|
|
May 23, 2013
|
|
Raise Your Voices, Protest, Stop These WarsPosted on Dec 31, 2010
By Ron Kovic (Page 2) More than 40 years have passed since Dr. King spoke those words to an overflow crowd at the Riverside Church in New York City in 1967, and the tragic lessons of Vietnam continue to go unheeded. The same patterns of wars, lies, aggression and brutality continue to repeat themselves. Another country, another occupation, another reason to hate and fear, but in the end it is the same crime being committed over and over again, the same innocent civilians being killed, the same young men and women returning home in caskets and body bags and wheelchairs. We have petitioned our government time and time again. We have peacefully marched and demonstrated for over a decade, yet the killing and mayhem continues. Precious lives continue to be wasted as another generation of young men and women are squandered in this, our latest foreign policy debacle. Our leaders refuse to listen. They refuse to learn. How many more senseless wars, flag-draped caskets, grieving mothers, paraplegics, amputees, stressed-out sons and daughters, innocent civilians slaughtered before we finally decide to break the silence of this shameful night? Many of us trusted and believed that change would come, that these wars would end, and that we would finally we be listened to. But that is not at all what has happened. We have been tragically misled. We have been deceived and betrayed. We have been promised peace and we have been given war. We have been told there would be change and nothing is changing. Rather than learning the lessons from the disastrous fiasco in Iraq, our government continues down the path of destruction, brutality, aggression and war, dragging us deeper into another senseless and unnecessary conflict in Afghanistan. The physical and psychological battles from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will rage on for decades, deeply impacting the lives of citizens in all countries involved. Advertisement I have come to believe that there is nothing in the lives of human beings more terrifying than war, and nothing more important than for those of us who have experienced it to share its awful truth. A time comes when a people can no longer wait. A time comes when the agonies, the suffering, have become too great. A time comes when a people must act and do what is necessary. Lives are at stake. No longer can we trust the president or politicians to end these wars. No longer can we believe them when they say the troops will come home soon. They have long since lost their credibility. Each day that passes, another life is lost. Each hour that this war drags on, the need for a daring new approach by the anti-war movement becomes more apparent. Bold, creative, and imaginative leadership is needed, and I do not believe there is a group more suited for that task at this time than the veterans of our nation’s most recent conflict. At 10 a.m. on Thursday, Dec. 16, 2010, veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, including troops now serving in the armed forces of the United States, led a dramatic act of nonviolent civil disobedience in front of the White House in Washington, D.C., with other brave veterans and citizens, protesting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, calling for all troops to be brought home immediately and without delay. (Click here to learn more about this action) May this action and others like it in the days ahead represent a growing awareness by the American people that only they can end these wars and begin to redirect the priorities of our nation toward more positive and life-affirming goals. I am writing this letter to you today asking you to join them on that day—and the difficult days ahead, to bravely and with great dignity step over that line you’ve not stepped over before and begin to exert that powerful moral force you as veterans and active-duty troops represent; to raise your voices, to protest, to demonstrate, to end these wars and make our country a better place. This is my hope. This is my prayer. With great admiration and respect, Ron Kovic
1
2
Previous item: Obama’s Two-Year Economic Report Card Next item: Blizzard a Case of God-Blocking, Robertson Says New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Dr Carl Selnes (MSgt Ret), January 5, 2011 at 5:06 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I too have seen the devstation of war and the dehumanization that it brings. Thank you Sergeant Kovic for your sound advice and perspective…...
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, January 4, 2011 at 8:38 pm Link to this comment
The draftee resistance to Vietnam service was active outside and inside the military.
http://libcom.org/history/vietnam-gi-resistance
I remember the antiwar protests in D.C. in the late 60’s to early 70’s. There were many and they only grew larger and more violent.
Report thisBy surfnow, January 4, 2011 at 2:30 pm Link to this comment
I’m surprised so few commenters are familiar with Sir! No Sir- when it was released in 2006 it created a lot of needed debate. By all means rent it, but before, just read some of the reviews from google- Roger Ebert’s is a good one to start.
Report thisBy surfnow, January 4, 2011 at 10:52 am Link to this comment
Leefeller and Others:
For obvious reasons, as much as possible of the history of antiwar activity in the military during Vietnam has been supressed. But a very good start for your own research is the documentary , Sir! No Sir !
Report thisBy who'syourdebs, January 4, 2011 at 9:43 am Link to this comment
Thank you, Ron Kovic-you are a true American hero. When I went to my first anti-Viet Nam war march it was 1965 and it took place in Chicago. The numbers were in the hundreds, composed of mainly people under 25, with many priests and nuns in the mix. Marching down Clark Street, the winos in the flophouses were throwing down muscatel bottles, shouting “go back to Russia, where you belong.” Five years later, I stood on the Capitol mall in Washington, surrounded by a half million people, stretching as far as my eyes could see, all agreeing on one demand. Stop-the-War-Now! I never felt so enpowered, and have never felt so empowered since. Those in power, those responsible for This Endless War, are only afraid of one thing: people outside their homes and places of business and government with signs and chants. That’s when they know we’re serious; that’s when they feel our passion and commitment. Protest locally and nationally-but protest. Take those vacations days, or call in sick, if you have to, but go. They laugh at your votes. Remember. People are dying.
Report thisBy Leefeller, January 3, 2011 at 2:58 pm Link to this comment
Surfnows comment below; requires some substantiation or at least he or she citing a source would be useful, to support the below comments or contentions?
“One of the many,many historical aspects of the Sixties that has been willfully extricated from the record is the fact that so many troops on the ground in Vietnam simply refused to fight by 1970-1971, that the Pentagon and Nixon had to admit the war was over.”
Another comment from Surfnow in the same vane requiring substantiation, posted below: And all this time I thought they ended the stupid war in Vietnam because 57000 troops died and they did not have anyone left to send or they wanted to appease the protesting masses?
“Balkas:”
“Yeah. Another thing many are not aware of is this was one of the reasons that Nixon and the Pentagon had to go to a ramped up air war ( there were of course political reasons too)so many draftees were out and out refusing to fight on the ground.These years 1969-1971 also brough twho really knows how many instances of fragging.”
Now I was in Vietnam in 1968 and we heard rumors of fragging and many other stories from rumor control, though I never saw any incidence of anyone refusing to fight and may I ask how does one refuse to fight? And how does one find willfully extracted information?
Report thisBy tropicgirl, January 3, 2011 at 11:27 am Link to this comment
My friend, the anti-war movement is dead. The progressives killed it. And anyone still left in it has other motives, or will be used for such.
There is no bringing it back, in our lifetime, via liberals. Slim chance with conservatives who are awake.
Please see my remarks regarding the Nader article.
There will be no more “rising up”.
Report thisBy Robert Dov Levin "Bob", January 3, 2011 at 11:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
For over a decade I have been tortured under a neutralization campaign employing the CIA Torture Paradigm in conjuncture with ongoing illegal Cointelpro operations. As an FBI whistleblower twice wounded in the service of the American people, I have been blacklisted and denied the inalienable human rights of a person while my clandestine security clearance was repeatedly outed under the Bush occupation to serve as government’s passive sanction for my assassination. The Bush White House threatened me with their invention of a criminal charge if I did not remain silent. My invitation for all concerned to go pound salt stands…I will publish my blackfile summary report during the first quarter of 2011. All known culpable federal actors will be named along with at least one blacksite facility in the U.S. that is a legacy of CIA MK-ULTRA.
Report thisBy TAO Walker, January 2, 2011 at 8:48 pm Link to this comment
Ron Kovic has a ‘handle’ on both the ‘mechanics’ and the “unintended-side-effects” of WAR, Inc., UnLtd. “(M)rfreeze,” “gerard,” “REDHORSE,” and others add, from their Personal and cultural viewpoints, descriptions of other dimensions of the overall situation helpful to arriving at any worthwhile (that is to say, mutually beneficial, to ALL-concerned) Way effectively to address it.
What may still be lacking, though, and contributing to a strong tendency to see this myopically as a ‘local’ issue, a primarily “American” “problem,” is a sense of its macro-Biological origins and ramifications. The syndrome’s philosophical, institutional, and technical aspects are of-course more easily accessible for most people, so that’s what they pay their precious attention-to. That these are, by-and-large, essentially superficial symptoms (the equivalent of mere skin eruptions, rather than the deep-seated malignancy which generates them to distract us from its own presence and process), doesn’t lessen the value of the good intentions of those focused so intently, but vainly, upon them.
It does result, nevertheless, in the real agent of the disease process going about its degenerative “business” pretty-much unacknowledged, and so unaddressed, by nearly all of that component of Earth’s immune system whose vital function it is to do so. Right now, only the free wild remnant of Humanity never co-opted by the “civilization” disease continues to fulfill, as best we can, our Kind’s given organic function here.
As awful as it is, war is also only a symptom. Poverty is a symptom. Environmental degradation is a symptom. All the ills to which the virtual subspecies homo domesticus is heir are only symptoms. They’re obviously all “global” by now. They all have also their “individual”-ized manifestations in the lonely half-lives of our tame Sisters and Brothers.
What then is the actual malady? How has it erupted here? What can we do to heal our Mother Earth, and at the same time our own Kind, of it?
We are (perhaps mortally) afflicted with “self”-ishness. The minstrel/poet Bob Dylan has called it “the disease of conceit.” Some here have noticed that this Old Indian, who is just a free wild natural Human Person, and in no way ‘special,’ regularly emphasizes the CON in that term, to call attention to the false promise inherent in “self”-centrism….and in its over-arching human-ist orthodoxy.
We’ve come-by this CONdition honestly enough. The retro-viral entities which induce it in susceptible populations are as much a part of the Living Universe as the “flu-bug” is of our Living Arrangement here. That our Mother picked-up a variety of the thing may be unfortunate. It is hardly unheard-of.
Like some of its ‘local’ micro-strains, the cosmic agent operates by infesting some component of a Living Body’s natural immune system. Taking over its targets’ nuclei (the “operating system)”, the agent then uses its access to all the Host Body’s organic systems to degrade Her natural vitality into the various types of degenerate “energy” the thing “powers” its own “self” with. Its process effectively turns these corrupted components into “individual”-ized micro-versions of its “self.” These in-turn reproduce their “self,” in a process intended to be “self” sustaining (call it “civilization”)....until, anyway, the Hostess dies.
By then, the agent expects to be em-“powered” to move-on to its next target Planet, probably hitchhiking on some device its ‘local’ captives will’ve engineered and sent into “space.” One more Life-less world will be the only sign of its passage.
We’re not dead yet, Sisters and Brothers. We can get well by getting free of the sickening “self.”
We do that by Singing and Dancing together, with All Our Relations, Loving each other and Her who brung us to Life.
HokaHey!
Report thisBy surfnow, January 2, 2011 at 8:20 pm Link to this comment
“I have a respect for Mr. Kovic for his actions became once he became aware of the consequences of his actions, he acted in a different manner. But I have more respect for people who realized that it was wrong before they enlisted in the ‘military’ and refused to join and support the military effort”
INteresting point, Not One More!
Report thisI just finished reading Jon Krakauer’s book about Pat Tillman and it reminds me of what you say. PatTillman’s tragic death by friendly fire was bad enough , but the way the government’s propaganda appartus used his story was contemptible and obscene. BUt the real tragedy was that Pat Tillman was intelligent, educated and informed and totally understood how the invasion of Iraq was all about oil.And yet he still went back to Afghanistan even when he had a chance to end his commitment early. It just shows how powerful that mythology of the military hero is in our culture and how these young people get so caught up in it.
By skimohawk, January 2, 2011 at 7:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
responding to gerard: re: “skimohawk bemoans “no free press today”, apparently not realizing that WikiLeaks points to an answer for that problem”
When some 80% of the population gets its “news” from nationally-syndicated “mainstream” media, WikiLeaks is only relevant to that other 20%.
Additionally, that 80% is not listening to the content of any of the “WikiLeaks” material, but rather only the vilification and character assassination of Assange and Manning. The message Assange hoped to convey to the public got lost in a obfuscatory morass of misinformation.
After years of reviewing field reports and studies, the military determined the final outcome of close-quarter combat was more the result of who could fire more bullets faster, as opposed to a rifleman’s accuracy. The same rule applies with the news media: at the end of the day, the party that is able to broadcast more messages to more people wins the argument. The result has nothing to do with the truth or accuracy of the message.
A point I wonder about is whether or not the 20% who are actually listening consider: most of us are more than willing to concede some liberties in the name of “security”; and that a good many people understand and accept that governments ( as governments ) by necessity engage in espionage, duplicity, and fraud. None of the details in the “WikiLeaks” material come to me as any surprise at all, but rather serve only to present in black and white what many of us have known all along: our government(s) are perpetually engaged in all sorts of less than ethical enterprises.
It will take more than one Manning, and more than one Assange, to have a substantial effect in this regard.
Report thisIt will also require more than tapping into databases of only one government.
By Not One More!, January 2, 2011 at 7:22 pm Link to this comment
It wasn’t the slave owners who created slavery. It isn’t the soldiers who are committing war crimes. Or is it?
At some point the line is blurred as to who holds more responsibility for committing the war atrocities (the elected officials sending the soldiers to the illegal war or the soldiers who just follow orders and carry out the war crimes). But in the end, it makes little difference to the victims of these military actions because the last thing that they think about before the bullet tears through their body is ‘who is really responsible?’
I have a respect for Mr. Kovic for his actions became once he became aware of the consequences of his actions, he acted in a different manner. But I have more respect for people who realized that it was wrong before they enlisted in the ‘military’ and refused to join and support the military effort. (on another note, is it really a victory for humanity when openly gay people are now allowed to commit war crimes?)
I’m glad that Mr. Kovic is trying to raise the awareness of others so they don’t have to learn after the fact what the right thing to do is and that is tremendously important and I thank Mr. Kovic for spending 40 years of his life to that effort.
But what should also be stressed is how the ‘democrats’ are implicit in their support of a war based economy (it’s all about the money folks).
Support third party because as long as you are voting for a democrat you are supporting the status quo. Nothing has changed under Obama (but no big surprise there).
http://www.NotOneMore.US - take the Pledge for Peace
“I’d rather vote for what I want and not get it than vote for what I don’t want, and get it.” - Eugene Debs
Report thisBy mrfreeze, January 2, 2011 at 5:43 pm Link to this comment
Thanks Redhorse! Thanks Gerard!
Report thisBy REDHORSE, January 2, 2011 at 5:21 pm Link to this comment
18 Iraq/Afghan/Gulf Vets committ suicide daily in the U.S.A. More VietNam Vets have committed suicide than those who died in the war itself. The psychological/physical wounds of war cripple. They cripple the men and women who participate and they cripple the Nations that exploit senseless war for profit. Lines of moral demarcation define humanity. There is serious consequence for their violation. It doesn’t matter who did what, everybody pays.
It is obvious that America has entered a moral no-mans-land. Total corrupt human moral abdication by its political leadership, open destruction of its social/financial structures and predatory for profit exploitation of its citizens with no regard to consequence defines the reality. It ain’t something else.
MRFREEZE question isn’t hair splitting. The new Corporate Feudalists need mercenary armies. Their MIC shadow boys and D.C. revolving door fixers are the interface between International Black Market crime and coolers like Obama. QUESTION IS: What is an American fighter to think when he/she encounters mercs getting 5K a week to do the same job they are. Hell, their wife and kids back home are on food stamps. What do you think? These are the kinds of quandaries that arise when you allow psychopaths to seize control of your Nation. Remember when you hsd a Constitution and a Bill of Rights. Criminals by any other name are just as foul.
Our Vets deserve every benefit they receive and all the support we can give them. And you should keep in mind the fact that those D.C. flag wavers with their shiney lapel pins will cut a Vets throat at the drop of a hat. The other thing to remember is that in every instance listed above: It’s your money and labor footing the bill.
Report thisBy gerard, January 2, 2011 at 5:10 pm Link to this comment
Mr. Freeze: Probably veterans of illegal wars of conquest like Iraq and Afghanistan feel “entitled” because they joined voluntarily. Many did this because they saw it as their only, or “easiest” way to earn a regular income, there being few to no other jobs available to them. (Some fell for the hype as well, but not all, and nobody knows the percentages.)
Report thisAs a matter of fact the men and women who enlisted are not entirely wrong in regarding these wars as “industries” or “business enterprises” entitling workers to health benefits and pensions etc., though violent conquests are disguised as somehow different from businesses—more heroic, and certainly more dangerous to life and limb than working in a “business enterprise.” (The line is between the two has become extremely thin.)
The extra-severe risks involved cause veterans, (especially those returning with health and injury problems) feel “entitled” to all the benefits they need, and most of which were guaranteed to them by recruiters when they enlisted. I agree with them. The sad fact is that many are NOT getting necessary care and help promised.
Some even return home intending to reintegrate into “regular” society, but can’t find jobs, have changed so much due to war experiences, and end up re-enlisting against their better judgment.They see their civilian prospects and relationships ruined by their war experiences. They lose hope.
There is no amount of money or aid that can repair the damages they suffer, and they are entitled to every cent they ever collect—and then some.
The wise answer is to stop the “war business” and shut down the military-industrial complex rather than to depend on it as the “economic engine” of the “greatest democracy in the world.”
By Timothy Gawne, January 2, 2011 at 4:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Kudos. Well written.
There is only one thing that we as citizens can do.
WE NEED TO STOP VOTING FOR PEOPLE WHO KEEP FIGHTING STUPID WARS.
IF YOU WON’T VOTE AGAINST OBAMA YOU ARE SUPPORTING WAR.
EVEN IF PALIN IS WORSE.
OBAMA HAS BETRAYED US. WE NEED TO STOP WHINING ABOUT IT, ADMIT THE
TRUTH, AND OPPOSE HIM AS WE WOULD HIS POLITICAL TWIN GW BUSH. HE
NEEDS TO BE KICKED OUT OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN 2012 IN DISGRACE.
POLITICS 101: REWARD YOUR FRIENDS, PUNISH YOUR ENEMIES. All else is
babble.
Thank you for your consideration.
Report thisBy surfnow, January 2, 2011 at 3:54 pm Link to this comment
One More Thing Balkas:
Report thisIf you’re interested, there are some great documentaries available even at Netfilx- ” Winter Soldier” ” In the Year of the Pig” but espeically on the topic of troop insurrection- ” Sir! No Sir!”.
By mrfreeze, January 2, 2011 at 3:49 pm Link to this comment
I’d like to ask some of you commentators here if I’m imagining something:
1) The Veterans of former wars, starting with Vietnam and going back in time, seem to have a far better grasp of what being a soldier is and what terrible things happen as a result of war. I grew up during Vietnam and let’s face it, draftees are a very different group than the current “volunteers.”
2) The current veterans (and active military) strike me as “feeling entitled” to some sort of special treatment. During the holidays I perused a number of blogs having to do with the problems veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan face. What so disturbs me is that many vets seem to feel that they’ve “worked hard” for their country and they should be receiving a vast array of “benefits.” Many express disdain for the working-class who pay taxes to support their “quasi-welfare” lives. There’s the usual hero worship and self-adoration that comes with being soldiers. Yes, in today’s America all soldiers are “heroes.”
I’m afraid that the Military Industrial Complex is creating a whole new “class” of Americans who, by virtue of volunteering to fight in our ridiculous, illegal and costly wars somehow believe they have protected “the American Dream,” a dream I fear that applies to fewer and fewer Americans.
Report thisBy surfnow, January 2, 2011 at 3:46 pm Link to this comment
Balkas:
Report thisYeah. Another thing many are not aware of is this was one of the reasons that Nixon and the Pentagon had to go to a ramped up air war ( there were of course political reasons too)so many draftees were out and out refusing to fight on the ground.These years 1969-1971 also broughtwho really knows how many instances of fragging.By the way I agree with you. The sociopaths at the top of the military indutsrial complex couldn’t give a rat’s a** about protests at home- but epidemic insubrdination and insurrection in the field in Vietnam must still give them nightmares.
By Leefeller, January 2, 2011 at 1:32 pm Link to this comment
Making stuff up is not only for the MSM, the web seems to have its own affliction of BS.
Report thisBy balkas, January 2, 2011 at 12:49 pm Link to this comment
surfnow,
this is the first time i heard that so many u.s
soldiers refused to fight in vietnam from ‘71.
thus helping to stop u.s aggression there.
this bolsters my conclusion that no protest wld
ever even delay an u.s aggression let alone
prevent, or stop it once under way.
it seems only a threat, such soldiers not fighting
Report thisor dodging the fight and a political party, can
even prevent an aggression or stop it once
underway. tnx for the info!
By surfnow, January 2, 2011 at 12:29 pm Link to this comment
One of the many,many historical aspects of the Sixties that has been willfully extricated from the record is the fact that so many troops on the ground in Vietnam simply refused to fight by 1970-1971, that the Pentagon and Nixon had to admit the war was over. We’renot talking a few Army Units here or there, we are talking about entire Platoons and Companies of Army, Navy and even Marines. But of course the Amerikan mlitary -industrial complex is terrified of not only that truth but of that ever happening again, Which is why there will never be another drafted militray- the System only wants those sufficiently brainwashed, naive or just plain stupid to do their bidding.
Report thisBy Mike789, January 2, 2011 at 11:02 am Link to this comment
By PatrickHenry, January 1 at 4:58 pm Link to this comment:
“As long as we have the all volunteer army of mercenaries I feel the public condemnation will be muted, after all they chose to be “over there” and are making a better wage than working at McDonalds or Walmart.”
Aptly put Henry. I’d like to make a further inference. The outsourcing of well paying jobs creates a perfect feed back loop for corporate exploitation. Risk you butt for decent benefits, because to trust a company that will not assure job security is a bridge too far for HS grads or even now graduates of college. And college is tantamount to indentured sevitude considering the debt load. The consumer-based economic model is now all about maximizing public debt and accumulating the interest and minimum payments. How long will this idiocy be sustainable? Ask you Citibank represenative in Congress.
Report thisBy RayLan, January 2, 2011 at 5:47 am Link to this comment
Reasons for the wars -
Report thisIf we don’t fight them there, they’ll come here
(They’re recruited here - Americans -duh it just takes a pilot or two)
We need to fight the war on Terror
(Where would that be?
We need to be in a state of permanent global war )
It’s our job to bring Democracy to the world
(Right - force countries to determine themselves by attacking their country - that’s alwasy worked.)
By independent politics, January 2, 2011 at 3:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
One of the many reasons Ralph Nader had my vote for the past four presidential
Report thiselections. Ralph Nader for President 2012
By independent politics, January 2, 2011 at 3:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
ONE OF THE MANY REASONS RALPH NADER HAD MY VOTE FOR THE PAST FOUR
Report thisPRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. RALPH NADER FOR PRESIDENT 2012
By independent politics, January 2, 2011 at 3:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
ONE OF THE MANY REASONS RALPH NADER HAD MY VOTE FOR THE PAST FOUR
Report thisPRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. RALPH NADER FOR PRESIDENT 2012 ! ! ! !
By TAO Walker, January 2, 2011 at 2:14 am Link to this comment
Meantime, just ignore the death-worshipers behind the gangbangers behind the curtain. This isn’t about make-believe “America,” Sisters and Brothers. That “dream” is over.
This is the real thing….the actual EMERGENCY.
HokaHey!
Report thisBy SteveL, January 1, 2011 at 11:48 pm Link to this comment
All the justifications for going to war in Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Pakistan were highly dubious. Poking stick in a hornets nest will not add to our security one bit, just to opposite. As far as the oil, minerals and pipelines go, we could have bought these from the people of these countries for a lot less than what it cost in lives and money to try and get these at gunpoint. At the end of the day the corporate bastards that profit from all the wars would rater have the soldiers killed and the taxpayers pay for all this so they could rack up the profits. Lot like the way things are done right here at home.
Report thisBy REDHORSE, January 1, 2011 at 9:54 pm Link to this comment
Sgt. Kovics’ is a simple request for aid in confronting the lie machine that manufactured the present State of War. Either do or don’t.
The abject moral failure and profligate corruption of American Political and Judiciary leadership returns all responsibility and power directly to the People. All decisions political and moral now rest with the citizen. There are no non-combatants. Innocence is dead. The consequences of moral abdication are real.
Organize or perish.
Report thisBy ocjim, January 1, 2011 at 7:00 pm Link to this comment
http://www.liberalvoices.com/
We need a people-centered coup to get us out of the war mode.
Report thisBy ocjim, January 1, 2011 at 6:58 pm Link to this comment
Both wars will ultimately cost between $3 trillion and $5 trillion. The stupidity of throwing away that kind of money when Americans are in need of jobs, education, infrastructure and health care is colossal.
Spending more for a military than the rest of the world combined only depletes our resources of men, women, materials, and technology, while leaving our competitors free to kick our economic asses from here to the bottoms of global ditches where we are supposedly fighting terrorism.
Our pampered global corporations will do fine because the asses that will be kicked belong to workers and the American middle class. Corporations will just exploit.
Our most challenged and incurious President, and now one of our brightest Presidents, is making the same mistake, blowing money on fruitless efforts of military fighting and occupation, efforts that are doomed for failure.
Our terrorist enemies, happy with their accomplishments, deride us and scoff at our motions of “fighting terrorism” while domestic needs are starved of funding.
Unarmed and helpless, leaders watch our infrastructure crumble, our schools turn out non-competitive workers, the unemployed despair, scarred veterans return to bleak futures, and brave fighting men and women lose life and limb in efforts made futile by mindless forays into sovereign countries with alien cultures.
Report thisBy Leefeller, January 1, 2011 at 6:38 pm Link to this comment
Thanks Gerard, good points yes; there has been much ado about advocates of peace not supporting the troops and of course labeling promoters of peace as being unpatriotic. When in effect the destruction of the Constitution seems a non issue.
Report thisBy gerard, January 1, 2011 at 6:21 pm Link to this comment
Leefeller: Possible answers to consider:
Report this1, Having seen the grim realities, maybe they are in some ways specially qualified?
2. People who think peace groups are anti-patriotic kooks might give more credence to veterans who obviously have “proven” that they are patriotic. (This would tend to make some people more confident that the veterans’ group is not “socialist” etc. etc.
3. Maybe they know there are many veterans, in active service and otherwise, who would trust them more and join as brothers and sisters whereas civilians (of a broader stripe of experiences) might be considered “less reliable”?
Other?
By john from ojai, January 1, 2011 at 6:20 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Bless Ron Kovic. I’ve had two friends who had boys that were considering the military. I asked them to show their sons the movie “Born on the Fourth of July”. Neither boy enlisted after seeing that movie.
Report thisBy Leefeller, January 1, 2011 at 5:26 pm Link to this comment
Eric Johansson or anyone else;
Power takeovers of causes is nothing new, I suspect even peace movements are not unsustainable. What I do not understand is why “Veterans for Peace” why not people or everyone for peace? I understand the credence of the Veteran being one myself, but why the clear cut distinctness?
Report thisBy gerard, January 1, 2011 at 4:31 pm Link to this comment
Lots to tie together here:
Report this1, Leefeller points out “nothing is new.” This ignores the WikiLeaks releases and their significance, pointing out new possibilities of the worldwide free Internet toward opening up information deliberately hidden from people who need it in order to govern themselves.
2. skimohawk bemoans “no free press today”, apparently not realizing that WikiLeaks points to an answer for that problem.
3.ArtfulDodger suggests: “..if we can remove false flag operations”. Relevant and timely information kept secret from the public could be revealed by proper use of technology for the benefit of citizens and false flag operations would be much more difficult to pull off if people knew ahead of time through proper use of information technologies like WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks, WikiLeaks! We need to absorb the meaning of this revolutionary event and realize its potential. We ignore it at great risk to the future of democracy.
Eric Johansson brings up an old, unsolved problem of the peace movement in general related to ideological disputes between left and more left peace groups. Until they can unite around strict nonviolent action I don’t see how they can succeed under present circumstances. The left versus more left doesn’t matter as much as the gap between violence and nonviolence both in theory and in practice. Groups that insist on violence as a way to stop nonviolence have an uphill struggle because many more people these days see that you can’t get peace by making war. The truth has been a long time buried, but especially since Afghanistan it’s now more apparent than ever.
Thanks, Ron Kovic.
By democratz.org, January 1, 2011 at 4:19 pm Link to this comment
I hope you will sign this petition and get your friends to sign it.
Fight back against conservatives in congress. Boycott some companies that donate to conservatives in congress.
Sign this petition at http://www.democratz.org demanding congress and the President enact a progressive agenda. Pass this link around to every one of your friends. Post it on bulletin boards, blogs and facebook groups around this country and send it on twitter. The Peaceful revolution has begun.
We have a demand to end the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in the petition.
Report thisBy el poeta, January 1, 2011 at 4:10 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
As I have said many times before it will not be until We demand this war to be stopped and embrace the ideas of Maitreya that changes will happen;
Report this“When, among nations, the Rule of Law is ignored, the whole world suffers. Thus, today, the tension which has accompanied this futile demonstration of military strength affects millions, innocent of all terrorist action or mayhem. The world is struggling now with epidemics of all kinds as the human immune system breaks down under the stress. Did the warmongers but realize the karmic effects of their ill-considered actions, they might well make amends and take sightings for another course. Maitreya, meanwhile, watches carefully this inharmonious situation, ready to intervene if necessary, ready to emerge when possible. Remember that Maitreya is in no doubt about “the ultimate triumph of those who stand behind Him, who value peace and justice, freedom and love.”
From Share International Magazine
By Eric Johansson, January 1, 2011 at 3:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Ron Kovic is a member of Veterans for Peace and he is entitled to his opinion and I agree with most of it…...my only issue with this article is why do these veterans and active-duty military personnel have to join March Forward when they could just as easily join Veterans for Peace or Iraq Veterans Against the War? I actually thought it a rather interesting idea until I learned they were an affiliate of the ANSWER coalition, which is known for their hard-left, virtual communist, politics. Communism and Fascism are both equally shitty, equally totalitarian and equally warmongering in my book. Do they have any room for conservative veterans against the war? Or like everything with ANSWER are they more devoted to their brand of pinko partisan politics than to ending the war?? Besides ANSWER seems to blame Israel for everything since as I can only guess their organization is packed with anti-Semitic types…...(and while the State of Israel does deserve some blame, it does not deserve all the blame———-the U.S. shares blame too and anyone doing violence also is to blame which means the Palestine Al-Aqsa Marty’s Brigades are also to blame as are other violent Palestinian elements including rock-throwing children who are to blame and who partially responsible.) Anyone resorting to violence has blood on their hands and is part of the problem and should be blamed and held to account. Non-violence resistance, however, is the best means to achieving the goal of peace and liberty and freedom.
Sincerely,
Eric E. Johansson
Report thisVeterans for Peace
San Francisco
By Leefeller, January 1, 2011 at 2:46 pm Link to this comment
Always seems to be one asshole in the crowd, bringing out there holy Zionist card! What is this, some kind of code to change the thread for one reason or the other? Ignorance seems like a horn of plenty, stupidity has no bounds and bigotry manipulations even more so!
One can hope to ignore them like Sarah Palin, only to find them like the conspiring theorists who love to reflect on the grassy knoll, obviously small minds are not exclusive to the Republicans.
Ass holes of ass holes permeate the world and sadly nothing is new.
Report thisBy Rudolfo, January 1, 2011 at 1:53 pm Link to this comment
The anti-war movement of the 60s was led by Zionists. The difference between now and then is that now the Zionists support the war.
Report thisBy anonhorde, January 1, 2011 at 1:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I approve of this 101%. It is time my kindred, salvation is in our hands.
Report thisBy FRTothus, January 1, 2011 at 1:34 pm Link to this comment
Well said, PatrickHenry, January 1 at 4:58 pm.
Report thisBy Leefeller, January 1, 2011 at 12:40 pm Link to this comment
The Democrats are as enabling of war as the Republicans, so focusing on one seems a weak link in reason and a grave error in opinion.
Bush the Republican Vietnam evader promoted the wars and the Democrats approved them, both parties seem war hawks to me.
Being frustrated by the opportunists in Washington is not a new feeling for me, but why do you sound surprised and mad or upset with TD posters Michael Cavlan RN?
Report thisBy Michael Cavlan RN, January 1, 2011 at 12:28 pm Link to this comment
Inherit The Wind
You talk of Obama not remembering the war protest movements of the 60’s
and 70’s.
The reality is quite different. The war protest movement generation that gave
us Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Woodstock etc etc etc are the very ones who
presented us with John Kerry, Bill Clinton and their latest war criminal Barack
Obama.
I see cars with the bumper sticker of things like End-less Wars and Peace signs.
Right next to their Obama sticker. What the hell is wrong with these people?
The reason that there are no significant war protests are quite simple. It has
nothing to do with the draft (although it is a small factor)
It is because there is a DEMOCRAT in the White House.
Until folks wake up to that reality, that the Democratic Party are the frigging
ENEMY of Peace, Justice and progressive politics, it is my studied opinion that
nothing will change..
In the 60’s the chants were Hey Hey LBJ (who was at least supportive of the
poor) How Many Kids Did You Kill Today.
Now it is
Yes We Can or Give Obama A Chance.
Mind you, I am pretty much done with the TruthDig debating society as well..
I visit here less and less.
Report thisBy RayLan, January 1, 2011 at 12:13 pm Link to this comment
But but aren’t the soldiers protecting us from…help me out here- this is where it gets fuzzy - oh well they’re protecting us - Raise that flag - launch those drones - we are on a God-ordained mission of freedom and liberation!
Report thisBy It doesn't matter I don't have rights I'm just a s, January 1, 2011 at 12:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
How do they get most of their funding? Taxes!
Don’t pay your taxes and you’ll be thrown in prison,
but who runs the prisons? The people.
Try to protest and we will send the army after you,
who runs our military? The people do
Just imagine if we all came together as one, set down
reasonable ground rules that won’t put one party or
group of people with all the power. Imagine if the
majority of the middle and lower class didn’t pay
taxes. The prison system is already over crowded as
it is, do you think they will throw all the working
Americans in prison? If the majority of the Marines,
Army, Navy and airforce came together with us how
could they try and control us? Too bad they’re
already ahead of us if you haven’t noticed the DEA
has expanded world wide, jobs are being outsourced to
third world countries, it all keeps happening in
front of our faces but all we do is complain, very
few people actually take action and attempt to make a
change. I don’t care if you’re black, white, orange, Japanese, gay ,a Muslim, Catholic, Mormon, Christian,
or atheist you have the right to do what you want in
the privacy of your home. If drugs is your fancy then
so be it, breaking down your door and sending you to
prison will just dig a deeper hole. Do you now feel
safer that another drug addict is off the street but
it’s ok to drop bombs on innocent people in Iraq.
Thank god those soldiers are defending our country,
don’t believe me? watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cJ9ca0ed64
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, January 1, 2011 at 11:58 am Link to this comment
As long as we have the all volunteer army of mercenaries I feel the public condemnation will be muted, after all they chose to be “over there” and are making a better wage than working at McDonalds or Walmart.
If we still had the draft and our children were being taken from us unwillingly, parents would have a more vested interest in who America chooses to wage war on.
With the draft these wars would have been over a long time ago.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, January 1, 2011 at 11:55 am Link to this comment
Ron Kovic has been a brilliant and articulate advocate for sane paths for 40 years now. I remember him on talk shows in the ‘70’s, still a young man.
But the GOP chicken hawks and the Dim chicken gizzards don’t see the vast pain of the Ron Kovics of the world. Hell, Bush & co CUT funding for the VA and especially the Afghanistan/Iraq wars’ wounded service men and women. Since Lincoln’s time we, as a nation, have advocated as one of our HIGHEST values to take care of the wounded vet and his/her family.
Even that was violated by the coward/bully George W. Bush.
As for Barack Obama? He falls in between the Viet Nam and Afghan war generations…and doesn’t remember the war protest movement of the 60’s and early 70’s.
But Ron Kovic is a potent reminder of it all. In so many ways our nation owes a giant debt to this hero.
Report thisBy Leefeller, January 1, 2011 at 10:33 am Link to this comment
Wars of commerce, opportunity and manipulation what reason is there for theses wars? Vietnam Vets served 13 months back then, I cannot comprehend the multi tours the troops now serve and even how Viet Nam evader Bush sent in the National Guard without nary a complaint.
Disgusting opportunism seems to me and such a waste of lives and money to be ignored by a seemingly propagandized media which focuses on contrived inaneness.
So, what war again?
Report thisBy glider, January 1, 2011 at 8:57 am Link to this comment
It is really encouraging to see Vietnam Vets getting involved in trying to stop this madness. I think they as a group can lend a special credibility to the anti-war effort. All we need to do is get to a certain level of critical mass to catalyze a meaningful change from within such as occurred ultimately to end the outrage of Vietnam.
Report thisBy still trying, January 1, 2011 at 8:48 am Link to this comment
Our government is so steeped in lies and evil that it no longer represents what is true and good about America. The greedy rich and powerful who are without conscience have stolen our country. We must do everything we can to get it back.
Report thisBy kristi, January 1, 2011 at 5:54 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
thanks, ron. invaluable contribution to the peace movement. love & happy new
Report thisyear.
By Don Quixote, January 1, 2011 at 4:04 am Link to this comment
Great article and inspirational. i will make that commitment to oppose these wars
Report thissome way with others/ It doesn’t take much to ignite a prairie fire.
By Kwagmyre, January 1, 2011 at 2:05 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Sad to say, but Obama has proven he really wasn’t up to the “Change” and “Yes we can” mottos that he trumpeted so much prior to being elected two years ago. It was Kucinich that REALLY would’ve accomplished what so many us wanted….the prompt and complete withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan(the latter now called “Vietnamestan” by Daniel Ellsberg).
Report thisBy skimohawk, January 1, 2011 at 1:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Mr. Kovic:
December 16 was three weeks ago, and whatever happened at the front gates of the White House that day is a now-forgotten blip on a big radar screen.
I have a great respect and admiration for you and all others who have marched off to war.
I was on the side that said “Hell No!”, and have for the last four decades wondered how things might have otherwise been ( had I gone off to join you and your comrades in some Asian jungle. )
We live in a different era today. Not that war is any different ( other than technological advances that have enabled us to kill more efficiently ), but rather that the general public has been dumbed-down by defense-contractor-owned mainstream media sources.
Moreover, the “you’re either for us or against us” mantra ( wrapped up in the scoundrel’s flag ) has caused the majority to believe anyone not fully in support of this farcical “war on terror” is something less than patriotic. ( Exactly the same as Vietnam, until the reality of war finally started appearing on nightly news broadcasts. )
Unfortunately we have no independent free press today: only lackeys working for the same companies who manufacture or profit from the sale of weaponry.
Only by garnering the support of a broader demographic, specifically those between 15 and 30 years of age, will there be an adequate force to confront the current power structure. Presently I do not see that happening in this country, but was recently greatly encouraged after watching video footage of angry mobs of kids in London rioting this last November. ( For the record: I was impressed by their zeal, but believe smashing windows out of office buildings will have little, if any, effect. )
The children ( and younger people ) of today need to be taught the truth: and that truth is easily found by simply following the money.
What’s in Afghanistan that’s in the interests of our own “national security”? After a quick search, I come up with five possibilities:
(1.) oil, (2.) natural gas, (3.) copper, (4.) iron ore, (5.) lithium.
It’s that last one that really tossed me, until I started reading about current uses of lithium.
Sure, maybe more nutty “conspiracy” stuff. Maybe not.
Somewhere out there is the real answer as to why we’re occupying a country that’s been unsuccessfully invaded and occupied by countless others over millenia. That answer most certainly has absolutely nothing to do with “national security”.
It’s the kids on the high school and college campuses who need to hear the message. How do we get them to stop text-messaging long enough to pay attention?
Sincerely,
Rejected by the U.S. Army ( subversive character )
Report thisBy Artful Dodger, January 1, 2011 at 12:07 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What does Mr. Kovic have to say on 9-11 truth? We are in these wars based upon a false flag operation.The Vietnam War was based upon the flase flag of the Tonkin Gulf incident. If we can remove false flag operations as credible causes for war, then we have taken a potent weapons away from the arms merchants.
Report thisBy rav, December 31, 2010 at 11:27 pm Link to this comment
This is a powerful article and should be taken to heart by every american and around the world, my hat’s off to you Ron and to all who have paid a dear price for false or unknown reasons!
Report thisBy LostHills, December 31, 2010 at 11:16 pm Link to this comment
Time to stop this war, friends, and we have to do it ourselves.
Report this