Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
February 24, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Hell No
The Other 43 Percent

Truthdig Bazaar more items

Email this item Print this item

The Arrival of the Warrior Corporation

Posted on Feb 25, 2012
ElDave (CC-BY)

By Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch

(Page 3)

The United States could have retreated, however partially, from the world to lick its wounds.  Instead, the country’s global stance as the “leader of the free world” and its role as self-appointed global policeman were never questioned, nor was the global military basing policy that underlay it.  In the midst of the Cold War, from Indonesia to Latin America, Japan to the Middle East, no diminution of U.S. imperial dreams was ever seriously considered.

The decision not to downsize its global military presence in the wake of Vietnam fused with the decision to create a military that would free Washington from worry about what the troops might think.  Soon enough, as Bacevich wrote, the new AVF would be made up of “highly trained, handsomely paid professionals who (assuming that the generals concur with the wishes of the political leadership) will go anywhere without question to do the bidding of the commander-in-chief.”  It would, in fact, open the way for a new kind of militarism at home and abroad.

The Arrival of the Warrior Corporation

In the wake of Vietnam, the wars ceased and, for a few years, war even fled American popular culture.  When it returned, the dogfights would be in outer space.  (Think Star Wars.)  In the meantime, a kind of stunned silence, a feeling of defeat, descended on the American polity—but not for long.  In the 1980s, the years of Ronald Reagan’s presidency, American-style war was carefully rebuilt, this time to new specifications.

Reagan himself declared Vietnam “a noble cause,” and a newly professionalized military, purged of malcontents and rebels, once again began invading small countries (Grenada, Panama).  At the same time, the Pentagon was investing thought and planning into how to put the media (blamed for defeat in Vietnam) in its rightful place and so give the public the war news it deserved.  In the process, reporters were first restrained from, then “pooled” in, and finally “embedded” in the war effort, while retired generals were sent into TV newsrooms like so many play-by-play analysts on Monday Night Football to narrate our wars as they were happening.  Meanwhile, the public was simply sidelined.

Year by year, war became an ever more American activity and yet grew ever more remote from most Americans.  The democratic citizen with a free mind and the ability to rebel had been sent home, and then demobilized on that home front as well.  As a result, despite the endless post-9/11 gab about honoring and supporting the troops, a mobilized “home front” sacrificing for those fighting in their name would become a relic of history in a country whose leaders had begun boasting of having the greatest military the world had ever seen.

It wasn’t, however, that no one was mobilizing.  In the space vacated by the citizen, mobilization continued, just in a different fashion.  Ever more mobilized, for instance, would be the powers of big science and the academy in the service of the Pentagon, the weapons makers, and the corporation. 

Meanwhile, over the years, that “professional” army, that “all-volunteer” force, began to change as well.  From the 1990s on, in a way that would have been inconceivable for a draft army, it began to be privatized—fused, that is, into the corporate way of war and profit.

War would now be fought not for or by the citizen, but quite literally for and by Lockheed Martin, Halliburton, KBR, DynCorp, Triple Canopy, and Blackwater (later Xe, even later Academi).  Meanwhile, that citizen was to shudder at the thought of our terrorist enemies and then go on with normal life as if nothing whatsoever were happening.  (“Get down to Disney World in Florida. Take your families and enjoy life the way we want it to be enjoyed,” was George W. Bush’s suggested response to the 9/11 attacks two weeks after they happened, with the “war on terror” already going on the books.)

Despite a paucity of real enemies of any substance, taxpayer dollars would pour into the coffers of the Pentagon and the military-industrial complex, as well as a new mini-homeland-security-industrial complex and a burgeoning intelligence-industrial complex, at levels unknown in the Cold War years.  Lobbyists would be everywhere and the times would be the best, even when, in the war zones, things were going badly indeed.


Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments
LocalHero's avatar

By LocalHero, March 29, 2012 at 11:53 pm Link to this comment

Night-Gaunt, if “mentally defective people” weren’t welcomed into the military, there wouldn’t BE a military.

As Kissinger said, “Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”

I hate the guy but that’s about right.

Report this
Night-Gaunt's avatar

By Night-Gaunt, February 27, 2012 at 4:21 pm Link to this comment

When was the last time you heard Corporate MSM news talking directly or indirectly about the corporate military forces working for the Pentagon an DoD? Their disposition, their casualties? Interviews from spokesmen? Maps of deployment? The numbers? The cost to us the tax payer? An through robots an armed remotes in operations as a force multiplier an extension force. Where, what types are in use an how much in deaths an cost to us an the country being attacked? So what we have is a de facto secret wars. But on a far wider scale than even the two official world wars.

Vietnam was a piker militarily for US with Cambodia an Laos secret bombing going on. Here they are in over 120 countries today! Our Special Forces have American Nazis in them again. The setting is so low for recruitment that gang bangers, Nazis, an mentally defective people are welcomed in.

With the on going Depression they are getting plenty people of nearly all ages applying since their job prospects are dim. That is a Depression draft in action.

I’m waiting for the Republic to fall.(With shudders.) The empire is just getting started. All they need do now is to take over. An economic disaster could put the billionaire religious an Libertarian fanatics in charge of us. We can still lose this. (Look at Rome when it shifted from a Republic to an Empire inside an out. It was an external empire, like we are, for some time before Caesar took over.)

Report this

By gerard, February 26, 2012 at 10:57 am Link to this comment

You know, it’s strange to me that I am the only one on any comments I have read that complain about the feeling of cowardice that drone-weaponry instantly brings to my mind.  There is something missing in the souls of people who are willing to invent these things, manufacture them, deploy them,, advocate them and tolerate them. Even I who (have nothing to do with them—famous last words!) feel dirty because my country employs them without so much as a shiver! Not that other weapons are any better—just somewhat more overt.
  Another irony while we’re at it: My country spends billions “surveilling” me and my neighbors daily, destroying our precious rights with the same kind of covert activity it seems to suspect we are about to employ against it! Thus the snake eats its own tail—drones creating drones to turn us into drones (worker bees).

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, February 26, 2012 at 10:48 am Link to this comment

Spot on post by you Cliff.

In 2008, I jumped from Independent to Republican so I could vote for Ron Paul in the Republican primaries here in Maryland. I had seen the writing on the wall then.  He didn’t beat McCain so I voted for Obama.  Obama has proved to be a liability to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in these past 3-1/2 years and his time is up.

The number one priority for this country has to be the demilitarization of America and its overseas empire,  The taxpayer should not fund groups like Xe, Blackwater and all the other quasi-military groups making problems to Americas foreign policy.

I already pay for an non-drafted supersized military with my ever expanding myriad of taxes, I do not want to pay for more unaccountable mercenaries a second time around.

I do not agree with alot of Ron Pauls domestic policies, however that is why we have a Congress and State Governments and why a Presidential veto can be overridden.

The president is our point guy for foreign policy and that policy has sucked for a long time.

Report this

By Cliff Carson, February 26, 2012 at 8:12 am Link to this comment

On Corporate Armies and Robot Weapons

PatrickHenry,  I agree with your statement. The following is a Commentary I wrote in August 2007 that was published on the Populist Site to be later picked up and ran on a Ron Paul site concerning this very issue.

What I see is a continued decline in our rights as Americans, an increasing re-distribution of the wealth of the average American Citizen to the Elite 1%, the declaration from an Elite managed Supreme Court that Corporations are considered as persons, through the influence of the Republican dominated ALEC group - a management of Corporate written Laws to impose on the people of America (except for the Elite 1% of course), resulting in an increasing drive to a Kleptocracy.

And this Corporate future managed America will have their own Armies and Robot weapons to control the masses.  That’s you and me.

We the people of America need to seriously began to demand and work for a return of our Government to the people of America.

Report this

By balkas, February 26, 2012 at 8:03 am Link to this comment

this piece is illuminating
i began to think of the ‘private army’ as the regular US army after US invaded and occupied iraq.
the socalled private army was, to me, just as private as the other US army.
but, then, is there anything of import in US that the ONE PERCENT don’t own?
how about schooling, MSM, banking, MIC, congress, w.h., judges, ‘educators’, sacerdotals, fbi, cia, city police, bounty hunters,
constitution, ‘laws’....?
so, what we have in US is the greatest diktatorship ever developed, but not of the proletariat or serving classes, but of the master
classes; the latter consisting perhaps of just 10% of US pop. 
and it did not require special knowledge to come up with the idea that the best way to get rural, uneducated, unemployed,
unemployable, patriotic americans to go soldiering, would be first to wage poverty to a sufficient degree and then the younguns would
gladly and proudly join the army to defend mom and pop; oops, amerrika, from the uncivilized world.
but what if rural [i am assuming that it is mostly rural boys and girls who have been joining the army since late seventies or later]
would stop joining the army in great numbers? not to worry! there are lots of dirt poor people in s.america, e.europe, asia, and afrika.
what if they’d not come? well, what would be wrong with hunting for them like they did for afrikans some 4 Cs ago?
—-and, of course, there will be always better weapons and better nukes available and then to be used in some disobedient and
defenseless regions, countries.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, February 26, 2012 at 5:54 am Link to this comment

The day after ‘The Terminator’ came out I’m sure some weapons designers were busy on this.

This type of warfare is taking foreign policy out of the hands of the Government and placing it into a number of boardrooms across America where justified killing and treaty compliance are unknown.

Report this

By Cliff Carson, February 25, 2012 at 9:38 pm Link to this comment

The thing about Corporate Armies and War Machines is that the incentive for war is manifested by its affect on the corporate bottom line.

No war, no profit to be made.  And Corporations are in business to make a profit.  A Corporation irrespective of what the Supreme Court says, is nothing more than an unthinking, unfeeling, entity, in essence an entity programmed to seek profit doing any action evil or not without remorse.

As to the Robots machines there is a problem.  They are remote controlled and can in-mass be defeated in at least two ways:

1.  Decode the telemetry and assume control of the robot.  Turn it upon its handlers.

2.  Destroy the communications Link.  Instructions to the robot must go thru a transmission device, in our current time that most likely will be Earth Link Satellites.

These can be blown out of Orbit as some Nations have already demonstrated.  China, one of the Nations, along with America has done just that. Destroy the Transmission link and the Robots go dark.

Either scenario is absolutely dangerous to the citizens of the country possessing robot war machines.  And a reliance on such war machines is the perfect death wish.

The only unhindered use of these methods of war that can be successful is against undeveloped Countries.

The little guys.  Those that have no way of fighting back.  Those that will never be a threat to America.

You know, like those we slap around now.  Those we want to impose Democracy on while we steal their resources.

Seems to me there is a moral issue here.

But as one Senator was overhead saying in those hallowed halls one day.  “War is the most profitable scheme ever invented-that is as long as you win.”

One more thing.  Drones owned by the Corporations may have a use on the future citizens of a once beacon of Freedom -  the United States.

Seems that I recall that Drones have already been approved to be used over American skies.

That sends a chill down my spine - how does it affect you?

Report this

By gerard, February 25, 2012 at 4:14 pm Link to this comment

I completely understand Kerryrose here, but alternately, I found this article robust and conclusive concerning the abject immorality and irresponsibility so characteristic of our recent recurring ventures at empire.  Another way of looking at these recent wars is “clean” war versus blood and guts—in that we can’t see the people who die except as “pictures.  “Sleight of mind.
In other words, the more virtual the less virtuous.
  For me the article is a “call to arms” of a very precise kind—that is, a “war” against corporatism
as such, divested as it is from responsibility for the havoc it wreaks—on the environment, on our bodies, on our very genes, thoughts and hopes for a humane future.  Now we simply have no way out except through—in other words, if we cannot find ways to be “through with violence”, then violence will certainly work through us till it disintegrates our brains and our spines and we disappear from the face of the earth. Ironically, the most “developed” nations will be the first to go.

Report this
kerryrose's avatar

By kerryrose, February 25, 2012 at 1:47 pm Link to this comment

‘Of course, it may never happen this way, in part because drones are anything but perfect or wonder weapons, and in part because ....’

It is not fair for a writer to build a plausible scenario, and ask us to follow it with him to it’s logical conclusion—- and then in the last paragraph lose his balls and abandon the whole endeavor—leaving his readers out to dry.


Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right 3, Site wide - Exposure Dynamics
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide