|
|
May 24, 2013
|
|
The Deadly Business of Climbing Cell TowersPosted on May 23, 2012
By Ryan Knutson, PBS Frontline and Liz Day, ProPublica (Page 3) Wally Reardon, a veteran climber who quit in 2002, takes photos and video whenever he spots workers free-climbing to raise awareness about the practice. It often occurs within clear view of on-site supervisors and has their tacit approval, he said. “Even the safest people I’ve worked with in the industry eventually will cave to it,” he said of the pressure to use such shortcuts. After 32-year-old William Knorr died in a 2004 fall, OSHA found that his supervisors had “completely disregarded” safety regulations to save “Time, Work, Money,” an investigation report said. “Was there a motive? Faster and Easier.” No one knows better than Ray Hull how time pressure can lead to injuries. Advertisement The project ran into a series of problems. The crane operator, deciding it was too windy to work, took his crane and left. Hull found replacement equipment, but it was in Texas, more than 15 hours away. Setting out to retrieve it, Hull and another tower hand, Frankie Ketchens, drove nonstop, taking turns behind the wheel. When they arrived back at the site two days later, there was a Nextel truck near the tower’s base. Hull assumed the carrier wanted to make sure the job was on time. He was mistaken—the driver was just a technician—but instead of returning to their motel to sleep, Hull and Ketchens immediately went to work. When Hull had climbed 240 feet to add a section to the tower, Ketchens pulled the wrong lever on equipment hoisting a huge piece of steel. The equipment broke away from the tower and fell to the ground—with Hull attached. His safety harness broke his fall momentarily, then snapped. Hull has no memory of falling or hitting the ground. When he came to, he saw Ketchens above him. “I said, ‘Frankie, I can’t live through this. You need to tell my family I love them,’ ” Hull recalled. According to court records, Hull suffered massive internal injuries. He sued three companies involved with the project, and received a settlement from the subcontractor that hired his firm. His case against Nextel was dismissed, however. In court documents, the carrier argued that its final project deadline was actually a month later and hadn’t compelled the climbers to take undue risks. The carrier also said it wasn’t responsible for Hull, who, as a subcontractor, was “three entities removed from any relationship with a NEXTEL entity.” (Nextel merged with Sprint in 2005. Sprint declined to comment on the case.) Hull’s injuries left him unable to climb towers. He started climbing at 14, following his father and grandfather into the business. Nearly nine years after the accident, he still misses it horribly. “There’s probably not a human being alive that loved their job as much as I did,” he said. “Everything that I could do was taken from me.” Watching an OSHA video of the accident scene for the first time late last year, his eyes welled with tears. “It was a bad day. Or a good day depending on which way you look at it,” he said. “I walked away from it.” * * *Cell carriers give several reasons for why they outsource tower work: Building and maintaining towers, though crucial to cell service, isn’t part of their core business. Contractors have greater expertise with construction. It’s more economical to hire workers where and when needed, given the up-and-down volume of work. “It makes good business sense for them to contract it out,” Watts said. But handling tower work this way also insulates companies atop the contracting chain from legal and regulatory consequences when there are accidents, industry insiders say. OSHA has the authority to cite carriers if it can prove they had direct control over work or knew of safety violations. Yet, even though some carriers set prices and timetables for tower jobs—and many of their technical specifications, down to how to color code coaxial cables—their supervisors typically stay off-site and do not manage jobs directly. The oversight system provides an incentive for them not to know too much about what’s happening on work sites, labor experts say. “Information that there are unsafe practices makes you responsible for fixing those practices,” said Thomas Kochan, a professor of management at MIT. AT&T contracts spell out precisely what level of responsibility it wishes to have over each aspect of tower projects. In a table called the Division of Responsibilities Matrix, the carrier lists more than 100 tasks and, for each one, indicates if AT&T wants responsibility for it, to be consulted on it, or to be informed about it.
1
2
3
4
5
NEXT PAGE >>>
Previous item: Black Community Poised to Follow Obama’s Leadership on Gay Rights Next item: A Catholic Spring? New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By mrfreeze, May 23, 2012 at 12:11 pm Link to this comment
This whole scenario of corporate interests “sub-contracting” their operations to other entities is the natural outcome of the virulent capitalism we practice in America today. If one buys into the notion that enterprises are run for the sole purpose of “shareholder value,” and that that value must be realized second by second (without regard to long-term consequences), then why bother worrying about stories like this?
In the end the only thing that matters is that shareholders make money no matter who or what is destroyed in the process. And, there are plenty of “capitalists” out there that can and will defend this paradigm. Also, the consumers of all these (presumably less expensive) products and services offered by these “lean, mean, money-making enterprises) will defend the paradigm…because, hey, “it’s cheaper ain’t it???”
It’s a race to the bottom my friends and the moneyed interests are ready to trample right over everyone and everything to ensure we’re at the back of the pack.
Report this