LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 22, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Lock Up Washington

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

How America Became a Third World Country: 2013-2023

California Man Sues Officers He Says Nearly Beat Him to Death

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * The Path of Hubris and War
 * NEW! * Glaciers Are Melting Slowly but Surely
 * NEW! * How America Became a Third World Country: 2013-2023

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Our Delusions of Grandeur Will Save the World

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Oct 17, 2011
Flickr/_PaulS_ (CC-BY-SA)

An Occupy Wall Street protester takes to the Brooklyn Bridge on Oct. 1.

By Bhaskar Sunkara

(Page 2)

It’s worth looking back at past youth movements. The radical student upsurge of the 1960s took place in a novel socioeconomic context. Higher education was expanded due to the postwar demand for technicians and researchers. Mass institutions of learning grew along with the economy. This growth led to conflict. Crowding, bureaucratization and paternalism aggrieved youths. Though they weren’t exactly proletarianized, capitalist development had created a potential enemy in students closely concentrated enough to facilitate their self-organization as political actors. They had plenty of spare time too.

The university has morphed since then. Student enrollment keeps increasing, but college life has become less communal. Forget common rooms; we have locks and laptops. New dorms are designed like individual apartments. The Princeton Review even factors in how spacious and private living accommodations are in its rankings. Forget rallies and marches; the best a student activist can expect from her peers is an e-signature on an online petition. Atomized, apolitical student life for an atomized, apolitical era. It’s a fitting corollary to the relationship students are made to feel toward their school’s administrations—as individual consumers of a product. Our collective identity as students has been stripped.

The new actions overcome this loneliness. Much has been made of the media’s role in fueling the Wall Street occupations. But for all the postmodern vestiges still stuck to many of the participants’ politics, there’s something remarkably old school about the approach. Create communal space, ask others to come join you, discuss social and political grievances together, and march around to disrupt the offending system’s usual operation. The Occupied Wall Street Journal is printed, passed around and discussed at the site. Print: the new avant-garde.

When the occupation started, doctrinaire leftists were quick to point out, among other things, the relative class privilege of the initial campers. This isn’t surprising. Class entitlement is the kind of conceit the Bolsheviks iced little Anastasia over, but this particular manifestation of it is a wellspring for the left. It’s not so much a desire to rise to a social position from where one can exploit others, but a feeling that an implicit social contract has been broken and redress is in order. The left-wing curmudgeons are overstating their case. The average student can expect 25 grand in debt and his or her fair share of menial jobs and unpaid internships during college. The “real world” after school offers much of the same. Of course, it does take a degree of privilege to “drop out” and decide to drum-circle it up in Liberty Plaza. Not having kids to feed and being young and in good health helps. Many also have mom and dad to fall back on if their financial situation gets too dire.

Advertisement

Yet it’s easy to see that apathy among a subset of middle-class youth is turning to politicization, and the natural form of this politicization is protest against the neoliberal state’s slashing of the social benefits that created the modern middle class in the first place. The movement was sparked by a tiny demographic, but it has since spread and will continue to spread. The increasing involvement of unions and overtures to disadvantaged communities will change the class and racial composition of our nascent anti-austerity movement.

Yes, with few exceptions, “generational” analysis is bullshit pioneered by hacks and publicists. Cultural experience is never so broadly shared. But neoliberalism has seen the life prospects for a large portion of the population, maybe not quite 99 percent but close, decline. Maybe it took some obnoxious petit bourgeois individualists to spark the fight back.

“Idealism,” William F. Buckley wrote, “is fine, but as it approaches reality, the costs become prohibitive.” But what happens when present reality can’t match our ideals? How about an attempt to create a new reality?


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By fuzzydbear, October 20, 2011 at 7:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Alot of people are acting, the thing is will it get
the corporate criminal/bankster robber employee
occupiers of OUR offices and buildings OUT? I
ask…What are we paying ALL of these reps, agencies,
judges, police, military etc. when they clearly DO
NOT represent the lifetime TAX PAYING AMERICAN
citizens? It is disgusting! Example: NYPD collects
pay checks, healthcare and pensions ( what might be
left)  from AMERICAN tax paying families, we pay for
all of their riot gear. Chase donated a big chunk of
change to some part of the NYPD agency, so now they
work for Chase! Example Two: We pay for police agencies to protect us and our rights, civil
liberties etc., yet they run around enforcing revenue
grubbing laws, draconian laws they know are wrong to
get inmates, fines so prisons can make profit off of
TAX PAYERS for each inmate and profit off of SLAVE
labor and unfair fines!
FDA, EPA,DEA,CIA,USDA,POLICE,MILITARY etc., etc. ALL
are serving the better interest for the corporate
criminals/bankster robbers. Oil corporations get TAX
subsidies, TAX breaks,  and we pay OUR military to
police ( develop, liberate, fight for OUR freedom for
oil, gold, any other resource they feel like, and
opium)  their agendas.
The daily running of OUR government is in the
interest of corporations and bankster robbers!Where
is OUR military that gets the lion’s share of our
budget, when these Anti-democracy occupiers Hi-Jacked
OUR offices and buildings?  They also are using OUR
tax dollars for their profit, earth destroying,
enslavement and world domination agendas. They would
like it if we just shut our mouth GAVE them EVERY
single penny, or work for free, for nothing, they
want it ALL and their employees are in OUR offices
manipulating, changing, implementing to ensure their
bosses get all the help they need!
Democracy and Capitalism cannot work together unless
BOTH are kept in check! It is OUR responsibility and
our duty ( inspite of what the police or patriot acts
and homeland security tell you) to ENSURE ” The
American People’s government is run BY the people, of
the people, for the people” NOT soul-less entities
only for profit and of course SLAVES, whether grunt
labor, or economic
Sigh… What a mess! A lot of people also fought and
died for our freedoms that are very carefully
disappearing one by one. BOTH parties are employees
of corporate/bankster interests period! Too bad
TV/MEDIA sold out too! They ruined TV, they ruin
everything!

Report this

By wendykase, October 20, 2011 at 6:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

While this man is skilled at writing, the substance of what he says is about as confused as anything I’ve seen. And, I take particular issue with his “take” on the movements of the 1960’s. I was there, and he’s got it all wrong. My God, why would you publish something like this on your website? Unless you want to increase the high levels of anger and anxiety we already live in.

Report this
Oceanna's avatar

By Oceanna, October 19, 2011 at 11:52 am Link to this comment

It’s a good piece.  Though I found my initial knee-jerking to the title—which I
think was meant to be ironic and perhaps even baiting—somewhat difficult to get
past. 

I really surprised myself by agreeing with the William F. Buckley quote and
conclusion.  Though I’m wondering if Bhaskar isn’t confusing Buckminster Fuller
with the other namesake.

Report this

By Nick, October 18, 2011 at 11:33 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Thanks for the feedback, Gerard, and I basically agree with your points. I also think it’s tough, and maybe pointless, to try to rank the various factors—though the issues 5 & 6 you raised were along the lines of what I was thinking when I commented. But maybe that reflects the fact that I’m a student, and have way more (putting it mildly) free time and far fewer (again, a serious understatement) responsibilities than most people. But anyway it seems that one of the more serious tasks at this point is to articulate some sort of vision of a future society, in a way that resists mystification (e.g., history progressing in stages, perpetuating the “noble lie” of a general strike, etc.), and yet is still able to combat the TINA virus. Not that this is a novel concept, of course: flip through the pages of Alexander Berkman’s “The Blast!” (1916-1917) and you’ll find plenty of discussion of the importance of “vision,” and these days ZNet’s Michael Albert stresses it—and has developed, with Robin Hahnel, and alternative economic system called “Parecon.” Obviously this comment doesn’t address the other issues you appropriately raised, and it certainly isn’t intended to imply that we need to focus solely on “vision.” But at the same time it seems that, if a lot of time and energy is devoted simply to explaining how bad things are, when most people are already perfectly aware of this situation, then a shift of focus may be required.

Report this

By gerard, October 18, 2011 at 10:47 am Link to this comment

Nick:  You ask: “What’s preventing these people from acting?” Suggestions, order having no significance:
  1. Fear of getting “surveilled,” police etc.
  2. Can’t afford to take time off or spend money to travel.
  3. Family, job responsibilities.
  4. Illness, physical disability, age.
  5. Doubt that anyone can do much to help, lack of self confidence. Defeatism.
  6. Doubt that protests are effective, due to media misrepresentation of previous demostrations etc.
  7. Habitual lack of political engagement. Total absorbtion in some other endeavor.

Report this

By DarthMiffy, October 18, 2011 at 7:15 am Link to this comment

EmileZ…I really wish you would change your avatar. It’s as repulsive as you
seem to think the dreadlocked white kid is. And that, is just my opinion.

Report this

By diman, October 18, 2011 at 5:35 am Link to this comment

“America didn’t happen by accident. A lot of people worked really hard. They’ve got to do their part too.”

Oh really Hillary? People? What people? A lot of slaves worked hard, that is a fact, but who else?

Report this

By diman, October 18, 2011 at 5:21 am Link to this comment

Holy shit, I didn’t know I was a “Millenial”.

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, October 18, 2011 at 3:25 am Link to this comment

@ whiteboy

Why did you have to make that disturbing “orgasm”  face?

Are you trying to give poor EmileZ nightmares or what???

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, October 18, 2011 at 3:06 am Link to this comment

Hey whiteboy, yeah you with the haircut… this is what might be imagined coming out of you grotesquely formed lips….

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RArKtNh9eag

Enjoy.

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, October 18, 2011 at 2:20 am Link to this comment

I hate that damn kid with whiteboy dreadlocks. I hate his mouth. I intensely dislike the pose.

No offense young man. I suppose you should feel honored…

I’m just kidding.

Or am I…....        Aaaahhhhh!!!!!

Report this
Shenonymous's avatar

By Shenonymous, October 18, 2011 at 1:21 am Link to this comment

Acute reaction to this brief double-edged essay may lead one
down a path to lathering perplexity.  Clearly an unsettling set
of sentiments, it seems behooved and essential that a careful
rereading by those who keep their wits about them see what
is said, and what is not said.

Report this

By Malik, October 17, 2011 at 11:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The title is ironic… Come on people.

Great piece though, many provocative points.

Report this

By Nick, October 17, 2011 at 9:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Nice swipe at generational analysis here. Where’s the Thomas Szasz, though? On a more serious note, I’d be curious to read more of what you have to say on what it means to be atomized/apolitical today versus, say, fifty years ago, if you have any thoughts on that. Do you think activists face the same challenges today in terms of mobilizing people as they did in previous generations? Is this more worthless generational analysis? Or is there something worth noticing in the fact that, say, while in 1964 we could help take down Brazil’s elected President Joao Goulart, and nobody would blink, in June 2009 when Honduras’ Zelaya was flown out of the country there was immediately an outcry, followed by serious efforts to figure out how exactly the US influenced the coup? Does this greater awareness of what the US is up to in the world seem to generalize across the population? Or does it at least seem like the terrible effects of US policies would come as less of a surprise to people today than they would have to people 50 years ago, who I imagine would have been appalled to know the US bombed most of Japan’s cities well before Hiroshima and Nagasaki were ruined? Do the abysmal approval ratings of Congress—ranging from 10% all the way up to 15%—tell us anything? What about the fact that 2/3 of Americans believe government policies overwhelmingly benefit the rich? In a nutshell what I’m asking is: What sort of apathy is it when people are already opposed to US policies (majority of Americans oppose US presence in Afghanistan, for example)? What sort of apathy is it when people have a general sense of whose interests the govt. serves? What’s preventing these people from acting?

Report this

By rumblingspire, October 17, 2011 at 8:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

just as every child born has equal access to heaven, every child born has equal access to the gifts here on earth, we have equal access to all natural resources and essential services.
it is foolish for a community to allow private ownership of natural resources or essential services.

the mind without a heart is a calculator.  god need not apply.

Report this

By rumblingspire, October 17, 2011 at 7:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

THE FRENCH REVOLUTION CALENDAR

“The calendar consisted of 12 months of 30 days each, with 5 extra days (6 in a leap year) at the end to match the solar year. Instead of seven-days weeks, the months were divided on three ten-days weeks called décades. This decimal system established thus a much more regular and organized calendar.

The calendar was adopted of 24 October 1793, but the start of it was fixed on 22 september 1792, that was both the day the French Republic was proclaimed and that year’s autumn equinox in Paris. Years were counted from 1792 and written in Roman numerals.:”

http://personal.telefonica.terra.es/web/jlmartinmas/repcalendar/calendar.html

reality

Report this

By gerard, October 17, 2011 at 7:41 pm Link to this comment

Occupy Wall Street, and its sisters and brothers, are creating a new reality by the very way they operate every day—by what they do and how they do it, and by what they don’t do as well. Crowding it all into one concept, it’s participatory democracy free of violence even when provoked, and depending upon cooperation and horizontal decision-making as much as possible. Such a politics also requires self-discipline and restraint—virtues not frequently prefigured in the annals of the the last 100 years.  So they are way ahead in awareness of process—that is, “how” to move forward. Since means so often determines ends, this is very hopeful.
  The specifics of “what” will certainly require as much innovation and care, and seem to be requiring more time. Occupiers can’t be blamed for this lag, since quite apparently nobody else—for all the power, clout, expeience and money in other sectors seems to have anything creative to offer. 
  Here’s hoping some innovators are somewhere in the wings, preparing to enter with vision, plans and methods of facilitation.
  PS—The headlined “delusions of grandeur” threw me off the first time I read this, before I’d done any research to gain context. I still find that cliche used here to be repulsive and misleading.

Report this
prisnersdilema's avatar

By prisnersdilema, October 17, 2011 at 6:47 pm Link to this comment

A potpourri of pointlessness…and cynicism…. it won’t make the pain go away, but only
push it further down, forcing it to come out sideways..


..some times rage just needs a little focus…

Report this
OzarkMichael's avatar

By OzarkMichael, October 17, 2011 at 5:51 pm Link to this comment

One must have no heart to criticize this article since some kid put his heart and life into it.

I agree with ardee, and consider such offerings very carefully before launching into critical mode.

Report this

By Tom, October 17, 2011 at 4:39 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The commentary quite well expresses the betrayal of the middle class by the wealthy.  In their greedy quest to increase their already unspendable wealth, they have taken away the American Dream.  The kids today (excuse me, I am over 60 and lived through the Sixties; we have seen this before, maybe not so bad) are right to feel betrayed.  They have been betrayed by the tax-cutters, by the free-traders and by the super-wealthy generally (other than a few like Warren Buffet).  The rules are not fair, what rules there are, are not evenly and fairly applied.  The government has been bought by the big corporations. The only way out of this is by a ground swell of the people, the 99% who have lost during the time that the 1%, and especially the 0.1%, have so richly profited from our loss.

Report this

By Tibbie, October 17, 2011 at 3:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This article, quite brilliantly, flips the argument on
the liberal narrative that “status anxiety” drives
people right. With this generation it seems to be doing
the opposite.

Report this

By gerard, October 17, 2011 at 3:31 pm Link to this comment

What is this article actually saying:  “Delusions of grandeur will create a new realitiy?”  I don’t get it. Sounds absurd, especially when you consider the struggles throughout the “neo-liberalized-to-death” world.

Report this

By ardee, October 17, 2011 at 3:27 pm Link to this comment

Quite a mixed review I think. I find certain truths within this article, some of which are a bit uncomfortable, frankly.

But I remain optimistic that this new fervor to engage politically among our youths will lead to a new generation of political leftist leaders and bring a certain amount of much needed education to even the older generations.

Report this
EmileZ's avatar

By EmileZ, October 17, 2011 at 1:33 pm Link to this comment

Stevie Wonder - He’s Misstra Know-It-All

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL5wei4phz0

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.