LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     robert scheer     barack obama     gay marriage     ndaa     chris hedges
Most Read

Say 'Hi-Ho!' as They Strip-Search You

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

I Can't Hear Myself Think

Massive Wildfire Rages in New Mexico

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Zinn Is Dead—Long Live ‘Zinn’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jan 28, 2010

By Fred Branfman

(Page 2)

—Passion for social justice, an antiquated concept these days, in which a new generation of Americans has come to believe that “collateral damage” is inevitable in war, the very idea of war crimes irrelevant, and that the poor are responsible for their poverty. “Zinn” and “Chomsky” have meant never losing the passion for justice, a passion that began for Howard when he realized, as a bombardier in World War II, that he was often bombing the innocent not out of military necessity but mere inertia and indifference.

—Above all integrity, authenticity, wholeness. “Zinn” and “Chomsky” are embodiments of that word so often praised but so rarely practiced. They have practiced what they have preached. I have never seen either act out of character. I remember well when I first met Howard in Laos in 1968 as he and Dan Berrigan were on their way to Hanoi to escort U.S. POWs home. “What political system did he believe in?,” I asked. He smiled in his wry way, grinned his wide grin, and answered in that soft, Brooklyn-tinged but clear way of his: “I guess the closest is the kind of anarcho-syndicalism they had in the Spanish Civil War,” he responded. As we talked, I understood that he knew too much to put faith in any government, right or left, that “anarcho-syndicalism” was a way of saying he remained idealistic that humans could theoretically live sanely. But he never fell into the trap that many of us have of projecting our ideals onto the fallible humans who hold power in any system, left or right, and are inevitably corrupted by it.

The integrity conveyed by the words “Zinn” and “Chomsky” is, in the end, impossible to pin down. They have been cut from an older, different cloth. Their roots lie in an earlier time when those fighting for peace and social justice did so because of who they were, not because they sought personal power or to realize fantasies of “revolution.” I asked Howard last January what kept him continuing to fight, write and speak for peace and social justice when it all seemed so hopeless. His answer was as simple as it was profound. “I couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t.” The meaning of the words were far less important than the wave of feeling that moved through me as he said them, a wave of feeling that cut through the rationalizing and intellectualizing and connected with the deepest part of me that feels the same way.

The most important role that “Zinn” and “Chomsky” (whom I also met in Laos, in 1970) have played in my life has been to serve as nouns reminding me of my highest self. I cannot describe how often, consciously or unbidden, I have found myself thinking, “How would Howard see this? What would Howard say? What would Noam do in this case?”

Advertisement

And the deepest role they have played in my life became apparent to me only in recent years, as I began to explore my unconscious. I realized that they represented a kind of moral center in my life, a compass, a guiding star. This or that politician in whom I had believed might turn out to have feet of clay. I might betray my own ideals. I might drop out for a while, become despairing. But knowing that “Zinn” and “Chomsky” did not, that they fought consistently for their ideas, did not get corrupted by the temptations of power, meant that somewhere, someplace, there remained a still point of integrity in this world.

Somewhere, someplace, it was possible to remain a human being with compassion, intellectual clarity, moral courage, a passion for social justice and, above all, integrity.  Somewhere, someplace, the world was not entirely sick, corrupted, confused or compromised.

These “Zinn” and “Chomsky” states of being, which meant so much to me, also made me feel conflicted about the persons Zinn and Chomsky at various points in my life, particularly when I went into electoral politics in the 1980s. I projected onto them that they, who had kept their integrity, would look down on me for getting involved in electoral politics. I assumed they would find my rationale for doing so morally or intellectually compromised. I tended to avoid them during this period.

I also sometimes saw them as naive. When I talked to Howard shortly after John Kerry was nominated for president he said forcefully that Kerry had better run against the Iraq war if he wanted to win. My internal reaction was something along the lines of “Oh, there he is, good old Howard, naive romantic to the end. No one can hope to win the presidency without supporting the Iraq war.”

I did not foresee that Kerry’s key losing moment of the campaign would be saying he voted for the Iraq war before he voted against it, or that Barack Obama would win the presidency largely for opposing the Iraq war at a time when the conventional wisdom, embodied by Hillary Clinton, still held that supporting it was necessary to win. I did not foresee that a few years hence I would see myself as naive on this question, and Howard more realistic. Nor did I foresee that when I met with them again neither would judge me negatively for my forays into electoral politics. It had all been a projection on my part.


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

JDmysticDJ's avatar

By JDmysticDJ, February 2, 2010 at 8:24 pm Link to this comment

In passing, let me say that in a just, fair minded educational system, Howard Zinn’s “People’s History of the United States” would be available for study in every High School History Curriculum.

Let’s hope that someone, of equal genius, will step up to replace him.

Report this

By oleeb, February 2, 2010 at 7:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I knew Howard very well too and most of this is really good, but typical of your age group it ends up being all about you.  Your flourish at the end of no one being their to take Howard’s place or Chomsky’s when he goes is balderdash.  They are there and Howard would say they are their too.  We just don’t know them yet.  No wonder you made the error of thinking Howard naive.

Report this

By Gordy, January 31, 2010 at 9:14 am Link to this comment

Fred, the ‘Zinn’ you speak of is timeless and
attainable by all.  It’s not a quality you inherit
passively from your parents.  So long as there are
any kind of sentient beings in the universe, truth
and integrity - unaltered by history - will await
their discovery and service. 

Zinn set sail for a true north in the universe, and
would want you to do the same, rather than feel that
a light has gone out.  He received his light from
something that cannot be extinguished; it was not
‘his’ so did not ‘go out’. 

Still, though I say all that in earnest - I do know
how you feel.

Report this

By samosamo, January 31, 2010 at 7:54 am Link to this comment

By drbhelthi, January 31 at 10:53 am

Why did you just start the nazi connection with poopy sr. when
great grandpoopy prescott was the original american nazi
connection?

And grandpoopy surely had to be protected to some extent by
ol butterball j.edgar since he never spent time for his crimes of
collaborating with the enemy.

I would not be surprised of a linage based in germany for the
whole sorry lot of the bushwackers.

Report this
drbhelthi's avatar

By drbhelthi, January 31, 2010 at 5:53 am Link to this comment

In my experience, the choice for the US “presidency” in 2008 simply decided which “political party” would proceed with the Illuminazi-Neocon plan implemented by GHWBSr, while he directed the CIA in the 1960s. How a man with the background of Mr. Zinn could overlook the machine that has installed alleged “US presidents” since 1980, especially 2000 & 2004, and actually support a foreigner who does not provide a genuine birth certificate, evades my comprehension.

We should apply the wisdom of the derivative Mongolians who crossed the Aleutian chain 30,000 years ago, genuine owners of the alleged “american” continents: “what you do speaks so loud I cannot hear what you say”.  We discern that not only Mr. Hussein Obama is a shill for the highest bidder, but also several “US presidents” who preceded him.

It was a sad day in the history of the USofA when Allen Dulles hired NAZI SS General Gehlin to transform the OSS into the CIA, placing NAZI SS officers into key positions.  The list of CIA atrocities recently published by Congressman Dr. Ron Paul delineates the world-wide destruction accelerated by GHWBushSr, during his furtive reign in the CIA. The trillion dollars in “black hole” monies, in essence stolen from the US Treasury by the CIA without congressional approval, with assistance of Federal Reserve moguls, began the “snow-balling” deficit that now plagues the western world. Examplia gratia, 400 million passed out by CIA operatives in Summer 2009 to iranian locals while organizing the CIA uprising against Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, president of Iran.

I raise the question, was J. Edgar assassinated as a “payback” for revealing the letter written to him by GHWBushSr, which broke the cover of GHWBushSr?  Which letter attempted to sidetrack the murder investigation? Or did the NAZI leadership of the CIA simply want to replace J. Edgar with one of their own pimps, since they could not manipulate the strings of J. Edgar?

Report this

By sidneyfalco, January 30, 2010 at 9:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Howard Zinn deserves all the credit in the world. But he should have quit when he
was ahead, way, way ahead. That is to say, before the presidential election
campaign of 2008, when he supported Barack Obama in an unmitigated display of
political naivety that did much to demoralize the left. How in the world a man like
himself could fail to back someone much like himself—Ralph Nader—is beyond
the pale and must tarnish his otherwise illustrious career.

Report this

By NYCartist, January 29, 2010 at 3:31 pm Link to this comment

In my own fog, I forgot to say my condolences to Fred Branfman.

To antispin: It’s perfect for NPR to have David Horowitz speak about Howard Zinn.  It shows NPR as NPR is.  I loathe NPR. 

To PSmith: I read your comment.Thoughtful. All I want to say now is that there are good articles/essays popping up.  One is Paul Street’s on Znet, dated Jan.29, “The People’s Historian”. http://www.Zcommunications.org/znet

Report this

By antispin, January 29, 2010 at 3:22 pm Link to this comment

NPR brought in David Horowitz to condemn Zinn less than 24 hours after his passing.  Go to FAIR and register your outrage. http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=4009

Report this

By NYCartist, January 29, 2010 at 1:21 pm Link to this comment

I appreciate the author’s views and feelings, but poor Howard Zinn: even in death memorial article he’s paired with Noam Chomsky.  Zinn would appreciate the joke.  Zinn was wonderful.  See the article by his editor on The Progressive, Matthew Rothschild,too, which is linked on Zinn’s webpage
http://www.howardzinn.org.

Report this

By Che J, January 29, 2010 at 7:15 am Link to this comment

I have a very hard time believing in men like Chomsky, who not only denied
the possibility that Sept 11th was rigged and false, but expressed scorn and
derision toward those who were sober and perceptive enough to consider the
fact, obvious to a child, that the buildings could not have fallen in the manner
they did without being detonated.  By quelling this kind of discussion, the basis of questioning the ensuing events of a decade and perhaps a century was suppressed wholesale.

Howard Zinn was a more humble and patient intellectual whose mind moved
along much more willingly than Chomsky, but still was an old-fashioned man
from an era of special privilege for everyone of his gender and race.  How many
women and Blacks were denied the opportunity to be the ‘conscience of the
people’ so that Zinn could receive that honor?  How many women and Blacks had the kind of insights and courage by the age of 20 that Zinn spent a lifetime piecing together?  Were either Zinn or Chomsky ever in any kind of
fair competition for accomplishment?  How many White men receive this kind of
accolade every year while the world somehow continues to lose bits of its
humanity and dignity in an ever increasing downward spiral.  Both men found
ways to become accepted and loved for whatever truth they brought to the
public.  Could a courageous outspoken Black man
live to even half their age without being murdered?  Could a woman say half
the things they did without losing her reputation to a series of outrageously
trivial and demeaning attacks? 

I say these men were and are ‘safe’ placeholders taking up room for far more
meaningful heros who will make their way to us out of the whole of the human race and not just a fraction of it, and might someday actually spearhead real change and not
just provide the comfortable idea of it.

Report this

By Genny Berthault, January 29, 2010 at 6:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What a very beautiful article.

Report this

By jack, January 29, 2010 at 6:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Search Zinn and “left gatekeeper.”  I’m sorry for him and his family but he was part of the don’t-look-behind-the-curtain team.  Along with Goodman, Chomsky, et al.

Report this

By KISS, January 29, 2010 at 5:46 am Link to this comment

When we saw them mercilessly, pitilessly, amorally, criminally, deceitfully and undemocratically murder millions of innocent civilians”
Gee, just like today, but instead of one war and one country we now have 4 or 5 countries that we are the killing machine, all justified by our leaders.
Alas, no Zinn to help lead the marches, no King to point out the immorality of Amerika. Just the Buffoons we elect to be our fearless leaders.

Report this

By samosamo, January 28, 2010 at 9:55 pm Link to this comment

It’s is just a shame that someone like zinn has died, but won’t
we all, and that bill moyers will give up his pbs journal here
soon; but for long lasting evidence of a sort, and I am sure
neither of these two people, moyers or zinn, would they disapprove of any of Thomas Paine’s writings which very accurately and precisely defines what our and France’s revolutions created and the role of a republic of the people, for the people, by the people representation means versus the aristocracy representation of the oligarchy that controls our facade of a republic.

And damn it, the people still don’t care how subverted and
deconstructed our republic is as they sill live on BS msm crap.

Report this

By Jim Pandaru, January 28, 2010 at 7:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Howard Zinn was and will always be the man and conscience of the People. He led by example and taught us why we must speak truth to power. When we decide to take that first crucial step to stand up for what’s right and just, that’s when we’ll discover the inner strength and courage we had tucked away suddenly burst forth. Watch over us Howard. May the memory of what you spoke of and stood for guide us in building a better world.

Report this

By doublestandards/glasshouses, January 28, 2010 at 3:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Zinn on Moyer’s Journal in three parts last year. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIERifyW_aI

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.