LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

I Can't Hear Myself Think

Massive Wildfire Rages in New Mexico

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Love and Consequences

Love and Consequences

By Margaret B. Jones
$16.47

more items

 
Reports

McChrystal Doesn’t Get It—Does Obama?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Oct 29, 2009
AP / David Guttenfelder

U.S. Marines walk through the sand inside Camp Leatherneck in Afghanistan’s Helmand province.

By Scott Ritter

(Page 3)

Of course, the future is not yet set in stone. The decision to dispatch more troops, although the subject of much rumor and speculation, has been delayed pending the final dispensation of Afghanistan’s controversial presidential election. One can only hope that President Obama will take advantage of this timely “pause” to reconsider his options regarding Afghanistan beyond the single-minded rush to reinforce a current policy the U.S. military has acknowledged as having gone nowhere in the eight years of American military engagement.

Vice President Joe Biden had earlier proposed a policy course that would have de-emphasized military engagement with the Taliban, focusing instead on rooting out the forces of al-Qaida still operating in Afghanistan and Pakistan. President Obama was reportedly not sold on Biden’s thinking when it was first presented last March. Perhaps now, upon reflection, the president will do the right thing and reduce America’s military involvement in both Afghanistan and Pakistan, either along the lines proposed by Vice President Biden, or through some other mechanism. There is no military solution to the problems facing the United States today in Afghanistan, and thus the correct course of action is to de-militarize the situation by reducing, not expanding, America’s military presence.

Clearly Gen. Stanley McChrystal is not the man for this task. He should be replaced by someone within the ranks of the U.S. military who shares Obama’s vision of peace, and with it the need to redefine the mission in South Asia. The legitimate requirements of American national security will not be satisfied by any massive military commitment to the region. Hopefully, President Obama will recognize this fact and get out. That would be a sign of greatness, and present to the American people and the rest of the world a leader worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize.

Scott Ritter is a former Marine intelligence officer, chief U.N. weapons inspector and the author of numerous books on foreign policy.

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By ChaoticGood, October 29, 2009 at 9:40 pm Link to this comment

There is no military solution in Afganistan.  As long as there are warlords who command the loyalties of the Afgan people, there can be no strong central government.

The people who artificially drew lines on a map and called it Afganistan, did not realise that it really should have been called the Pakistan tribal homeland.  That would have been far closer to the truth.  The tribal map would look very different and that is the one that should govern our actions in that area.

The General probably understands this fact, but must try to explain how he intends to “win” something that cannot be defined in modern American terms.

The only American analogy would be something such as asking General Custer how he intends to pacify the Indian nations.  America tamed its indigenous people by killing most of them and that is exactly what we will have to do to the Afgans if we want to win militarily.  Since that expediency is out of the question, then what is left?

The only way forward is a massive committment to nation-building.  Are we willing to build roads, schools, provide police, fire and medical care.
Also we need to provide jobs and protection from Taliban adventurism.  This means hundreds of billions of dollars invested and thousands more lives lost.

Also, what are we going to do about the real reasons for Pakistani tolerance of the Taliban.  You know, that pesky India/Pakistan problem that goes on and on.  Thats the one that Pakistani officials use to keep the minds of their people on how much they should hate India and keep their minds off how much money those same officials are stealing from the Pakistani treasury. 

Are we willing to do this for at least two generations?  This is what it will take to “win”.
Don’t we have problems at home that we should be tending to?

Report this

Page 3 of 3 pages  <  1 2 3

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.