  |
 |
| |
|
|
|  Iraq Vets Break Silence on Devastating Realities of WarPosted on Jul 12, 2007
Chris Hedges and Laila Al-Arian (Page 3)
The Enemy
American troops in Iraq lacked the training and support to communicate with or even understand Iraqi civilians, according to nineteen interviewees. Few spoke or read Arabic. They were offered little or no cultural or historical education about the country they controlled. Translators were either in short supply or unqualified. Any stereotypes about Islam and Arabs that soldiers and marines arrived with tended to solidify rapidly in the close confines of the military and the risky streets of Iraqi cities into a crude racism.
As Spc. Josh Middleton, 23, of New York City, who served in Baghdad and Mosul with the Second Battalion, Eighty-Second Airborne Division, from December 2004 to March 2005, pointed out, 20-year-old soldiers went from the humiliation of training--"getting yelled at every day if you have a dirty weapon"--to the streets of Iraq, where “it’s like life and death. And 40-year-old Iraqi men look at us with fear and we can--do you know what I mean?--we have this power that you can’t have. That’s really liberating. Life is just knocked down to this primal level.”
In Iraq, Specialist Middleton said, “a lot of guys really supported that whole concept that, you know, if they don’t speak English and they have darker skin, they’re not as human as us, so we can do what we want.”
In the scramble to get ready for Iraq, troops rarely learned more than how to say a handful of words in Arabic, depending mostly on a single manual, A Country Handbook, a Field-Ready Reference Publication, published by the Defense Department in September 2002. The book, as described by eight soldiers who received it, has pictures of Iraqi military vehicles, diagrams of how the Iraqi army is structured, images of Iraqi traffic signals and signs, and about four pages of basic Arabic phrases such as Do you speak English? I am an American. I am lost.
Iraqi culture, identity and customs were, according to at least a dozen soldiers and marines interviewed by The Nation, openly ridiculed in racist terms, with troops deriding “haji food,” “haji music” and “haji homes.” In the Muslim world, the word “haji” denotes someone who has made the pilgrimage to Mecca. But it is now used by American troops in the same way “gook” was used in Vietnam or “raghead” in Afghanistan.
“You can honestly see how the Iraqis in general or even Arabs in general are being, you know, kind of like dehumanized,” said Specialist Englehart. “Like it was very common for United States soldiers to call them derogatory terms, like camel jockeys or Jihad Johnny or, you know, sand nigger.”
According to Sergeant Millard and several others interviewed, “It becomes this racialized hatred towards Iraqis.” And this racist language, as Specialist Harmon pointed out, likely played a role in the level of violence directed at Iraqi civilians. “By calling them names,” he said, “they’re not people anymore. They’re just objects.”
Several interviewees emphasized that the military did set up, for training purposes, mock Iraqi villages peopled with actors who played the parts of civilians and insurgents. But they said that the constant danger in Iraq, and the fear it engendered, swiftly overtook such training.
“They were the law,” Specialist Harmon said of the soldiers in his unit in Al-Rashidiya, near Baghdad, which participated in raids and convoys. “They were very mean, very mean-spirited to them. A lot of cursing at them. And I’m like, Dude, these people don’t understand what you’re saying.... They used to say a lot, ‘Oh, they’ll understand when the gun is in their face.’”
Those few veterans who said they did try to reach out to Iraqis encountered fierce hostility from those in their units.
“I had the night shift one night at the aid station,” said Specialist Resta, recounting one such incident. “We were told from the first second that we arrived there, and this was in writing on the wall in our aid station, that we were not to treat Iraqi civilians unless they were about to die.... So these guys in the guard tower radio in, and they say they’ve got an Iraqi out there that’s asking for a doctor.
“So it’s really late at night, and I walk out there to the gate and I don’t even see the guy at first, and they point out to him and he’s standing there. Well, I mean he’s sitting, leaned up against this concrete barrier--like the median of the highway--we had as you approached the gate. And he’s sitting there leaned up against it and, uh, he’s out there, if you want to go and check on him, he’s out there. So I’m sitting there waiting for an interpreter, and the interpreter comes and I just walk out there in the open. And this guy, he has the shit kicked out of him. He was missing two teeth. He has a huge laceration on his head, he looked like he had broken his eye orbit and had some kind of injury to his knee.”
The Iraqi, Specialist Resta said, pleaded with him in broken English for help. He told Specialist Resta that there were men near the base who were waiting to kill him.
“I open a bag and I’m trying to get bandages out and the guys in the guard tower are yelling at me, ‘Get that fucking haji out of here,’” Specialist Resta said. “And I just look back at them and ignored them, and then they were saying, you know, ‘He doesn’t look like he’s about to die to me,’ ‘Tell him to go cry back to the fuckin’ IP [Iraqi police],’ and, you know, a whole bunch of stuff like that. So, you know, I’m kind of ignoring them and trying to get the story from this guy, and our doctor rolls up in an ambulance and from thirty to forty meters away looks out and says, shakes his head and says, ‘You know, he looks fine, he’s gonna be all right,’ and walks back to the passenger side of the ambulance, you know, kind of like, Get your ass over here and drive me back up to the clinic. So I’m standing there, and the whole time both this doctor and the guards are yelling at me, you know, to get rid of this guy, and at one point they’re yelling at me, when I’m saying, ‘No, let’s at least keep this guy here overnight, until it’s light out,’ because they wanted me to send him back out into the city, where he told me that people were waiting for him to kill him.
“When I asked if he’d be allowed to stay there, at least until it was light out, the response was, ‘Are you hearing this shit? I think Doc is part fucking haji,’” Specialist Resta said.
Specialist Resta gave in to the pressure and denied the man aid. The interpreter, he recalled, was furious, telling him that he had effectively condemned the man to death.
“So I walk inside the gate and the interpreter helps him up and the guy turns around to walk away and the guys in the guard tower go, say, ‘Tell him that if he comes back tonight he’s going to get fucking shot,’” Specialist Resta said. “And the interpreter just stared at them and looked at me and then looked back at them, and they nod their head, like, Yeah, we mean it. So he yells it to the Iraqi and the guy just flinches and turns back over his shoulder, and the interpreter says it again and he starts walking away again, you know, crying like a little kid. And that was that.”
Convoys
Two dozen soldiers interviewed said that this callousness toward Iraqi civilians was particularly evident in the operation of supply convoys--operations in which they participated. These convoys are the arteries that sustain the occupation, ferrying items such as water, mail, maintenance parts, sewage, food and fuel across Iraq. And these strings of tractor-trailers, operated by KBR (formerly Kellogg, Brown & Root) and other private contractors, required daily protection by the US military. Typically, according to these interviewees, supply convoys consisted of twenty to thirty trucks stretching half a mile down the road, with a Humvee military escort in front and back and at least one more in the center. Soldiers and marines also sometimes accompanied the drivers in the cabs of the tractor-trailers.
These convoys, ubiquitous in Iraq, were also, to many Iraqis, sources of wanton destruction.
According to descriptions culled from interviews with thirty-eight veterans who rode in convoys--guarding such runs as Kuwait to Nasiriya, Nasiriya to Baghdad and Balad to Kirkuk--when these columns of vehicles left their heavily fortified compounds they usually roared down the main supply routes, which often cut through densely populated areas, reaching speeds over sixty miles an hour. Governed by the rule that stagnation increases the likelihood of attack, convoys leapt meridians in traffic jams, ignored traffic signals, swerved without warning onto sidewalks, scattering pedestrians, and slammed into civilian vehicles, shoving them off the road. Iraqi civilians, including children, were frequently run over and killed. Veterans said they sometimes shot drivers of civilian cars that moved into convoy formations or attempted to pass convoys as a warning to other drivers to get out of the way.
“A moving target is harder to hit than a stationary one,” said Sgt. Ben Flanders, 28, a National Guardsman from Concord, New Hampshire, who served in Balad with the 172nd Mountain Infantry for eleven months beginning in March 2004. Flanders ran convoy routes out of Camp Anaconda, about thirty miles north of Baghdad. “So speed was your friend. And certainly in terms of IED detonation, absolutely, speed and spacing were the two things that could really determine whether or not you were going to get injured or killed or if they just completely missed, which happened.”
Following an explosion or ambush, soldiers in the heavily armed escort vehicles often fired indiscriminately in a furious effort to suppress further attacks, according to three veterans. The rapid bursts from belt-fed .50-caliber machine guns and SAWs (Squad Automatic Weapons, which can fire as many as 1,000 rounds per minute) left many civilians wounded or dead.
“One example I can give you, you know, we’d be cruising down the road in a convoy and all of the sudden, an IED blows up,” said Spc. Ben Schrader, 27, of Grand Junction, Colorado. He served in Baquba with the 263rd Armor Battalion, First Infantry Division, from February 2004 to February 2005. “And, you know, you’ve got these scared kids on these guns, and they just start opening fire. And there could be innocent people everywhere. And I’ve seen this, I mean, on numerous occasions where innocent people died because we’re cruising down and a bomb goes off.”
Several veterans said that IEDs, the preferred weapon of the Iraqi insurgency, were one of their greatest fears. Since the invasion in March 2003, IEDs have been responsible for killing more US troops--39.2 percent of the more than 3,500 killed--than any other method, according to the Brookings Institution, which monitors deaths in Iraq. This past May, IED attacks claimed ninety lives, the highest number of fatalities from roadside bombs since the beginning of the war.
“The second you left the gate of your base, you were always worried,” said Sergeant Flatt. “You were constantly watchful for IEDs. And you could never see them. I mean, it’s just by pure luck who’s getting killed and who’s not. If you’ve been in firefights earlier that day or that week, you’re even more stressed and insecure to a point where you’re almost trigger-happy.”
Sergeant Flatt was among twenty-four veterans who said they had witnessed or heard stories from those in their unit of unarmed civilians being shot or run over by convoys. These incidents, they said, were so numerous that many were never reported.
Sergeant Flatt recalled an incident in January 2005 when a convoy drove past him on one of the main highways in Mosul. “A car following got too close to their convoy,” he said. “Basically, they took shots at the car. Warning shots, I don’t know. But they shot the car. Well, one of the bullets happened to just pierce the windshield and went straight into the face of this woman in the car. And she was--well, as far as I know--instantly killed. I didn’t pull her out of the car or anything. Her son was driving the car, and she had her--she had three little girls in the back seat. And they came up to us, because we were actually sitting in a defensive position right next to the hospital, the main hospital in Mosul, the civilian hospital. And they drove up and she was obviously dead. And the girls were crying.”
On July 30, 2004, Sergeant Flanders was riding in the tail vehicle of a convoy on a pitch-black night, traveling from Camp Anaconda south to Taji, just north of Baghdad, when his unit was attacked with small-arms fire and RPGs (rocket-propelled grenades). He was about to get on the radio to warn the vehicle in front of him about the ambush when he saw his gunner unlock the turret and swivel it around in the direction of the shooting. He fired his MK-19, a 40-millimeter automatic grenade launcher capable of discharging up to 350 rounds per minute.
“He’s just holding the trigger down and it wound up jamming, so he didn’t get off as many shots maybe as he wanted,” Sergeant Flanders recalled. “But I said, ‘How many did you get off?’ ’Cause I knew they would be asking that. He said, ‘Twenty-three.’ He launched twenty-three grenades....
“I remember looking out the window and I saw a little hut, a little Iraqi house with a light on.... We were going so fast and obviously your adrenaline’s--you’re like tunnel vision, so you can’t really see what’s going on, you know? And it’s dark out and all that stuff. I couldn’t really see where the grenades were exploding, but it had to be exploding around the house or maybe even hit the house. Who knows? Who knows? And we were the last vehicle. We can’t stop.”
Convoys did not slow down or attempt to brake when civilians inadvertently got in front of their vehicles, according to the veterans who described them. Sgt. Kelly Dougherty, 29, from Cañon City, Colorado, was based at the Talil Air Base in Nasiriya with the Colorado National Guard’s 220th Military Police Company for a year beginning in February 2003. She recounted one incident she investigated in January 2004 on a six-lane highway south of Nasiriya that resembled numerous incidents described by other veterans.
“It’s like very barren desert, so most of the people that live there, they’re nomadic or they live in just little villages and have, like, camels and goats and stuff,” she recalled. “There was then a little boy--I would say he was about 10 because we didn’t see the accident; we responded to it with the investigative team--a little Iraqi boy and he was crossing the highway with his, with three donkeys. A military convoy, transportation convoy driving north, hit him and the donkeys and killed all of them. When we got there, there were the dead donkeys and there was a little boy on the side of the road.
“We saw him there and, you know, we were upset because the convoy didn’t even stop,” she said. “They really, judging by the skid marks, they hardly even slowed down. But, I mean, that’s basically--basically, your order is that you never stop.”
Among supply convoys, there were enormous disparities based on the nationality of the drivers, according to Sergeant Flanders, who estimated that he ran more than 100 convoys in Balad, Baghdad, Falluja and Baquba. When drivers were not American, the trucks were often old, slow and prone to breakdowns, he said. The convoys operated by Nepalese, Egyptian or Pakistani drivers did not receive the same level of security, although the danger was more severe because of the poor quality of their vehicles. American drivers were usually placed in convoys about half the length of those run by foreign nationals and were given superior vehicles, body armor and better security. Sergeant Flanders said troops disliked being assigned to convoys run by foreign nationals, especially since, when the aging vehicles broke down, they had to remain and protect them until they could be recovered.
“It just seemed insane to run civilians around the country,” he added. “I mean, Iraq is such a security concern and it’s so dangerous and yet we have KBR just riding around, unarmed.... Remember those terrible judgments that we made about what Iraq would look like postconflict? I think this is another incarnation of that misjudgment, which would be that, Oh, it’ll be fine. We’ll put a Humvee in front, we’ll put a Humvee in back, we’ll put a Humvee in the middle, and we’ll just run with it.
“It was just shocking to me.... I was Army trained and I had a good gunner and I had radios and I could call on the radios and I could get an airstrike if I wanted to. I could get a Medevac.... And here these guys are just tooling around. And these guys are, like, they’re promised the world. They’re promised $120,000, tax free, and what kind of people take those jobs? Down-on-their-luck-type people, you know? Grandmothers. There were grandmothers there. I escorted a grandmother there and she did great. We went through an ambush and one of her guys got shot, and she was cool, calm and collected. Wonderful, great, good for her. What the hell is she doing there?
“We’re using these vulnerable, vulnerable convoys, which probably piss off more Iraqis than it actually helps in our relationship with them,” Flanders said, “just so that we can have comfort and air-conditioning and sodas--great--and PlayStations and camping chairs and greeting cards and stupid T-shirts that say, Who’s Your Baghdaddy?”
1
2
3
4
5
NEXT PAGE >>>
Previous item: Flynt to Capitol Hill Hypocrites: 'Payback's a Bitch' Next item: Still Queasy After All These Years Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. |
‘Collateral Damage’ Not Much Different from Targeted Killing
Email
Print
Share
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Ma.gnolia
Newsvine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Yahoo
Jump to Comments
By John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 28, 2007 at 6:08 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
(Still no response)
There is probably more evidence for 911 than there was for the Reichstag stunt. It is all historical and it is plenty enough to have a full investigation.
1. Rise of the Neocon supremicist movement at the U. of Chicago and Cornell.
2. Subversive nature of this movement
3. Plan for the New American Century as a subversive movement.
4. Rise of the Bush crime family syndicate.
5. Neocon headquarters in the pentagon and collusion with selected air force officers and the Israeli government.
6. Treason Act ready before 911.
7. Anthrax stunt against Democratic leaders.
8. Murder of Wellstone family.
6. Iraq war con.
You don’t have to know anything about the pentagon or skyscrapers to launch a real investigation. There is even more evidence in the cover ups.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 28, 2007 at 12:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Ernest Canning on 7/27 at 7:04 pm
(752 comments total)
ITW, who said I didnt want to read your post? I read it. I was not impressed by it. I think Dr. Joness scientific explanations are superior. No need to get emotional because I wasnt impressed by your post.
EC: Don’t worry, I won’t. I didn’t expect to change your mind. I have not seen compelling evidence to change my view of it, and I’ve seen a lot of easily discounted nonsense passed off as proof.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 27, 2007 at 9:47 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
There are many Jews with honor. They are no better or worse than anyone else, except tradition makes it so.
Report thisBy cann4ing, July 27, 2007 at 7:04 pm #
ITW, who said I didn’t want to read your post? I read it. I was not impressed by it. I think Dr. Jones’s scientific explanations are superior. No need to get emotional because I wasn’t impressed by your post.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 27, 2007 at 6:40 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
ohn Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming on 7/27 at 1:17 pm
(Unregistered commenter)
I still think you are a liar and that fly under nothing but a false flag.
********
Yeah, your feeble bigoted mind’s made up and you don’t want to get your ignorance tainted with facts.
I think YOU were shit out by the Great Pumpkin into a toxic waste heap full of dioxin because he didn’t want to bring your filth to all the little boys and girls on Halloween.
And I have just as much evidence for what I think as you have for what you think.
Only what I think is more interesting, creative, and just plain funny.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 27, 2007 at 1:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I still think you are a liar and that fly under nothing but a false flag.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 27, 2007 at 11:20 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming on 7/27 at 10:23 am
(Unregistered commenter)
All neocons are liars. You are a neocon. Therefore you are a liar.
Your logic is impeccable. But, of course, your premise is absurd.
I am no neocon, no fan of neocons, and accept nothing they put forth as valid.
As I said you just keep throwing lis and shit at the wall to see what sticks. But it’s splattering all over you.
You don’t know shit from shinola about me, but since I KNOW you are an ignorant idiot and show it all the time, you say whatever you can invent. You don’t even show any imagination.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 27, 2007 at 10:23 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
All neocons are liars. You are a neocon. Therefore you are a liar.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 27, 2007 at 8:22 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
ohn Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming on 7/26 at 10:23 am
(Unregistered commenter)
There is no right to exist for any nation. Israels right to exist rests upon 150 nuclear weapons. I suppose you have dual citizenship, which means that you support Israel first and the United States second. Youve made your choice.
******
I guess you figure if you throw enough shit at a wall something will stick? So you just make up any lies you want and toss them out there.
I am NOT a dual citizen, nor an Israeli. I simply do not see any viable evidence that the destruction of Israel (and the subsequent murder or fleeing of 5.5 million) people can possibly be in the best interests of the USA or the Middle East.
I know that’s hard to see for you red-neck Jew-hating bigots who cut your teeth believe Jews have horns and are responsible for every evil in the world, from 9/11 to Hurricane Katrina, to the Tsunami in Asia a few years ago.
I can’t help your WILLFUL ignorance. Only you can. But I can label your bullshit as such.
Report thisBy the 1Sgt, July 26, 2007 at 4:24 pm #
#89737 by John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming on 7/26 at 10:23 am
(Unregistered commenter)
There is no right to exist for any nation. Israels right to exist rests upon 150 nuclear weapons. I suppose you have dual citizenship, which means that you support Israel first and the United States second. Youve made your choice.
=====================================================
A choice clearly illustrated with the responses given by ITW to date. Time and again we see the same pattern. When given a choice the answer is favor of the Jewish state by Jewish Americans, over the interest of the United States, the country that bore them. The current policies of the United States favor Israel and are partial to one side--so much so we have attacked and invaded Israel’s enemies. First Iraq and soon will be Iran.
This during a time when Israel practices APARTHEID with Arabs in their own homeland, caging them by the hundreds of thousands in a place called GAZA and the WEST BANK.
Then people here ask..."why do they hate us”?
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 26, 2007 at 10:23 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
There is no right to exist for any nation. Israel’s right to exist rests upon 150 nuclear weapons. I suppose you have dual citizenship, which means that you support Israel first and the United States second. You’ve made your choice.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 26, 2007 at 6:10 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
EC:
You don’t want to read what I post? Fine, nobody’s holding you at your keyboard at gunpoint.
You want to live in your pipe dreams that make no sense about “Jewish” conspiracies to alienate the BEST friend Israel has, well, that’s your problem.
I’ve lived to see PLENTY of them, all bogus and I’ve studied even more. From Joe Hill’s conviction, to the Palmer raids, to Sacco&Vanzetti;, to Charles Beard’s scurrilous implication that FDR was behind Pearl Harbor, to the assassinations of the 60’s, to Flight 800, Foster’s suicide and now, 9/11.
All bogus conspiracy theories. Joe Hill was killed for being IWW, Period.
Building 7 COULDN’T possibly have collapsed? Well, the buffs said Oswald COULDN’T have fired the shots--Oliver Stone made a big movie saying that.
All garbage. Oswald fired the shots--the early interpretation of the evidence, particularly the timing was all wrong. When the timing was fixed, all the anomalies vanished.
I’m intellectually dishonest? Because I KNOW BS when I see it (and smell it)? Because I trust FIRST my own analysis and brainpower, not the analysis of “authorities” solely because they have a title?
The evidence of “demolition” at the WTC just doesn’t wash and I’ve laid out the reasons why. YOU brushed them aside because in your reductionist thinking they contradict what you “know” to be true:
That a team of dedicated terrorists managed to bring down the WTC by a method even Tom Clancy knew--and DESCRIBED in “Debt of Honor”.
Occam’s Razor, Baby, Occam’s Razor.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 26, 2007 at 5:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming on 7/25 at 9:57 pm
(Unregistered commenter)
I am not a Jew-hating, Israel despising Fascist. You are, or you wouldnt use such insults as your standard fair. As far as Im concerned you are a vicious neo-con and a traitor. (No, I didnt read all your posts. Should I. People like you always return to the same old vomit.)
*****
Ludicrous. I’m Jewish. I defend Israel’s right to exist. I’m a Democrat.
Your assertions are so, well, weird, that you make GodSend look sane.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 25, 2007 at 9:57 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I am not a Jew-hating, Israel despising Fascist. You are, or you wouldn’t use such insults as your standard fair. As far as I’m concerned you are a vicious neo-con and a traitor. (No, I didn’t read all your posts. Should I. People like you always return to the same old vomit.)
Report thisBy cann4ing, July 25, 2007 at 8:49 pm #
No ITW, you feign politeness then return to your intellectual dishonesty. I have witnessed it too many times, and, frankly I’m tired of it. As I said in the previous post, I find the scientific explanations of a physicist like Dr. Steven E. Jones far more convincing. You can use the usual slander, “tin-hat conspiracy theorist,” as dismissive denigration all you want. The fact is that there are competing “theories” as to the source of the collapse of all three buildings. There is the “official theory” that the collapse was caused by fire--one that does not appear to square with basic science, and which bears a heavy burden of proof given than no high rise building in human history ever collapsed due to fire prior to 9/11. Then there are the unofficial “theories.”
Of all the explanations offered, Dr. Jones’s appears to be on the most solid, scientific footing. There is not one word in your argumentative posts that convinces me that the “official theories” are even credible.
Insult, yell and scream all you want. As I stated before, I am interested in the science, not in your political opinions. While I would be the first to join with you in rejecting the paranoid rantings of some posters that 9/11 is a Zionist plot, I suspect that your vociferous refusal to accept the science behind the issue of controlled demolition is in part motivated by your need to deny anything could connect this episode to one or more Zionists, though, from my perspective, if there was complicity, I suspect it had everything to do with Cheney’s insatiable lust for power, period!
Finally, your comment about the height of WTC 1 & 2 is intriguing and one worthy of a further open and full investigation. It may well explain why the squibs shooting out at higher levels (e.g. high level demolition) would have been needed in addition to the numerous explosions eye witnesses claim they heard occurring in the basements of the twin towers. It would also serve to explain the variation between the method of collapse of WTC 1 & 2 vs. WTC 7, though all three buildings collapsed into their own footprints, and although the ultra-high temperatures remained in the rubble for such an extended period, which is precisely what occurs when thermite is used in demolition.
As to WTC 7, the evidence is beyond overwhelming. The collapse was precisely what you see in controlled demolition. Controlled demolition is consistent with Larry Silverstein’s statement that they were given orders to “pull-it” and with Guiliani’s televised statement made on 9/11 to the effect that FEMA gave him 10-15 minutes advance notice that the building was going to collapse.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 25, 2007 at 6:24 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming on 7/25 at 10:42 am
(Unregistered commenter)
I think that inherit the wind uses insults to make people angry and then in all the confusion he offers weak arguments. You can tell that something is fishy because he uses the prescribed Republican insults and slanders in order to get things rolling. I think he fears that Israel was involved in 911, and so he wants to keep everyones attention on minutiae.
Actually, I don’t think you’ve really read my posts. Otherwise you’d KNOW I have opposed the war in Iraq since BEFORE it began. You’d know I cannot stand 99% of the Republican Party and want George W. Bush and Richard Cheney impeached, ousted then tried and convicted on charges of treason. You’d know I think Jimmy Carter was the wisest, most honest and most-far-seeing President since FDR--he was just lousy at Washington politics.
You’d know I want us OUT of Iraq and to BACK OFF on Iran. You’d know I DESPISE the fact the Bush BLEW an unbelievable opportunity to make peace with Iran after 9/11.
I have been called every kind of name by you Jew-hating Israel-despising fascists who want me to SHUT UP so you can enjoy your circle-jerk and get all horny for the idea of somebody dropping a mega-ton hydrogen bomb on Israel--because you are all such “humanists”.
I’m not afraid that Jews were behind 9/11. I’m afraid that fanatics like you will manufacture phony evidence to “prove” it--not enough to get convictions, but just enough to start what you really want: another purging of Jews--this time from America.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 25, 2007 at 10:42 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I think that “inherit the wind” uses insults to make people angry and then in all the confusion he offers weak arguments. You can tell that something is fishy because he uses the prescribed Republican insults and slanders in order to get things rolling. I think he fears that Israel was involved in 911, and so he wants to keep everyone’s attention on minutiae.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 25, 2007 at 4:56 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Ernest Canning on 7/24 at 9:34 pm
(695 comments total)
Whom, which is more reliable the science of a renouned physicist, Dr. Steven E. Jones, reflected in powerful and convincing academic papers and presentations or ITW and his NOVA program? Hmmm, thats a tough one. And your explanation, ITW, for the symetrical collapse of WTC 7 into its own footprint in the span of 6.6 seconds; WTC 7 which was not struck by a plane, is precisely what, ITW?
As you have repeated done with respect to other topics, your intellectual dishonesty is transparent and there for all to see.
***********
EC: I have TRIED to be polite to you, but you just keep coming back with insults and slander.
The physics of the collapse of the Twin Towers is not as complicated as you tin-foil hat conspiracy buffs try to make out.
If your analysis of the collapse of the twin towers is fundamentally WRONG (and it is) then the collapse of bldng 7 is no longer a valid component of your conspiracy theory.
See, you all have your logic backwards--the collapse of 7 being harder to explain does NOT indicate that the towers didn’t collapse as described--that’s typical ex post fact bad reasoning.
You have to first PROVE that the towers could not have collapsed as described, which I find ludicrous. The contained fire from jet fuel easily burns hot enough to burn the temper out of steel--you don’t need to melt the steel at all. Once the temper is gone, it’s not steel anymore, but soft iron, incapable of supporting the floors above. ALL the floors above fall like a giant sledge on the floor below, far exceeding its load limits.
Don’t believe me? Any carpenter with a hammer and a nail KNOWS you can’t just lean on the nail with the hammerhead and drive it--you have to SWING the hammer to develop kinetic energy. Simple, high school physics on how acceleration amplifies force.
So once the floors above drive down like a pile driver, the floor below collapses and now the ADDITIONAL weight is joined to hit the floor below, which collapse quicker and quicker. This isn’t hard to understand.
I also find the “demolition” theory absurd. Why? Several OBVIOUS reasons.
1)Because when buildings are demolished they are far, far smaller than the WTC. NOBODY has ever brought down a skyscraper of this order of magnitude.
2) EVERY film I’ve ever seen of a controlled demoltion, the building was ALWAYS wider than it is tall--occasionally you get fairly tall buildings but NEVER anything where the height is so much greater than the width.
3) (I think of this as the idiot argument--only an idiot would deny it) Placing charges to demolish and implode a building is not only a highly skilled profession, it is an INCREDIBLY time-consuming activity.
It can take MONTHS to plan and locate charges to bring down a fairly small structure.
During those months the demolition engineers REQUIRE complete and total access to the structure.
Most of the internals of the building must be removed in advance.
Charges are placed on each and every floor at key structural elements and timed to go off sequentially from top to bottom (there’s an order from inside to outside but that’s beyond my knowledge).
So the “demolition” argument requires lots of demolition engineers--LOTS of them--and nobody noticing.
They have to poke into EVERY nook and cranny in the buildings--and nobody notices.
They have to place THOUSANDS of charges--and nobody notices.
They have to run HUNDREDS of miles of wire--and nobody notices.
They have to test their connections and timing--and nobody notices.
They have to violate EVERY guiding principle of demolition safety--and nobody notices
They have break ALL these rules on a type and size of structure that NOBODY has ever demolished before.
They have to keep it all secret--despite the guys in hard hats, the explosive placements, the wiring, etc.
NOW you see why the demolition fantasy is pure crap.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 24, 2007 at 9:45 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Crooks cherry pick the facts, use gobbledeegook and gibberish, and act triumphal. Republicans are schooled in crookery because no one stands up to them, hoping they will just go away. For most lazy cowards, Hitler has to slap them in the face before they realize the danger. Republicans belong in Leavenworth.
Report thisBy cann4ing, July 24, 2007 at 9:34 pm #
Whom, which is more reliable the science of a renouned physicist, Dr. Steven E. Jones, reflected in powerful and convincing academic papers and presentations or ITW and his NOVA program? Hmmm, that’s a tough one. And your explanation, ITW, for the symetrical collapse of WTC 7 into its own footprint in the span of 6.6 seconds; WTC 7 which was “not” struck by a plane, is precisely what, ITW?
As you have repeated done with respect to other topics, your intellectual dishonesty is transparent and there for all to see.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 24, 2007 at 11:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
You don’t have to know all the details of the murder weapon (airplanes or explosives) to know that a murder is suspected. Usually murders are inside jobs. The external evidence is overwhelming of a conspiracy involving Israel, Pakistan, the GOP, etc.
Who benefited from 911? What is the psychopathic character of the Bush crime syndicate?
Still no real investigation. The bogus investigations after one year and one half speak volumes. All the other coverups speak volumes.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 24, 2007 at 3:57 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
cyrena on 7/23 at 3:26 pm
(488 comments total)
#88797 by Inherit The Wind on 7/23 at 4:14 am
You didnt read my post Wind, because of your illness. I said, that while the airplanes obviously hit the towers, (we saw THAT much with our own eyes) the airplanes DID NOT, (and I will repeat this again) the airplanes ARE NOT responsible for the collapse of the WTC. The towers fell in their tracks, because of all the explosives that had been placed on site.
Im not gonna have this conversation with you again. The AIRPLANES that we ALL saw crash into the towers, DID NOT bring them down.
Do ya get that?
*********
Sure did. And I got that you just contradicted what you said in post 88763, which was:
.I repeat, those airplanes DID NOT bring down ANY of the buildings at the WTC on 9-11. They may or may not have crashed into those towers,
**************
“May or may not have crashed into those towers”? Now you are changing your tune. I keep saying this:
YOU ARE ENTITLED TO YOUR OWN OPINIONS BUT YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO YOUR OWN FACTS!
Fact: A commercial jet liner loaded with passengers crashed into each of the WTC towers on 9/11/2001. Disputing that one fact alone is a mark of insanity.
All you tin-foil-hat types should look at the NOVA episode on the towers’ collapse. All the phony reasons why the planes couldn’t have brought down the towers were disproven years ago.
Meanwhile, I’m spending my time on something far more real and less magical than your ludicrous fantasies. Of course, I mean the latest Harry Potter book.
At least THERE the magic makes sense and follows a consistent internal logic. But, then again, Ms. Rowling never expected anyone to actually BELIEVE she was writing anything but entertaining make-believe.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 23, 2007 at 9:26 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
There is probably more evidence for 911 than there was for the Reichstag stunt. It is all historical and it is plenty enough to have a full investigation.
1. Rise of the Neocon supremicist movement at the U. of Chicago and Cornell.
2. Subversive nature of this movement
3. Plan for the New American Century as a subversive movement.
4. Rise of the Bush crime family syndicate.
5. Neocon headquarters in the pentagon and collusion with selected air force officers and the Israeli government.
6. Treason Act ready before 911.
7. Anthrax stunt against Democratic leaders.
8. Murder of Wellstone family.
6. I’m sure there is plenty more.
7. Treason
Report thisBy cann4ing, July 23, 2007 at 5:47 pm #
ITW, when it comes to 9/11 I am more interested in what the science shows than what the politicians claim.
The 10/8/06 paper by Dr. Steven E. Jones, a Physicist and Archemetrist, entitled “Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collpase?” examines thirteen separate areas which “challenge government reports and investigate[s] the controlled demolition hypothesis”
“1. Molten Metal: Flowing and in Pools
“2. Observed Tempeeratures around 1000 degreeC and Sulfidation in WTC 7
“3. Near-Symmetrical Collapse of WTC 7
“4. No Previous Skyscraper Collapse Due to Fires [none since either]
“5. Squib-timing during the Collapse of WTC 7
“6. Early Drop of North Tower Antenna
“7. Eyewitness Acounts of Flashes and Loud Explosions
“8 Ejection of Steel Beams and Debris--plumes from the Towers
“9. Rapid Collapses and Conservation of Momentum and Energy
“10 Controlled Demolition ‘Implosions” Require Skill
“11. Steel Column Temperatures of 800 degrees C Needed…
“12. Problems in the NIST Report: Inadequate Steel Temperatures and Tweaked Models
“13. NIST’s Failure to Show Visualizations.”
http://wtc7.net/articles/stevenjones_b7.html
WTC 7, by the way, was “not” struck by a plane. Housing offices of several U.S. intelligence agencies, it was one of the most secure in the nation, rendering it highly unlikely al Qaeda could have planted explosives. On 9/11 it collapsed into its own footprint in the span of 6.6 seconds. A video of its collapse is virtually identical to numerous available videos of buildings involved in controlled demolition.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 23, 2007 at 3:26 pm #
#88797 by Inherit The Wind on 7/23 at 4:14 am
You didn’t read my post Wind, because of your illness. I said, that while the airplanes obviously hit the towers, (we saw THAT much with our own eyes) the airplanes DID NOT, (and I will repeat this again) the airplanes ARE NOT responsible for the collapse of the WTC. The towers fell in their tracks, because of all the explosives that had been placed on site.
I’m not gonna have this conversation with you again. The AIRPLANES that we ALL saw crash into the towers, DID NOT bring them down.
Do ya get that?
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 23, 2007 at 2:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
The one thing that makes Republicans and Nazis most alike is their criminal philosophy which allows them to insult others at will, while ignoring ideas and facts.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 23, 2007 at 4:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Cyrena:
Chico Marx said it best: “Who you gonna believe: Me or your own eyes?”
I have friends who SAW the second plane hit the south tower. They didn’t allegedly see a plane. They didn’t see an “alleged” plane--they SAW THE F***ing PLANE CRASH OVER THEIR HEADS, you IDIOT! Got that? The only people who DOUBT there were planes are psychos like you who simply cannot believe that such a simple, elegant, brutal attack could have occurred and that the wonderful, peaceful Islamic jihadists could have been behind it!
Nor do they believe the VERY simple physics that brought down the towers. Only conspiracy theorists psychos like you buy into the “other” cause nonsense.
Cyrena’s definition of “crazy”: Disagreeing with her and NEVER giving in to her crap and never “going away”. See, because Cyrena wants me to shut up and go away, and HAS POSTED THAT, she now says I must be crazy because...I won’t!
Get a life, lady!
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 23, 2007 at 1:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
As a citizen, everyone has the right to believe and say whatever they want. I think that factions within Israel and Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and the U.S were involved in planning and executing 911. Proof? None. But, all the 911 coverups suggest conspiracy. Who benefited? Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the Bushies. Common sense and experience are all we have as citizens. I have an Israeli/US friend who agrees.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 22, 2007 at 9:31 pm #
Comment#88633 by Inherit The Wind on 7/22 at 5:11 am
Besides, theres that wonderful fact that jet fuel only burns at 500 deg F, not enough to soften steel. Im sure youre citing that bullshit as well (jet fuel burns at least 3x hotter than that in open air, and even hotter in enclosed spaces--EASILY hot enough to catastrophic weaken steel by burning out the temper)
Wind, in all of this blather, about jet fuel burn rates, (and Im more than a little bit familiar with jet fuel burn rates, and pretty much everything else that goes with operation a commercial airline operation) how does it lead you to consistently make accusations that I have claimed that the Zionists are behind the 9-11 operation? I have never suggested such a thing, because its never been proven, and as 911truthdog recently posted, WE DONT KNOW who arranged 9-11. Cheney knows, and Im sure there are a few others of his intimate circle that know as well. But beyond that, we dont.
Meantime, heres a news flash .none of your calculations on jet fuel burn rates are worth a damn, because those airplanes did NOT .I repeat, those airplanes DID NOT bring down ANY of the buildings at the WTC on 9-11. They may or may not have crashed into those towers, but let me repeat this for you .THAT DID NOT cause those buildings to turn to dust in less than an hour. Those WTC was blown up with explosives. How they got there, I do not know. The airplanes did not bring those towers down.
Writethat 5000 times, THE AIRPLANES DID NOT BRING DOWN THE WTC.
That should keep you busy for a while.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 22, 2007 at 9:05 pm #
#88636 by Inherit The Wind on 7/22 at 5:21 am
You’re a sickie Wind. And, prior to now, I’d never considered reporting you to the administrators. I’d also never had any reason to know for sure, if you were a man or a woman. Quite frankly, I’d been cutting you some slack, because your postings ring of possible menopausal symptoms. So no, with a handle like ITW, there was no reason to assume that you wouldnt be a woman, though I certainly understand that you could be a man as well. Thing is, I dont much give a shit.
I DO know that youre sick, and that you need some help, and I will of course retain the posting, in the event that I decide to report you. I havent yet, but youre working your way there. Someone in authority should at least be aware of your presence. We live in dangerous times now .the war on terror and all And quite frankly, you sound like you are an explosion waiting to happen.
So yeah, Im posting this to put you on notice. More of this kind of stuff will get you the kind of attention that you are presumably seeking. But, its a cut off your nose to spite your face action, which is ultimately very stupid. You should think before you post anything else. It could come back to haunt you.
Report thisBy M, July 22, 2007 at 8:37 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Everyone is hand in hand in this. Those who already have antisemitic tendencies or who feel alienated economically are blaming ‘the Jews’ but it’s much, much bigger than that. Basically, the Nazis (and lots of them were brought in to work for the CIA after WW2) hate Jews and want to get rid of them. Top-level Zionists do pretty well out of an atmosphere of antisemitism too and they want all Jews, identified or assimilated, to move to Israel because they have a longstanding wish to reestablish the Davidic kingdom (with themselves as the royalty of course). Saudi Arabian royalty wants the US to occupy Iraq to take the pressure off them because of the bases in Saudi Arabia and because Islamists threaten their own power structure. And all these guys, including the Italian mafia/Catholic church, HATE the ‘left’ (i.e anyone who talks about mushy things like equality, workers rights, public education etc etc). So they came up with this brilliant plan (as brilliant as thugs can devise) to achieve total domination. It doesn’t particularly matter to them if everyone suspects it’s an inside job because, if anything, it increases the fear and paranoia that they want to bring about. It’s a pretty depressing scenario. And it’s the ordinary Jew/Christian/Muslim who invariably suffers. Most Jews really are loyal to the country they reside in, many have assimilated to avoid being identified as ‘Jewish’ (e.g converted, taken up non Jewish names etc) but in the end, it’s going to make no difference. The charges of double loyalty invariably surface (with some justification), ordinary Jews face pogroms and getting kicked out again and again. Nazis are happy, Zionists are happy, mafia are happy. Cheap labor becomes abundant again. Life goes on and it happens all over again some time down the line. Ordo ab Chao.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 22, 2007 at 7:25 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I think you have it backwards Mordecai....YOU are the one trying to silence US.
Are you going to respond to the article I posted or will you just ignore it?
http://www.startribune.com/587/story/564047.html
*****
This is not a hard one to figure out, Schultz: Even the dummies and morons on the Republican side of the aisle have a far better grasp of what is in America’s interest than you ever will. They, at least, aren’t so riddled with hatred for all Jews that they can’t see straight, the way you are.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 22, 2007 at 7:23 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Children. Children.
Report thisBy the 1Sgt, July 22, 2007 at 5:51 pm #
#88636 by Inherit The Wind on 7/22 at 5:21 am
(Unregistered commenter)
Cyrena and the 1Sgt:
Is there ANYTHING you two WONT say to try to silence me?
===================================================
I think you have it backwards Mordecai....YOU are the one trying to silence US.
Are you going to respond to the article I posted or will you just ignore it?
http://www.startribune.com/587/story/564047.html
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 22, 2007 at 5:21 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Cyrena and the 1Sgt:
Is there ANYTHING you two WON’T say to try to silence me?
Are you SO terrified of having your drug-addled fantasies questioned and held up to scrutiny that you will do or say ANYTHING to shut me up and shut me off?
Why don’t you go whining to the administrators to cut me off:
“ITW is SO unfair!!! He uses logic and facts against us!!!! Boo-Hoo-hoo. And no matter WHAT insults we hurl or invent about him, he keeps coming back!!! WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! IT’S NOT FAIR!!!”
Maybe that will work.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 22, 2007 at 5:11 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
But, we can count on ITW, to always appear, anytime there is a possibility of capturing an innocent and apolitical reader, and turning them into a facist zionist.
The only thing I cant understand, is why ITW doesnt just MOVE to Israel, where all Jews, the world over, are welcome as citizens. And, as long as she stays on her side of the wall theres nothing to fear.
No, I dont expect that to happen, but it just seems like shed be so much happier there, and besides...theyve got all of that medical technology that she could benefit from.
****************
Oh, Horrors! I made a typo! That clearly means I MUST be a Zionist Fascist! But what about you? You can’t even keep the basic grammar of genders straight! You keep adding an ‘s’ in front of “he” when referring to me. If a typo makes me such a bad person, what does THAT make YOU????
I’ll tell you what it makes you: Infantile and unable to cope with getting what you pompously dish out.
Because I don’t subscribe to your nutty-ultra-left-wing tin-foil hat conspiracy fantasies that are now IDENTICAL to the nutty-ultra-right-wing-tin-foil hat crew, that means I have to hate America? Absurd!
And you assholes keep trying to say that. Sorry. I’m an American first. And will be unless you and George Bush get your wish and stifle all dissent and turn us into the fascist state you love. It is my FERVENT desire to prevent him AND you from gutting the American Constitution for political expediency.
Since you think the Arab Moslem nations are such bastions of freedom and liberal openmindedness, and you think (under your foil hat) that America is magically, demonically “possessed” by Jews, why don’t YOU move to one of those Utopias? I’m sure you’ll be happier as you freely wear your head scarf and burkha. You’re free to wear and free not to wear it--if you don’t mind being called a whore, being arrested, beaten and cursed.
Cyrena: You’ll never be a scholar. You buy into the tin-foil hat conspiracy fantasies that Arabs are too stupid to conceive and execute as elegant a plan as 9/11. Sure, no 767 hit WTC South. My friend who was standing under it really just saw a pigeon bang into the building, right? (BTW, he ran out of Bld 7 after North was hit).
Besides, there’s that wonderful fact that jet fuel only burns at 500 deg F, not enough to soften steel. I’m sure you’re citing that bullshit as well (jet fuel burns at least 3x hotter than that in open air, and even hotter in enclosed spaces--EASILY hot enough to catastrophic weaken steel by burning out the temper)
But, since you no scholar, you’ll never let facts clutter up YOUR “truth"--which is the Arab propaganda that “those evil Jews” were behind 9/11.
I’ll bet you still believe that crap that Oswald couldn’t have gotten the shots off that killed JFK. And I’ll bet you still believe in the “magic dancing bullet” as proof there was a conspiracy.
Scholar = Skeptic. Scholar ^= Cynic.
I may not be a pretty boy, but I’ll tell you what: At 210+lbs, shaving every day (face, not legs) I’d make a damn ugly woman. I think I’ll let John Travolta do that, instead.
Report thisBy the 1Sgt, July 22, 2007 at 4:50 am #
During the time Israel was BOMBING and destroying Lebanon with American made weapons, most of them supplied FREE OF CHARGE.(last year)
U.S. House backs Israel 410-8
http://www.startribune.com/587/story/564047.html
WASHINGTON—The House, displaying a foreign affairs solidarity lacking on issues like Iraq, voted overwhelmingly today to support Israel in its confrontation with Hezbollah guerrillas.
The nonbinding resolution is similar to one the Senate passed Tuesday. It harshly condemns Israel’s enemies and says Syria and Iran should be held accountable for providing Hezbollah with money and missile technology used to attack Israel.
Yet as Republican and Democratic leaders rally behind the measure in rare bipartisan fashion, a handful of lawmakers have quietly expressed reservations that the resolution was too much the result of a powerful lobbying force and attempts to court Jewish voters.
“This is the usual problem with any resolution that talks about Israel there are a lot of closet naysayers up there (in Congress), but they don’t want to be a target of the lobby” of Israel, said Eugene H. Bird, president of the Council for the National Interest, a group that harshly condemns Israel’s military campaign.
====================================================
Tell us more about the current “beneficial” relationship, ITW. A relationship in which the representatives of the country are afraid to object to KILLING and destruction by Israel, on a scale second only to the United States.
Report thisBy the 1Sgt, July 22, 2007 at 4:23 am #
#88614 by cyrena on 7/22 at 1:03 am
(452 comments total)
Well 1Sgt:
From the latest comment by Inherit, its pretty clear she didnt get it again.
===================================================
I think everyone else did, and that’s what counts.
This is the behavior you get from Israel activists, be they Americans or foreigners.
When you confront them with their own illogical statement, they cannot respond to it or they twist what was actually said/implied.
Report thisBy cyrena, July 22, 2007 at 1:03 am #
Well 1Sgt:
From the latest comment by Inherit, it’s pretty clear she didn’t get it again. When you said that our relationship with Israel is really NOT to our benefit, and could in fact bring ultimate harm to the innocents of Israel as well, she kicked in with this…
...."You have a truly sick definition of being an American, since it seems to necessitate the destruction of Israle and the slaughter, as you put it, of many innocent people there.>
See what I mean? Nobody (including you) said that being an American necessitates the destruction of Israel, (which ITW mispelled...but she’s forgiven). And, that’s the way it always is with her. Same with lilmamzer.
Absolutely ANY criticism of our dysfunctional relationship with Israel is going to immediately initiate the accusation that you/I/we/anybody, wants to DESTROY Israel. And, since we have heard nothing but this from these posters, (be they one and the same or not)it’s not going to change. Especially if you see that he/she can continue the above statement, with something like this:
..."I see no reason the relationship with Israel cannot and is not mutually beneficial to both nations.”....
Now, assuming that ITW really believes the above, (and...that is what she wrote) we have to assume that she is simply the psychologically dysfunctional person that she is, because no rational person can ever believe this. Obviously, our relationship with Israel has cost us not only BILLIONS of tax payer dollars, for which we have NEVER received the slightest bit of ANYTHING, (I’m still waiting to find out how Israel benefits US, but ITW has never been able to give us any examples of this, or what we might be receiving, for all of this money.)
So, in ITW, you’re dealing with a literate person of book knowlege, who is in denial, and lacking any common sense for how to utilize her literacy. Rather, she uses $100.00 words in place of the less expensive ones, because you can bury bullshit in those, slightly better than you can with everyday straightforward language.
So, when you explain that in the end, Israel puts her own people in as much danger as our leadership puts US, in defying the entire international community, and behaving as a rouge state. In the end, it means isolation, (as opposed to physical destruction) of Israel, and that’s the part that she doesn’t get. She doesn’t get that in this very demonic relationship between the US leadership and Israel...the evil twins joined at the hip...there can only be animosity and hatred toward US, because we have been so supportive of the crimes of Israel.
She’ll never get it...just as a handful of others on this post will never get it. Most of them don’t bother to try to defend these bogus position, and don’t come back.
But, we can count on ITW, to always appear, anytime there is a possibility of capturing an innocent and apolitical reader, and turning them into a facist zionist.
The only thing I can’t understand, is why ITW doesn’t just MOVE to Israel, where all Jews, the world over, are welcome as citizens. And, as long as she stays on her side of the “wall” there’s nothing to fear.
No, I don’t expect that to happen, but it just seems like she’d be so much happier there, and besides...they’ve got all of that medical technology that she could benefit from.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 21, 2007 at 5:22 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
If you are indeed an AMERICAN, you sure dont value the citizenship you have here. If you did, you would see, very clearly, the relationship we currently have with Israel is not to the benefit of the United States and may very well mean the end of Israel, unfortunately, for many innocent people there.
You have a truly sick definition of being an American, since it seems to necessitate the destruction of Israle and the slaughter, as you put it, “of many innocent people there.”
I see no reason the relationship with Israel cannot and is not mutually beneficial to both nations.
The last time our survival DEMANDED the eradication of another nation was the American Civil War and the “nation” that destruction was the CSA. Even WWII didn’t destroy Germany, Japan, or Italy.
The only “reason” to destroy Israel is to appease Arab nations so they’ll sell us oil at gouging prices.
I don’t challenge your right to your opinion, no matter how stupid and truly bizarre it it. I DO challenge your “right” to call for the purging of all Jews in the US Govt, while hiding behind the transparent shield of calling them “zionists”. I DO challenge your right to use false information and call it facts.
And I sure as HELL challenge your right to call me un-American because I don’t ascribe to and actively challenge your lunatic tin-foil hat ideas about “secret invaders” and some magical satanic control of our government by Jews.
Maybe there’s a Roswell forum you can join. Oh, wait--Truthdig is rapidly turning into one.
Just a hint-- I don’t think it matters if the tinfoil is wrinkled or smooth--I think what matters is that you and GodSend are dangerously nuts.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 21, 2007 at 4:29 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Zionists are crooks just like Jesuits and Funda-Nazis are crooks. A crook believes in using force (insults) or fraud (lies) in order to overcome or neutralize his opposition. They are basically intellectually and morally dishonest and that gives them a temporary advantage.
Report thisBy the 1Sgt, July 21, 2007 at 2:44 pm #
#88460 by Inherit The Wind on 7/21 at 3:59 am
(Unregistered commenter)
All I am is an American citizen DARING to express an opinion thats different than yours. That, to you, obviously is the definition of a crook.
==================================================
If you are indeed an AMERICAN, you sure don’t value the citizenship you have here. If you did, you would see, very clearly, the relationship we currently have with Israel is not to the benefit of the United States and may very well mean the end of Israel, unfortunately, for many innocent people there.
Report thisBy the 1Sgt, July 21, 2007 at 2:35 pm #
#88460 by Inherit The Wind on 7/21 at 3:59 am
(Unregistered commenter)
Thinking that way is UN-AMERICAN! DISSENT and disagreement ARE the American Way!
=================================================
EXCEPT if the disagreement and dissent refers to or involves the United States “special” relationship is unusually has with Israel, correct?
Then, this very AMERICAN characteristic is NAZI and ANTI SEMETIC.
Is that RIGHT?
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 21, 2007 at 3:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming on 7/19 at 5:12 pm
(Unregistered commenter)
“Inherit the Wind is a crook. I hope he stays close where we can keep an eye on him and learn from his tricks. That way he cant corrupt so many other sites.
**************
I’m a crook am I? Just what laws have I broken? Can you cite ONE criminal statute at a federal, state or local level you even THINK I broke? Can you show ANY evidence of it? The answer is NO!
All I am is an American citizen DARING to express an opinion that’s different than yours. That, to you, obviously is the definition of a crook.
Thinking that way is UN-AMERICAN! DISSENT and disagreement ARE the American Way!
You are such a lying asshole you don’t even know the definition of “crook”. You are just another neo-nazi propagandist throwing out any shit to can just to see if it sticks.
Try this: Until you ACTUALLY have an argument to post (even a bad, fallacious one) don’t post.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 20, 2007 at 5:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
With a huge lobby force of 2000:
4. The Unopposed War Lobby
by James Petras
The Zionist Power Configuration (ZPC) has over two thousand full-time functionaries, more than 250,000 activists, over a thousand billionaire and multi-millionaire political donors who contribute funds both political parties. The ZPC secures 20% of the US foreign military aid budget for Israel, over 95% congressional support for Israels boycott and armed incursions in Gaza, invasion of Lebanon and preemptive military option against Iran.....
http://www.bestcyrano.org/cyrano/?p=90
(I don’t remember voting for Israel or Pharmaceuticals or any of the other lobbying bastards that infect this nation like so many termites. They have a lot more power over things with their dirty money than I do.)
Instead of throwing filth hoping that something will stick…
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, July 20, 2007 at 8:39 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
How ironic. These are exactly the words that I should be saying to you, but youre really not worth the energy Wind.
What are you, 7 years old? “Nah, nah I’m rubber, you’re glue, whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you!”
And, not to worry, Im having no problems defending my academic work. I wouldnt publish it otherwise. It has been through the most rigorous of intellectual scrutiny.
Yeah, all the holocaust deniers like to say that too. I’ve SEEN what you post. I’ll stand by my judgement of your capabilities before I’ll bow to your anonymous “most rigorous...” I’m not worried. It’s not keeping me up nights. Thanks for your concern.
Consequently, I will spare you any reading of it. Its more truth than your mind could ever handle,
Yeah, I’m clearly so dumb I have to stick to Melvyn Paul Leffler and Steven Schuker for history. Heck, anything more complicated than Carl Sagan’s “Demon-Haunted World” and I’m LOST!
And James Joyce, Ernest Hemingway and Thomas Pynchon are beyond me so I have to stick to the bunny slopes of literature and read Umberto Eco, Thomas Wolfe, Herman Melville, Tom Stoppard and Mark Twain. And shame of shames--I like Tolkien and Rowling--I’m SO STUPID! I even read (gasp!) Tom Clancy and Sue Grafton!
I only read “Atlas Shrugged” for the sex scenes...but that way I can say I’ve read Ayn Rand…
and I sure dont wanna be the one responsible for actually getting you to go away. I was just hoping youd do it on you own.
No such luck, eh?
Nope. Figured that out all on your own, didja?
Have a nice day!
Report thisBy cyrena, July 19, 2007 at 11:01 pm #
Flash! Cyrena--You are entitled to your own opinion. You are NOT entitled to your own facts. And youll never be a scholar until you learn that. Until then you are just another anti-Semitic pro-Arab propagandist
*********************
How ironic. These are exactly the words that I should be saying to you, but you’re really not worth the energy Wind.
And, not to worry, I’m having no problems defending my academic work. I wouldn’t publish it otherwise. It has been through the most rigorous of intellectual scrutiny.
Consequently, I will spare you any reading of it. It’s more truth than your mind could ever handle, and I sure don’t wanna be the one responsible for actually getting you to “go away”. I was just hoping you’d do it on you own.
No such luck, eh?
Report thisBy Bukko in Australia, July 19, 2007 at 6:28 pm #
Ernest, I agree with you again. The best way to change things, for us little people, that is, is to work on people one by one. I’m always talking to people about what I see as the truth, in simple, understandable, usually humourous ways. If you speak the truth to working-class people, even if they’re right-wing, they’ll agree with you.
It’s not like you’re going to give them a “Saul on the road to Damascus” total conversion moment. But little by little, you can open up their thinking to slight changes. I did it with the apathetic and uninformed people I met in the U.S. (and with patients, families and co-workers in hospital, I had lots of chances) and now I do it here. If all of us worked on the interpersonal level, that’s the definition of a grassroot movement.
Report thisBy John Hanks, Laramie, Wyoming, July 19, 2007 at 5:12 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
“Inherit the Wind” is a crook. I hope he stays close whe