Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Left Masthead
October 9, 2015
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Chaos Is the GOP’s New Normal

Primo Levi, Complete

Truthdig Bazaar

The Balloonist

By MacDonald Harris and Philip Pullman

more items

Print this item

State of Denial: Searching for Peace in Israel

Posted on Feb 12, 2010
soldier and boy
Wikimedia Commons / Justin McIntosh

A Palestinian boy and an Israeli soldier regard each other at the Israeli West Bank barrier in this photo from August 2004.

By Robert Fisk

(Page 2)

I don’t doubt that Stepan Bandera’s Ukrainian nationalist movement was a dodgy bunch of racists – and its original adherents were indeed anti-semitic murderers in the Second World War – but where does this end? The Simon Weisenthal Centre – named after a truly honourable man whom I once met in Vienna as he campaigned for Gypsy as well as Jewish victims of the Nazis – is the same organisation which is now proposing to build a ‘Museum of Tolerance’ on an ancient Muslim graveyard in west Jerusalem. And poor old Richard Goldstone, a Jewish jurist and another honourable man whom I met in the Hague when he was investigating war crimes in ex-Yugoslavia, is a ‘traitor’ because he said that Israeli soldiers may have committed war crimes in Gaza; in other words, Goldstone – for this is the point – should have allowed his ethnic origins to rule in Israel’s favour rather than abide by the rule of law.

Last week, in the dog-day resort of Herzliya, I attended much of the vast conference of Israel’s great and good – or at least the largely right-wing variety – to find out how they now saw the country that was founded amid such danger by Ben-Gurion 62 years ago. It was the same old story.

“The Palestinians are the ones who are today the naysayers” – this from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ‘security advisor’, Uzi Arad – and the Goldstone Report had now become part of an insidious campaign against Israel, an attempt to “delegitimise” (this is the newest cliché) the state. There were boycotts of Israeli goods. Bonfires were made of Israeli products. “I do not know anyone whose stomach does not turn” at such a sight, said Arad.

Michael Hoenlein, vice-chairman of the immensely powerful Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organisations, announced that Obama’s “engagement” with Syria and Iran had failed. Obama’s administration had been “supportive” over Goldstone (i.e. gutlessly supine in criticising a report which it had not even read). Obama now realised it had to work with Israel. There was unanimous consent in the US Senate over Iranian sanctions. No-one mentioned settlements or colonies. I was reminded of Hannah Arendt’s observation that the congress of World Zionist Organisation’s American section in October 1944 would “embrace the whole of Palestine, undivided and undiminished”. She went on: “This is a turning point in Zionist history… This time the Arabs were simply not mentioned in the resolution, which obviously leaves them the choice between voluntary emigration or second-class citizenship.”


Square, Site wide

For Arendt, the Atlantic City congress reflected “the tremendously increased importance of American Jewry and American Zionism…” The result was to forfeit any chance of Arab interlocutors, “leaving the door wide open for an outside power to take over”.
And it is worth quoting Arendt once more: “...the Zionists, if they continue to ignore the Mediterranean peoples and watch out only for the big faraway powers, will appear only as their tools, the agents of foreign and hostile interests. Jews who know their own history should be aware that such a state of affairs will inevitably lead to a new wave of Jew-hatred; the anti-semitism of tomorrow will assert that Jews not only profiteered from the presence of the foreign big powers in that region but had actually plotted it and hence are guilty of the consequences.”

At Herzliya, Arendt’s words were as if they did not exist. Repeatedly, we heard that Israeli officials might not be able to travel for fear of war crimes indictments against them – which suggests that Goldstone’s report is indeed biting. Danny Ayalon, the Deputy Foreign Minister who preposterously ‘sofa-ed’ the Turkish ambassador last month, obviously smelt defeat for Obama’s original Cairo message of pro-Muslim appeasement and criticism of Israel. The Israeli-American relationship had “never been better”, he told us. Obama had pledged a $30bn (£19bn) package for Israel over 10 years, America had given “iron-clad” security guarantees to Israel. Israel’s antagonists will behave better “when the Arab side knows there is no daylight between Israel and the United States.”

Ron Prosor, Israel’s ambassador to London, announced that while Britain had once ruled the waves, it now ruled the airwaves. The battlefield was now in British universities, in Leeds, in Manchester, at SOAS, in institutions that preach to “students from all over the world” who enter into a “grinder” dominated by the “liberal left”. Ehud Barak – small, almost diminutive, hands constantly waving in front of his face but an oddly congenial personality, the kind of guy it would be good to have next to you at dinner – announced that Israel was “facing a complication of threats from near and far”. The “near” bit was the Palestinians, the “far”, of course, was Iran.

There could be no bi-national state – did anyone want a Bosnia or a Belfast in the Zionist dream? Barak, Defence Minister, former prime minister and – more interestingly – former head of military intelligence, was in orator mode. “I said to Arafat…I told Abu Mazen (Mahmoud Abbas) ‘Your most difficult decisions will have to be taken with your own people, not with Netanyahu’...” He quoted Barbara Tuchman on “the despotism of circumstances” and Robert Frost on “good fences make good neighbours”, he quoted Churchill – “a pessimist sees a difficulty in every opportunity.” And along came Salam Fayyad, Prime Minister of the Palestinian Authority, who apparently thought he was to take part in a discussion rather than make a speech. He pleaded for an end to settlement building – he did not use the word ‘colonisation’ – and to Israeli “incursions” and he did not – once – mention the word ‘Hamas’. An obedient man, Fayyad, a good guy, someone with whom the Israelis could ‘do business’ because – as Barak and his friends in the Israeli government keep telling us – “it takes two to tango.”

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By call me roy, March 24, 2010 at 7:35 am Link to this comment

Say, are you a movie stars? Your terrorist sounding rhetoric sounds just like the bad guys in the Arnold Swartzennegger movie “True Lies.”  It’s almost verbatim.
Also, the famous author Joel Richardson breaks new ground with a devastating account of the possible connection between the Biblical Antichrist and the Islamic Mahdi. The Bible predicts that in the last days a charismatic leader will establish a global following in the name of peace. The Quran also predicts that a man will rise up to lead the nations, pledging to usher in an era of peace. The man in the Quran is called the Mahdi, or Islam’s savior. However, the man in the Bible is the Antichrist. Could it be possible that they are one and the same person? Richardson’s stunning research and analysis suggest that it is.
Hey dude, I would recommend that you put this on your reading list, it could open some eyes?

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, February 19, 2010 at 9:47 pm Link to this comment


While I agree with you, I can assure that at TruthDig you are just p***ing into the wind.

Report this

By sharonsj, February 16, 2010 at 11:10 am Link to this comment

I would like to see a comparable article on searching for peace in Arab/Muslim countries.  You won’t find much encouraging there either, nor do you find the mainstream media talking about the endemic civil violence.  Muslims are killing each other in greater numbers when not attacking non-Muslims.  Egyptian Muslims are attacking Christian Copts.  Muslim Palestinians are attacking Christian Palestinians, and so forth.  And they all have run out whatever Jews may still be left or, in the case of Iran, hold them hostage.

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, February 15, 2010 at 5:21 am Link to this comment

Just a typographical error to note on the Feb1 14 post. The quote from Conrad is different rather than “dufferent”.

Report this

By johannes, February 15, 2010 at 3:58 am Link to this comment

To, Inherit the wind,

We have all some times very bad feelings about our country, not the citizen, bud the politics.

You as an person can maintain a certain distance from the politics executed by the Israeli governement, and still love and defend your feelings,
fot your ” roots ” and nostalgie for the Israel of ” Rabin “.

Maby you have read it all ready, the book from ” Benjamin Freedman “.


Report this

By Inherit The Wind, February 14, 2010 at 8:56 pm Link to this comment

johannes, February 14 at 9:32 pm #

The Jews I know, have an big problem, they love Israel, but hate his politics.


Johannes: This may be the single most perceptive and intelligent thing you’ve posted on Truthdig.  You’ve put in a nutshell my angst and frustration.  I think Israel is being run NOW by bad people, people as bad as Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, people even worse than John Ashcroft.

Report this

By johannes, February 14, 2010 at 5:46 pm Link to this comment

To Night gaunt,

If I was you, I should not be so very sure, about Israel this time, Iran has some secret on his sleeve.

Report this

By johannes, February 14, 2010 at 5:32 pm Link to this comment

The Problem is to be found in the past, as usual, never integrated, the chosen tribu, like Hitler with the Aryans.

More apartheid politic as in South Africa, in its haydays.

Living from money Pumped by their brothers, in frienly countrys, on land stolen from their neighbours.

An very good friend, sayd the following words : The good Jews are in their hart always humanist and socialist, bad Jews do not excist, they are not Jewish but Zionist.

The Jews I know, have an big problem, they love Israel, but hate his politics.

Report this
Night-Gaunt's avatar

By Night-Gaunt, February 14, 2010 at 3:02 pm Link to this comment

No John Ellis the Iranians would be too busy, even if they cared, to do anything about Palestine as the last remnants vanished from sight. Not when Israel is the sole nuclear power in the area. You forget that don’t you? Because they are circumspect about it. They let their enemies and friends know they have them but don’t boast about it. The recent posturing by Iran is laughable if not so tragic. The Iranians are so afraid of nuclear attack and the constant attack on them but not Israel, even though it is Iran that is following the law and Israel, along with Pakistan and India who are USA allies and also not in the Non-proliferation Treaty are not subject to the same treatment are they? Ironic isn’t it? By not constantly mentioning the nuclear arsenal of Israel, people have this strange idea of the dynamics of the region. Like yourself John Ellis. That only if Iran arms itself with nukes, for protection, would start an arms race! Not Israel.

The USA would destroy their sub fleet and clear out any such attempts at “blockade” by any of the countries there. Iran is the only one who might be able to try but that is all. The scenario you give is full of holes based upon the wrong assumption that Israel is helpless as is the USA. Not going to happen that way. Of course expect that during this time our gov’t will fall and be replaced by an oligarch dictatorship of corporate theocrats & then you will see what a full empire is like. Very efficient when it is run by psychopaths and their adherents—-morality is such an impediment to control. To them command & compassion are a fool’s mixture.

Report this
Samson's avatar

By Samson, February 14, 2010 at 9:58 am Link to this comment

Always remember that this initially became Israel’s “Holy Land” only after the Israelis marched in and slaughtered the Canaanites.

This has been going on for an awfully long time.

The sad part is that anyone would adopt the bloody ideas of these people, with all of their ‘eye for an eye’ ideas, as the basis for a religion.

The one thing Christians should always remember is that Jesus preached an end to all of this. He preached a message of ‘love thy brother’ and ‘love thy enemy’ as a direct opposition to this sort of thinking.

I’ve never understood why the Old Testament is even included in the Christian bible.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, February 14, 2010 at 8:52 am Link to this comment

How much money does your state contribute to Israel and what else could we do with that money?

Very good interactive map.

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, February 14, 2010 at 5:29 am Link to this comment

“They were conquerors, and for that you want only brute force—nothing to boast of, when you have it, since your strength is just an accident arising from the weakness of others. They grabbed what they could get for the sake of what was to be got. It was just robbery with violence, aggravated murder on a great scale, and men going at it blind—as is very proper for those who tackle a darkness. The conquest of the earth, which mostly means taking it away from those who have a dufferent complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves. is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much.”
JOSEPH CONRAD, Heart Of Darkness

Under the present world control, not looking into anything very much is paramount. Emotional mythology is very powerful alternative to rational thought.

Report this
ron_woodward's avatar

By ron_woodward, February 14, 2010 at 3:29 am Link to this comment

Expendable Citizens Should Unite in Common Cause
Citizens in the USA, Iran and Gaza have become expendable. In the US workers have been outsourced and the middle class has been denuded of net worth. An elite group of corporate communists administers government power through the military, the mass media and a set of legislative and judicial lackeys.
They have marginalized the people into a cadre of wage and debt slaves. They have expanded these evils worldwide through the monopolization of resources, by the distribution of toxic assets and by perpetual [preemptive] warfare. Many citizens are uncomfortable under the weight of a tyrant, but do nothing too conditioned by long years of oppression.
The Iranians sent their children to the west for education. Along with math and science, they absorbed heretical teachings on governance and philosophy. They took their learning to the streets many times defeated by brute force. As the US War on Terror proved, it is impossible to destroy a worthwhile idea with weapons.
Many in the Muslim World insist that Palestinians have been corrupted by the west [especially by proximity to Israel]. Their leaders begin hostilities indifferent to the casualties they bring.
We citizens realize our governments serve their interests and not ours. This process began when the first caveman conked his rival on the head to become the tribal leader. We cloud our vision with histories, personalities and commentary until we pound the active possibilities into the ground. The time horizons of 50+ years discussed are excuses for inaction. The first item on our agenda should be how we can survive for another 50 years.

Report this

By Jack, February 13, 2010 at 9:14 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Is Illan Pappe right that Ben-Gurion went around to personally give the orders for Plan D orally to commanders in the field so that there would be no record that he did so? Was he really trying to create a public record that would absolve him of responsibility for the worst of the atrocities that he was actually ordering? Is Fisk too kind to Ben-Gurion’s memory?

Report this
Robert's avatar

By Robert, February 13, 2010 at 8:06 pm Link to this comment

Zionism: A Fairy Tale That’s Become a Terrifying Nightmare

By Alan Hart

February 12, 2010

What is a Zionist today?

Short answer: One, not necessarily a Jew, who (to quote Balfour) supports the Zionist state of Israel “right or wrong” and who cannot or will not admit that a terrible wrong was done to the Palestinians by Zionism - a wrong that must be acknowledged and then corrected on terms acceptable to the Palestinians if there is ever to be peace and the countdown to catastrophe for all is to be stopped. The Arab word for the catastrophe of the original dispossession of the Palestinians is Nakba. In my view, Zionism’s Nakba denial is as obscene and as evil as denial of the Nazi holocaust.

One thing nobody can deny is the effectiveness of Zionism’s propaganda machine. Zionism’s spin doctors probably learned from the Nazis that the bigger the lies and the more frequently they are told, the more likely it is that they will be believed in the mainly Gentile, Judeo-Christian or Western world; and all the more so when the mainstream media is terrified of offending Zionism either too much or at all.

The biggest of all of Zionism’s propaganda lies is the one which asserts that Israel has lived in constant danger of annihilation, the “driving into the sea” of its Jews. As I document in detail in my book, Israel’s existence has never, ever, been in danger from any combination of Arab force. Not in 1948. Not in 1967. And not even in 1973. Zionism’s assertion to the contrary was the cover which allowed Israel to get away where it mattered most, in North America and Western Europe, with presenting its aggression (often state terrorism) as self-defense, and itself as the victim when actually it was, and is, the oppressor.

The companion propaganda lie is that Israel never had Arab partners for peace.


Click on link for the rest:

Report this

By TAO Walker, February 13, 2010 at 4:24 pm Link to this comment

“The Arab-Israeli conflict….” is being CONducted for exactly the same purpose as every other such CONflict over the last ten thousand years or so.  It is to satisfy the CONstant blood-sacrifice demanded of ‘his’ worshipers by “the-one-god” WAR.  Wearing many masks and known by as many names, this disembodied retro-viral entity feeds-off the misery (in all its gradations from chronic low-grade fear to pain-wracked death, and its CONsequent grief) of the now billions of inmates trapped in the virtual world-o’-hurt called “civilization.”

Even the allamericangod “money” pays tribute to WAR, and “power,” that seductive chimera so many pretend to serve, is nothing-at-all without WAR’s support.  So let’s quit all the make-believe rationalizations for why homo domesticus is addicted to armed “CONflict,” and admit the plain truth:  Their ‘god’ is an AWFUL ‘god’!....and any old excuse for spilling blood in ‘his’ “name” will do.

The ‘toll’ taken by the tin ‘god’ Lizzie is chump-change, tame Sisters and Brothers….and guess who’re the chumps?


Report this

By bozh, February 13, 2010 at 2:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Both the white ‘jews’ and christian lands my be uing the shemitc peoples with islamic, christian, and talmudic or mosheic cults.
Most white ‘jews’ [‘jews’ means an multiethnicity having no connection whatever with palestine or hebrews; including yehudim] are in diaspora; safe-rich-secure.

Actually ‘god’ cldn’t have ‘promised’ them a worst region to live in. It is devoid of lakes, rivers, minerals, game;surrounded with etern enemies.

It doesn’t augur well for dark-skinned shemites with mosheic cult that the ‘zionists’ [read please land robbers]have not yet established a state for ‘jews’ only nor an israel.
Israel is still borderless with no de jure recognition.
Now the question arises why is that so? Well,for one thing, palestina is not of any strategic value- only a political one.
So why recognize any israel? Nato/us need badly mayhem/disorder/‘terrorism’; thus avoidance of peace at any cost; especially, since costs to US/nato/israel are so little.
By avoiding peace in palestina, US/nato/isr was able to bring all arab fascists onside. So that was ‘great’ achievement for US/nato.

Palestinian leaderships are also strongly asocialistic just like israeli and US. So, birds of a feather eventually flock together.
Expect, tho, a one state solution in expalestina with white ‘jews’ leaving it in great numbers! When? Probably after total pacification of both afgh’n, syria, lebanon, iraq, and iran
more cld be said. tnx

Report this
Robert's avatar

By Robert, February 12, 2010 at 7:37 pm Link to this comment

February 5 - 7, 2010

NYT’s Israel Editor’s Sticky Situation

Ethan Bronner’s Conflict With Impartiality


Breaking the silence

“Recently, the Israeli organization “Breaking the Silence” published 96 testimonies by female Israeli soldiers. They describe a pervasive pattern of violence, harassment, theft, and humiliation practiced by Israeli forces against Palestinian men, women, and children. Below are excerpts:

“We caught a five-year-old… the officers just picked him up, slapped him around and put him in the jeep. The kid was crying and the officer next to me said ‘don’t cry’ and started laughing at him. Finally the kid cracked a smile – and suddenly the officer gave him a punch in the stomach. Why? ‘Don’t laugh in my face’ he said.”

“’s boring, so we’d create some action. We’d get on the radio, and say they threw stones at us, then someone would be arrested… There was a policewoman, she was bored, so okay, she said they threw stones at her. They asked her who threw them. ‘I don’t know, two in grey shirts, I didn’t manage to see them.’ They catch two guys with grey shirts… beat them. Is it them? ‘No, I don’t think so.’ Okay, a whole incident, people get beaten up. Nothing happened that day.”

“...two of our soldiers put him [a Palestinian child] in a jeep, and two weeks later the kid was walking around with casts on both arms and legs…they talked about it in the unit quite a lot - about how they sat him down and put his hand on the chair and simply broke it right there on the chair.”

An officer described soldiers shooting to death a nine-year-old as he was trying to run away: “They shot in the air, as they say – shot in the air in the lungs…”

In their testimonies, these soldiers emphasize that mistreatment of Palestinian civilians is widespread, routine, and known to everyone. Both the Israeli and the Palestinian press have published excerpts.

Yet, New York Times Bureau Chief Ethan Bronner has so far failed to report this information about Israeli forces.

And his son has just joined up.


Click on link for the rest:

Report this
EJH's avatar

By EJH, February 12, 2010 at 6:20 pm Link to this comment

Other commentators sometimes leave a reader with a
sense that there is hope for the Palestinians.  Fisk
does not do that.  Quite a downer, that Fisk.  Of
course, he is almost always right and, unfortunately, I
cannot see reason to doubt him on Palestine.

Report this

By ofersince72, February 12, 2010 at 5:43 pm Link to this comment

Night Gauntlet,
You and I have way more agreements then we
do disagreements!!!!!!!!

Report this
Night-Gaunt's avatar

By Night-Gaunt, February 12, 2010 at 5:02 pm Link to this comment

From what he observes you know it won’t end well for the Palestinians. And if the leaders of Israel finally get their attack on Iran? Expect the last 10% of Palestine to just vanish as if it were never there. The fog of war can do just that. No ovens or showers either, just the muscle of military force to burn them out with extreme prejudice.

Report this
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network