|
|
June 18, 2013
|
|
Making Repression Our Business: The Pentagon’s Secret Training Missions in the Middle EastPosted on Dec 14, 2011
By Nick Turse (Page 3) TomDispatch has identified other regional training operations that CENTCOM failed to acknowledge, including Steppe Eagle, an annual multilateral exercise carried out in repressive Kazakhstan from July 31st to August 23rd which trained Kazakh troops in everything from convoy missions to conducting cordon and search operations. Then there was the Falcon Air Meet, an exercise focusing on close air-support tactics that even included a bombing contest, carried out in October by U.S., Jordanian, and Turkish air forces at Shaheed Mwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan. The U.S. military also conducted a seminar on public affairs and information operations with members of the Lebanese armed forces including, according to an American in attendance, a discussion of “the use of propaganda in regards to military information support operations.” In addition, there was a biannual joint underwater demolitions exercise, Operation Eager Mace, carried out with Kuwaiti forces. These training missions are only a fraction of the dozens carried out each year in secret, far from the prying eyes of the press or local populations. They are a key component of an outsized Pentagon support system that also shuttles aid and weaponry to a set of allied Middle Eastern kingdoms and autocracies. These joint missions ensure tight bonds between the U.S. military and the security forces of repressive governments throughout the region, offering Washington access and influence and the host nations of these exercises the latest military strategies, tactics, and tools of the trade at a moment when they are, or fear being, besieged by protesters seeking to tap into the democratic spirit sweeping the region. Secrets and Lies Advertisement The number of U.S. training exercises across the region disrupted by pro-democracy protests, or even basic information about the total number of the Pentagon’s regional training missions, their locations, durations, and who takes part in them, remain largely unknown. CENTCOM regularly keeps such information secret from the American public, not to mention populations across the Greater Middle East. The military also refused to comment on exercises scheduled for 2012. There is nonetheless good reason to believe that their number will rise as regional autocrats look to beat back the forces of change. “With the end of Operation New Dawn in Iraq and the reduction of surge forces in Afghanistan, USCENTCOM exercises will continue to focus on… mutual security concerns and build upon already strong, enduring relationships within the region,” a CENTCOM spokesman told TomDispatch by email. Since pro-democracy protests and popular revolt are the “security concerns” of regimes from Saudi Arabia and Bahrain to Jordan and Yemen, it is not hard to imagine just how the Pentagon’s advanced training methods, its schooling in counterinsurgency tactics, and its aid in intelligence gathering techniques might be used in the months ahead. This spring, as Operation African Lion proceeded and battered Moroccan protesters nursed their wounds, President Obama asserted that the “United States opposes the use of violence and repression against the people of the region” and supports basic human rights for citizens throughout the Greater Middle East. “And these rights,” he added, “include free speech, the freedom of peaceful assembly, the freedom of religion, equality for men and women under the rule of law, and the right to choose your own leaders—whether you live in Baghdad or Damascus, Sanaa or Tehran.” The question remains, does the United States believe the same is true for those who live in Amman, Kuwait City, Rabat, or Riyahd? And if so, why is the Pentagon strengthening the hands of repressive rulers in those capitals? Nick Turse is the associate editor of TomDispatch.com. An award-winning journalist, his work has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, The Nation and regularly at TomDispatch. This article is the third in his new series on the changing face of American empire. You can follow him on Twitter @NickTurse, on Tumblr and on Facebook. Copyright 2011 Nick Turse
1
2
3
Previous item: Climate Apartheid Next item: Richard Nixon’s Rosebud: Defrocked President Went Wild for Horses New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By LocalHero, December 26, 2011 at 12:16 pm Link to this comment
Nothing new here.
The arrested adolescents in the US military, at every opportunity, spew the nonsense that they are fighting for the freedom of you and I. What drivel. The military has always been the tip of the spear of the 1%. Sorry to burst your airless bubble, but you are nothing but a global police force for Big Oil, Big Pharma & Big Agra-Business.
HU-AH, brainwashed idiots!
Report thisBy blogdog, December 16, 2011 at 2:14 am Link to this comment
the mission is clear:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25955
A “Humanitarian War” on Syria? Military Escalation. Towards a Broader
Middle East-Central Asian War?
Part I of a three part series
by Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, August 9, 2011
“As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior
military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we were still on track for going
against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a
five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries,
beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia, and Sudan.”
General Wesley Clark
PART I I
The Pentagon’s “Salvador Option”: The Deployment of Death Squads in Iraq
and Syria
- by Michel Chossudovsky - 2011-08-16
An extended Middle East Central Asian war has been on the Pentagon’s drawing
board since the mid-1990s.
As part of this extended war scenario, the US-NATO alliance plans to wage a
military campaign against Syria under a UN sponsored “humanitarian mandate”.
Escalation is an integral part of the military agenda. Destabilization of sovereign
states through “regime change” is closely coordinated with military planning.
There is a military roadmap characterised by a sequence of US-NATO war
Report thistheaters.
By gerard, December 15, 2011 at 12:31 pm Link to this comment
The “repression” that underlies all the other repressions is the U.S. refusal to admit the evil which it is creating in the world with its policies of aggression, suppression and domination.
Report thisBy berniem, December 15, 2011 at 12:30 pm Link to this comment
Everyday this nation comes closer to becoming the actual embodiment of the Fourth Reich!!! FREE BRADLEY MANNING!!!!!
Report thisBy David J. Cyr, December 15, 2011 at 8:44 am Link to this comment
This Nick Turse article seeks to inform, but its title begins with a premise that is either uninformed or disinformation: “Making Repression Our Business”
The Corporate States of America isn’t just now making repression its business. It’s been in the business of repression ever since it was incorporated.
The function of the School of the America’s that Democrats have never closed when they could have has always been (and still is) to provide foreign military thugs a liberal education in the arts of torture, assassination, and other more nuanced means of political repression specifically targeting democracy advocates.
These global military “training exercises” in repression that Turse is reporting are executed at the pleasure and discretion of the Executive Branch’s Commander-In-Chief, Obama. They are metastasizing extensions of the School of the America’s program.
When Democrats provide progress, evil policies move on to be progressively more malignant.
Jill Stein for President:
http://www.jillstein.org
Voter Consent Wastes Dissent:
http://chenangogreens.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=498&Itemid=1
Report thisBy Leefeller, December 15, 2011 at 8:08 am Link to this comment
Damn, not other posts here yet? Well all I can say is repressive governments supported by US means repressive governments support each other? We have the Patriot Act, Our Own Homeland Security and now intended indefinite holding by our own military super seeding civil law, I give you the Rise of the 4 Reich! OH wait, ...what will the US Gestapo be called?
Report thisBy NZDoug, December 14, 2011 at 11:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
US aid brings instability to the govts of countries guilty of being cursed with oil who don’t
Report thissecum to asset stripping.
Judas is the hero.
Business is business.
Total destruction as the only solution guaranteed.