13, November 11, 2011 at 7:39 pm Link to this comment

But despite being entrenched within the system for the majority of his career, Robert Reich uses his powers for good, and that’s why he’s our Truthdigger of the Week.

Thumbs up ^ Robert Reich…

Report this

By heterochromatic, November 11, 2011 at 7:35 pm Link to this comment

——“But despite being entrenched within the system for the majority of his career,
Robert Reich uses his powers for good, and that’s why he’s our Truthdigger of the
Week.”——


and if he says or does something we don’t like, he’ll be a class enemy again, and
we’ll say we knew it.

we’ll always have been at war with Reich.

Report this

By litlpeep, November 11, 2011 at 7:29 pm Link to this comment

It most certainly is class warfare; it has been since 1971.  Plenty of scholars and now even a few reporters have shown that history in compelling fashion.  The filthy wealthy class has waged war on the US for all these four decades, with the increasing help of Washington, D. C., clerics of power, who arrange, with the filthiest of the wealth, to facilitate that war in “reputable, legislative, judicial, and administrative politesse.”

It is time to counter attack.  The Occupy movement is the human wave at the forefront of this counter attack.

It is time now to mobilize the broad former middle class to organize the institutional transformations for sustaining this counter attack, and for transforming the attack into the institutions of equity, integrity, and decency, that our silly Washington, D. C. clerics and the sugar daddies on Wall Street have desecrated without fail.

Whose side is next to yours?  To what wheel is your shoulder?  How shall we celebrate the small victories that lead to the larger Beloved America that Martin Luther King, Jr., envisioned.  Or, perhaps better, our own envisioned better neighborhoods?

Report this

By truedigger3, November 11, 2011 at 6:01 pm Link to this comment

Robert Reich is bullshit artist. He was the labor secretary for Bill Clinton and he and his boss were the prime sellers and movers of NAFTA and globalization that resulted in the loss of millions of US jobs and moving them off shore or to Mexico.
Bill Clinton opposed NAFTA during the election, but the minute he got elected, he reversed his position completely just like Obama after he got elected!!.
When Bill Clinton repealed Glass-Stegall law that seperated commercial banking from investing banking which set the stage for Wall St. Shenanigans and the current economic crisis, Robert Reich didn’t utter a single word of protest or warning.
Yeah, he talks beatifully, just like Obama and the rest of the Democrats but in reality there is no difference between them and the republicans. They are all Wall St. water carriers and servants.
Talk is cheap but actions is what count.

Report this
mrfreeze's avatar

By mrfreeze, November 11, 2011 at 5:49 pm Link to this comment

Michael Cavlan RN - A simple answer to your comment:

All you need to do is read Reich’s “Locked in the Cabinet” to know that he NEVER drank the koolaid. Sure, NAFTA and all the rest happened, but do you think for one moment the “labor” secretary was going to have influence over that situation?????? It was inevitable, like Einstein discovering E=mc squared..

Unlike so many of the “experts” out there, Robert is one of the few I’d like watching my back in a good bar fight…..ok, he’s not tall enough to watch my back but….

Report this

By vince remus, November 11, 2011 at 5:42 pm Link to this comment

How can Robert Reich be so oblivious about the American History
and pretend that the founders wanted movements such as OWS to
blossom in the constitutional democracy they instituted?

The Founders wanted an island of wealth surrounded by a sea of
misery. The covert desideratum of building an island of wealth
lead to a rebellion in 1786 under similar conditions to OWS.

see shay’s rebellion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shays’_Rebellion

Report this

By Michael Cavlan RN, November 11, 2011 at 5:29 pm Link to this comment

My God.

Robert Reich. Labor Secretary under the Clinton Administration.

NAFTA, CAFTA, GAATT, WTO anyone?

But this is a fine piece of the bait and switch. I will give the elites props for their cleverness.

Bet we can guess who Robert will provide political cover, along with the talk of “disappointment but….” line.

Give you a clue.

Hopey Changey

As in hope for Goldman Sachs and the other Wall Street cronies. The change, well not so much.

Report this

By Henry, November 11, 2011 at 4:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

How can Robert Reich be so oblivious about American History to
assert that the occupation is the kind of movement the Founders
wanted when they planned for the constitution democracy?

The founders wanted the constitution to create an island of
wealth surrounded by a sea of misery. This covert desideratum
was welcome by protests in 1786. see shay’s rebellion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shays’_Rebellion

Report this

By jal, November 11, 2011 at 1:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Reich was already a DIFFERENT person when he was a student at Dartmouth,
1964-68. I worked in a printshop in Hanover NH and dealing with Reich you soon
saw him as a future “comer.” and quite different from many of the many silver-
spoon students.

You noted his short stature, but he was truly a Big-Man-on-Campus. He filled
long slots on WDCR the campus radio station and was in the middle of many
student activities. Never pretentious but ALWAYS very enthusiastic.

Born in Scranton, he also had an opportunity to experience the internatonal elite-
track. I’m gratified that he hasn’t allowed himself to be changed and still identifies
with the average American.

Report this

By gerard, November 11, 2011 at 12:35 pm Link to this comment

Quote:  “Reich has broken the mold by keeping his focus on the needs and concerns of the majority of Americans rather than the interests of the elites with whom he circulates.”
  I think it would be very helpful if a great many people could know the specifics of just what character traits or life experiences account for Reich’s “keeping his focus on the needs and concerns of the majority etc.”
  It’s a sure thing that the 99% have no clue as to just what factors enter into the thinking of highly privileged elites that prevent them from getting trapped in greed and thievery.  If it’s “empapthy”, let us know more about that illusive word:  What is it, how do you get it, is it learned or inate, how come it’s so rare, etc.?  Millions of vitally imporant and still unanswered questions!  Could Robert Reich perhaps help us out with knowledge gleaned from his own life experiences?  That would be valuable indeed.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.